Ratio analysis for TUI Travel

The gross profit margin measures the amount of profits that a company generates from its operations without consideration of its indirect costs. Thehigher thegross profit margin, the greater the efficiency of a company’s operations (Besley & Brigham 2007). It means that the company is generating enough income to cover its operating expenses. On the contrary, a lower gross profit margin indicates that the business is not generating adequate income to cover its operating expenses.

The gross profit ratio indicates that Next plc was able to maintain their gross profit. It has decreased insignificantly by 0.05%. In 2011

Gross profit is defined as the difference between Sales and Cost of Sales. The gross margin (or gross profit ratio) expresses the gross profit as a proportion of net sales. The gross profit margin ratio measures how efficiently a company uses its resources, materials, and labour in the production process by showing the percentage of net sales remaining after subtracting the cost of making and selling a product or service. It indicates the profitability of a business before overhead costs. The higher the percentage, the more the business retains of each dollar of sales. So: the higher the gross profit margin ratio, the better.

* In 2005, the profit was approximately ($144,000 / $5,500,000) 2.6% of sales; does this number indicate whether the company is doing well or not?

The Gross Margin ratio represents the percent of total sales revenue that TCI retains after incurring the direct costs associated with producing the goods and services sold by them. It helps us distinguish, as much as possible, between fixed and variable costs. With a 20%, 15%, or 10% projected increase in sales, for 1996, we calculated TCI’s GM ratio to be 41.85% , and in 1997 to be 41.84%. This means that around 42% of TCI’s sales dollar is available to pay for fixed costs, like its potential long-term debt to MidBank, and to add to profits.

In the Table __ and Fig __, you can see how the company has been performing. The overall profitability of the company has increased. Profitability ratios have increased since 2010. In particular, Harvey Norman’s Gross Profit Margin saw a significant growth, it grew 44.7% since 2010. Operating Profit Margin saw a similar result, finishing with a ratio of 10.5 in Financial Year 2015. Harvey Norman’s Net Profit Margin (when positive), have been at best maximum and are further illustrative of the paper-thin margins typically associated with the retail sector. Investments of Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) were also substantial, comparing 2010 and 2015 there was a relative decrease in ROA and ROE which doesn’t make much of a difference if the Gross Profit Margin has a strong game. Thus, on the basis of the financial results over the last 6 years, shareholders would definitely be confident about investing in Harvey Norman, unless there is a decline in current asset and equity returns.

$10,644,800 / $2,271,400 = 4.69 Times Return on Common Stockholders’ Equity (2002) $647,645 / $1,928,960 = 33.58% Return

It basically shows the increase in the net profit of the company from the previous year. The net profit of Barratt increased by a staggering 308.84%, while the net profit of Persimmon increased only by 44.63%. Gross profit margin ratio shows the amount of revenue which remains after paying the cost of products sold. The gross profit margin of Barratt in 2013 was 13.78% and in 2014 it was 16.77%.

2. The process of profit margin. Given the profit margin range of 9.2% to 10.1% between the following ten years from 1989 to 1998, it is acceptable to assume that the margin rate was uniformly continuous with a 0.1% increase from year to year.

The Gross profit margin stays relatively constant at around 36 %. However, there is a slight rise from 2000 to 2004.

The Net Profit Margin in 2012 was 10.5% while in 2013 it was 66.6%. This increase in the Net Profit Margin can be attributed to the increase in net profits after taxes despite the fact that there was a slight decrease in revenues.

Operating profit margin figures in the table above show the return from net sales[13]. However profit margin ratios are high enough for the 3 years, there is a fall from 12.86% to 11.26% during 2011-12. Sales revenue increases with a higher rate than gross profit so there is a poor

Interest Expense Rate is continuously increasing from 1992 to onward. It shows that company is paying high financial charges over short term and long term borrowings.

Firms and Companies include ‘Ratios’ in their external report to which it can be referred as ‘highlights’. Only with the help of ratios the financial statements are meaningful. It is therefore, not surprising that ratio analysis feature are prominently in the literature on financial management. According to Mcleary (1992) ratio means “an expression of a relationship between any two figures or groups of figures in the financial statements of an undertaking”.

The results of the company’s return on assets ratio measuring profitability overall was 7.2% in 2010 and 8.1% in 2011 having an increase of 0.9%. Return of common stock ratio that portrays the