preview

Rate Of Return On Equity

Better Essays

Second Proposition: Rate of return on equity:
The second proposition of Modigliani and Miller it states that as the financial risk rise the higher the shareholders’ rate of return.
Financial leverage increases the risk of a shareholder since it increases the variability of the EPS and the ROE, this behaviour has got two directly proportion effects, Increase in the shareholders’ return however, it also increases the shareholders’ financial risk.
As per this effect the shareholders’ are expected to increase their return to be able to cover the higher risk that they are going through.
Unlevered firms who has got no debt; their opportunity cost of capital is equal to their cost of equity this means that the unlevered firm has got no risk, …show more content…

According to this figure the WACC was not affected by the capital structure, it remained constant regardless the increase of equity, this means that without including taxes the firm’s value is not affected by the capital structure. (Kaplan Financial Knowledge Bank, 2012)

The Second Proposition with taxes:
As Modigliani and Miller did for the first proposition when they’ve included the effect of the tax, they’ve applied the same thing on the second proposition in 1963 to make their theory closer to reality.
In this proposition M&M stated that the corporate tax is equal to the current value of savings from taxes, in this matter we can conclude that debt percentage in the capital structure and the WACC are inversely proportional, companies would do that because according to the tax shield they pay less taxes when they’ve got debt in their capital structure as shown in the Figure 2 below. (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2010).

According to (Pan, 2012) firms can benefit from having a higher percentage of debt in their capital structure because of the tax shield, this will decrease the WACC while the value of the firm will increase.

Third Proposition: Irrelevance of the Dividend Policy:
Modigliani and Miller in their study that was published in the journal of business “Dividend policy, Growth and valuation of shares” stated that the dividend policy is not important for the value of the firm. M&M argued in this proposition that in

Get Access