Comparing opposite characters in literature can highlight distinct personality differences. It is the best way to understand characters from clearly different standpoints. In Crime and Punishment, written by Fyodor Dostoevsky, the main character and his closest friend are actually opposite of each other. Raskolnikov, the protagonist, is a stubborn and confused man who is weighted down by guilt. He committed a murder that he believed was necessary due to his lack of wealth and unstable life. This creates turmoil in his conscience and drives him close to insanity. The contrasting character to Raskolnikov is Razumihin. Razumihin is one of Raskolnikov’s few friends and is described as being caring and responsible. Both are important characters …show more content…
Svidrigaïlov was a character who was sure of himself unlike the unstable Raskolnikov. He was wealthy and cared for others financially. Unlike Raskolnikov, Svidrigaïlov was willing to die in order to be put out of his misery. Raskolnikov wanted to live out his guilt and seek out a peaceful end. Even after a year in prison and still nine more years left there, Raskolnikov achieved much more in solitary confinement than living freely. He eventually understood that he could love and came to appreciate living in freedom. Although he felt a heavy weight of guilt for a long period of time, he was finally at peace with himself after confessing. Svidrigaïlov could not accept living without someone who loved him, which was completely opposite of Raskolnikov's view towards love. Svidrigaïlov had gotten so upset with himself for not getting the woman of his dreams, that he committed suicide due to his extreme frustration. The ending of the two characters was opposite of what the reader had been picturing in their mind. A confident and wealthy man ends with suicide, whereas the poor and crazed man ends up achieving the happy ending. The irony brings out the foil
He immediately convinced himself that it was a sign that he must commit the murder the next night. The use of coincidence and environment as self-justification shows that he feels guilty and needs validation for his crimes. He cannot turn to God like Sonia because he is a selfish man and repenting means that he must admit to himself that he had done wrong. Instead of feeling disappointment in himself he will blame his actions on the world around him. Raskolnikov askes Sonia to read him a passage out of the Bible and she reads him the story of Lazarus.
Both men are seen acting in very similar manners. In the split nature of Raskolnikov’s mind and conscious Svidrigaylov represents the side of altered reason. As mentioned above reason is governed by logical determinants. However, due to Raskolnikov embodying a sense of superiority over others the logical aspect in his reasoning becomes flawed, thus resulting in him turning towards consumption, similar to Svidrigailov. As commonly noted in the novel Svidrigailov is seen having one main function, to satisfy carnal pleasures in his life- QUOTE!. Representing an ‘extraordinary man” he believes that since the world is at its foundation an evil and vile place; man must therefore become in tune with the universe and become evil himself, allowing him to become free of having to controls one own will and power. This is a commonly debated thought found in the mind of Raskolnikov who is constantly attempting to punish himself but on the other hand is also seen justifying his crime and falling into this extraordinary or nihilistic point of view. Another similarity between the two is the action of charity. Svidrigailov commits his own acts of charity simply because of his impulsive behavior to act upon things that grant him pleasure. This can similarly be said about Raskolnikov who seems to commit his own acts of charity in a seemingly impulsive fashion as well lending to the nihilistic persona. The nihilistic thought however changes within both men at the end of the book. In Svidrigaylov’s case once realizing that he cannot fully isolate himself from the rest of humanity. This is brought on upon the denial of Dunya in his attempted marriage proposal. Forced to realize that his old method of living is shattered he must take the only course left for
Between all the other characters in Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov are the most similar in that Svidrigailov is depicted as Raskolnikov’s baser self and a depraved character. While Raskolnikov is seen to be a more repentant character who is afflicted with guilt after murdering the pawnbroker for his own selfish desires despite telling himself it is for the greater good, Svidrigailov is rumored to have committed several murders and feels nothing for his victims, one of them being his own wife. Throughout the story, Rask is shown as wanting to be like Svidrigailov just as Svidrigailov longs to be like Rask because each one has qualities that the other wants in their life.
Raskolnikov, the main character of the novel Crime and Punishment by Feodor Dostoevsky, actually possesses two completely contradicting personalities. One part of him is intellectual: cold, unfeeling, inhumane, and exhibiting tremendous self-will. It is this side of him that enables him to commit the most terrible crime imaginable - taking another human life. The other part of his personality is warm and compassionate. This side of him does charitable acts and fights against the evil in his society.
When Raskolnikov was a student he enjoyed the debate and human contact, but also strived for acceptance. He had a dual nature to himself, which could be characterized by his cold intelligence, which separated him from society, and his compassionate side. After Raskolnikov murdered Alyona and Lizaveta Ivanovna
Throughout the story we are shown that he is not above the emotions and guilt that are the basic human reactions to an action as extreme as murder. His downfall comes because of this very fact, as he mentally and physically deteriorates under the stress of his culpability. His arrogance is proven to be the unfounded and foolhardy ideas of one who is truly a deeply insecure and unstable person (though Raskolnikov never truly realizes this).
In the novel “Crime and Punishment”, the author, Fyodor Dostoevsky gives the reader a glimpse into the mind of a tormented criminal, by his guilt of a murder. Dostoevsky’s main focal point of the novel doesn’t lie within the crime nor the punishment but within the self-conflicting battle of a man and his guilty conscience. The author portrays tone by mood manipulation and with the use of descriptive diction to better express his perspective in the story, bringing the reader into the mind of the murderer.
Raskolnikov lives an ordinary life as an ordinary man. He is a good man and has a good heart, but he soon commits a crime that will forever change his life. Raskolnikov is a good man; I believe he is kind, generous, and selfless. Now, how are all of these positive traits found in a murderer? I think was caught in a psychotic moment, his mental state was not all there, and he had a dream, he made a plan, and he committed this terrible crime. A good example of Raskolnikov being a kind hearted person, and selfless is when he sees a young girl at the end of the street, he sees by her a rough looking man staring at her. He starts to get very worried what this man might do to this young girl. He goes down the street to get this young girl, and he pays for a taxi to get her home. This was so generous, and small yet so impactful. Raskolnikov cared about what might happen to this young girl, and did something about it. This showed how selfless Raskolnikov is, and what a kind heart he has. I think this shows Raskolnikov’s true character. From here, he makes some terrible decisions, and is engulfed by guilt, but I believe he is a generous, kindhearted person. In this book, Crime And Punishment, Raskolnikov goes from being an ordinary man with an ordinary life to a murderer, tortured by guilt, haunted by the memory of his crime, and him finding himself again in society after the murders.
Often times in literature, we are presented with quintessential characters that are all placed into the conventional categories of either good or bad. In these pieces, we are usually able to differentiate the characters and discover their true intentions from reading only a few chapters. However, in some remarkable pieces of work, authors create characters that are so realistic and so complex that we are unable to distinguish them as purely good or evil. In the novel Crime and Punishment, Fyodor Dostoevsky develops the morally ambiguous characters of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov to provide us with an interesting read and to give us a chance to evaluate each character.
Crime and Punishment, written by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky; is a philosophical crime fiction novel. The story is very powerful in that it goes beyond the book and into the lives of the audience; making the audience feel some type of relation between themselves and the story. Dostoevsky was brilliant in creating a fictional world where the characters seem to be found within the audience, transitioning from a fictional story to a self-help book. He employes many life lessons in the story, which give the audience a new perspective on themselves.
Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment is a psychologically charged novel in which the primary element that plagues the protagonist, Rodion Raskolnikov, is not a person but rather an idea; his own idea. Raskolnikov has an unhealthy obsession with rendering himself into what he perceives as the ideal, supreme human being, an übermensch. Raskolnikov forms for himself a theory in which he will live purely according to his own will and transcend the social norms and moralities that dominate society. Raskolnikov suggests that acts commonly regarded as immoral are to be reserved for a certain rank of “extraordinary” men. Raskolnikov’s faith
Throughout the novel, Crime and Punishment by Fydor Dostoyevsky, the author uses characters who are alienated from society, to highlight values of society they are rejected from. Sonia Marmeldov, becomes alienated from society mainly for going into prostitution at a young age and then for falling in love with a murderer. The murderer, Raskolnikov, also faces rejection for his actions, and he later goes to trial where people stick up for him.
Dostoyevsky most likely modeled Crime and Punishment after his own experiences. Since the two men's lives had striking similarities, many people believed that was evidence to prove their thinking. As Raskolnikov was overcome with tremendous suffering, sent to Siberia, and fell madly in love with a beautiful woman; so did Dostoyevsky within his lifetime. "I do believe that the character (Raskolnikov) was the epitome of Dostoyevsky's life." (Timoney)
Dostoyevsky gives the reader no such comfort. The reader wants to see Raskolnikov have some good excuse for killing the old woman, some sense of moral justification of the act so we can turn his accusers into "bad guys" and himself and his friends the "good guys". The reader gets nothing of the sort, Crime and Punishment is no fairy tale. The suspense in Crime and Punishment is caused by Dostoyevsky's superb characters, and the longing for a moral sense of right and wrong.
His desire is to use the old ladies money to help people who were imprisoned by poverty. Despite this, in the moment, he realizes that he was not “capable of seeing and reasoning” as a normal person would be (71). He knows that, in societies eyes, what he did was wrong, but he does not feel guilt over it. Had he felt guilty, he would have been able to make amends of the situation. As it was, he viewed it as more of an “atonement for forty sins” rather than a crime (446). Raskolnikov can reason, but he is emotionally motivated, and these emotions enhance his split personality. For this reason, the internal struggle increases as his emotions become