Ratifying The Constitution Dbq

People had many different opinions on the ratification of the Constitution. There were Federalists and Anti-Federalists that debated on many topics of the Constitution. The main reasons were: what type of government the United States of America should have, the people controlling our government, and some of the powers they should have. The Federalists were the ones who wanted change. They wanted to make changes to the government that was originally proposed. The Federalists wanted the government to protect the people, but not abuse their powers. They wanted to have the powers divided between the national and the state governments. The Constitution also stated that the government

During the early nineteenth century the United States began to split, but at the middle of the century people views started to become more concrete and so separation in the Union became more drastic. From 1850 to 1861 it was apparent that the union was separating into the North and the South. The Constitution played a major role in the separation that was occurring. Through sectional favoritism of bits and pieces of the Constitution and through ideas that were left out of it, the Constitution led to sectional discord and nearly the failure of the union.

The Constitution had changes the United States greatly. The document, written in 1788, was a powerful representation of the government back then, and amazingly, it’s still in play today. During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government and the constitution. The two parties were the Federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was best for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness in the national economy. Also, the Federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt

Without the need for change by the articles of confederation for the separation of both political parties, there would have not been a vision of whether or not our society would be this way in the first place. This was probably the most important factor to take in, as they truly thought about how this would work out in the future for the fate of The American Government. However, there seems to be an outlier in this situation, about whether or not the current government has truly separated from concerns with the past regarding our doings of rights and wrongs. This can tie towards the form of government of today and be utilized to the fact that the role of government has not changed since thus making sense that the Federalist and Anti-Federalist without a doubt had to be

The ratification of the US Constitution in 1787 sparked a ferocious and spiteful debate between two large groups of people, those who supported the ratification and those who did not. Both sides were very passionate about their ideas yet they were so divergent, as one believed that the ratification could create a more powerful, unified country, while others worried about the government gaining perhaps too much control. The supporters and opponents equally had various strong reasons in their beliefs regarding the ratification of the US Constitution, the most common for the supporters being that the current government was heading badly, and a ratification would fix all the mistakes made originally and set the course for a successful government. On the other hand, the biggest concern for the opponents was that the ratification would give the government too much power, and there would be no controlling force to keep the government in its place.

After the Founding Fathers of America wrote our Constitution there was one more step they had to each achieve in order for it to go into effect: ratifying it. In order to ratify the Constitution nine out of the thirteen states had to agree to adopt it. The process of ratifying the Constitution turned into a debate between two groups: the Federalists and the Anti Federalist.

The Articles of Confederation were the United State’s first constitution that was drafted in 1776 and set in motion a year later. The Articles of Confederation also known as “The Aoc”, ran the US government successful through the time of the American Revolution. However, the Aoc didn’t permit the national government with the power to levy taxes or regulate commerce, as a result of that all efforts at national cohesion was disheartened. So during the summer of 1787 they decided to create the “Supreme law of the land”, The Constitution. The constitution did everything the Aoc couldn’t do, it established more laws and provided increased federal authority while protecting the basic rights of it’s citizens.

New Hampshire ratifies the Constitution in a majority vote and suggests 12 alterations. Since New Hampshire is the 9th state out of 13 to ratify the Constitution, it is officially established.

Then there were Anti- Federalists who believed that the bulk of duties should continue to be left to each state's own discretion, so that there would be no misrepresentation of the people it governed. It's left to say that neither side saw eye to eye, but would eventually reach a "compromise", the Federalists would institute their version of the Constitution which had a clear notion of Central Government and it's duties. The Anti-Federalists would receive an additional amendment to the Constitution (The Bill of Rights), which would protect the personal liberties they were convinced a Central Government would revoke. Both sides seemed fairly satisfied with the outcome, though there was still fear of that popular tyranny from the outside. But the act of tyranny they should have feared was their own, for the Framer's motives for creating a new constitution was really protecting the few (the rights of the Wealthy) against the many (the non-elite).

The ratification of the Constitution was a crucial and momentous turning point in the history of American government. Although this renowned document created much more structure within the national government than it did under the Articles of Confederation, North Carolina was extremely against the ratification of the Constitution. With a strong majority of Anti-Federalist delegates during the debate throughout the ratification convention, North Carolina was called into session twice, in Hillsborough and Fayetteville, where the Anti-Federalists fought diligently for an explicit Bill of Rights to protect individual rights and maintain state economic stability, while the Federalists attempted to assuage the Anti-Federalists’ refusal to accept

2. If you had been alive in 1787 would you have supported the ratification of the Constitution or not? Explain why. If I had been alive in 1787, I would have supported the ratification of the US constitution. During this era in our country had just won the American Revolution and was looking for a great change to happen. The constitution gave citizens fundamental law for the government, without these laws there would be complete and utter chaos.

Madi Shek VSP 3 After the Articles of Confederation were found to be flawed, the Constitutional Convention was called in an attempt to fix the still young United States government. During the Constitutional Convention a new Constitution was formed and then proposed to the people. Mercy Otis Warren was one of the many Anti Federalists who wanted to reject the Constitution. She feared that the government would become tyrannical which in her eyes would render the War for Independence useless. Warren claimed that the proposed Constitution was disloyal to the American Revolution when she stated that it would “threaten to sweep away the rights for which the brave sons of America have fought” (Warren 1788).

Constitutional Convention After the Declaration of Independence, the colonies realized how vital a central government is and recognize their need for one. This change doesn’t come easy, on the contrary, there are several disputes on the abolishment of the Articles of Confederation and how this new form of government should be created and how it will be run. George Washington came out of retirement stating that an amendment to the Articles of Confederation was in order (Document A). In order to come up with all the necessary roles, the states are called into the Constitutional Convention.

A piece of paper to cause so much controversy between opposing viewpoints that only persuasion would convince the nine out of thirteen American states. A room full of rich white men sharing all of their knowledge to create a document that will change America forever. George Washington, an advocate for the Constitution as well as the ratification of it, was willingly pulled out of retirement to serve as a delegate at the Constitutional Conventions as well as a popular leader according to many. Washington's views on the independence of America as well as his Federalist mindset towards the Ratification of the Constitution was able to later name himself the first President of the United States (Hamilton, Hubbard, Janda).

The dual citizenship under the dual federalism, with a case called Barron versus Baltimore brought back the old debate about the Bill of Rights. Dual federalism by making almost states more powerful as national government is led partly to a war that had changed the face of the United States. The civil war (1861-1865) broke up between southern states and northern states. It was basically a fight between the Union (national government) against some revolted states that were motivated by the dissolution of the Union. It ended by finally reinforcing more the powers to the