Re-Do 13: A Case Study

Facts Plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi, who is an anesthesiologist, was terminated under an oral contract stating for a specified term. This was caused by a dispute over the plaintiff and a ophthalmologist on how the proceeding should be on the specific surgery that happened that happened in the operating room which lead to an bigger argument. The ophthalmologist’s brother was the head of the anesthesia group. Then Feather River Anesthesia

Additionally, when interviewed, Ms. Daniel stated that at the time that the parties were negotiating the recruitment agreements, the Practice and Hospital did have an oral agreement with respect to Dr. Shakfeh’s existing patients. However, Ms. Daniel said the oral agreement was solely that Dr. Shakfeh would not be required to report income derived from the recruited physicians’ services to those patients of the Practice who were already pregnant and had seen Dr. Shakfeh prior to the time Dr. Gomez and Dr. Tabbaa joined the Practice. Ms. Daniel also stated that these “established patients” did not include patients who started coming to the Practice after Dr. Gomez and Dr. Tabbaa commenced their practice, regardless of whether Dr. Shakfeh had seen the patient in the past for a different pregnancy. There are other contemporaneous internal e-mails related to the alleged oral agreement in which Ms. Daniel and Mr. Shafer attempt to explain their understanding of this alleged agreement. However, it is undisputed that the alleged oral agreement was not incorporated into the recruitment agreements.

Pt's daughter, Ms. McDonald was upset that she was unable to see her father, however she understood the court order, and appeared to feel better once I informed her that Pt was not having surgery today. Ms. McDonald reported that she is working to have Attorney Hajjar removed as the Pt's

H had respect for the nursing profession and suggestion render for the care of the patient. The physicians did not examine the patient for himself to see if I have a valid point, he continues to treat the monitor and not the patient. As I analysis things that I could have done differently, one choice I could have done was go up the change of command until the problem was fixed. Another action would be, to insist on DR. H walking 20 steps to the patient room to examine the patient when I notice the change and not just the monitor and labs. I could have stopped the fluids until the patient was examined as well as the x-ray was done. Unfortunately, the patient passed after a long code. That day has change how I handled conflicts with a physician. That day I felt that I had fallen my patient. I go up the change and I don’t care if the physician feels that I’m going over their heads. Furthermore, I am not timid when it comes to voicing my concern about how the doctors are handling patient

Dr. DoRight has recently been hired as the President of the "Universal Human Care Hospital", where he oversees all departments with over 5,000 employees and over 20,000 patients at the medical facility. Dr. DoRight discovers that some patients within the hospital have been dying as a result of a variety of illegal procedures by doctors and nurses, and negligent supervision and oversight on their part. After two years, there have been no results from the investigation and some patients are still passing away due to the negligent activities. In this research paper I will discuss what Dr. DoRight, of Universal Human Care Hospital will do when he discovers that patients within the hospital have been dying as a result of a variety of illegal procedures by doctors and nurses and negligent supervision and oversight on their part.

The primary barrier impeding effective interaction among the personnel is a communication barrier. Information exchanges between the patient’s primary care provider and other care providers are often where errors occur or where information is lost. Two-way communication between the surgeon’s office and the hospital is necessary for effective and efficient patient care. Consequently, there does not appear to be an effective channel of communication with the surgeon’s office to obtain appropriate documentation which would have included the patient’s custodial information. Secondly, the pre-op nurse was in an emotionally charged situation due to the stress of an increased workload and additional responsibilities. Although, the appropriate

Just to let you know that I just finish working with Lisa all the Dental advance payments from the Dover location.I did all the dental corrections that she told me and post all the money that was on sitting on unassigned . The process take us long to do it b/c was a lot of errors from PMG when they post the charges and the adjustments from 2015 dental visits. The good new is that the Dental Dover location is clean now. She will be calling me on Tuesday againg so can do the 4th street location. She said that we did two full pages of corrections for the Dover side and now she feel more

Furthermore, he was the only reliable person, whose collaboration was very significant for me. The end result was that as a nurse, I remained an outsider in my patient care and was not able to provide education about her prognosis and treatment. I thought, if I get some cooperation from doctor side, I might able to take some steps in order to prepare the patient from short term and long term goal. After that I thought if patient family member would stand in place of me, they may develop the same feeling which I had developed. If I put my self in doctor’s shoes, I may develop the same pathetic response which doctor had developed. Here my personal bias came. I thought that doctor is the one who convince their patient by their proper education and sympathetic nature. But, by looking at the response of that doctor, I generalized the act of one medical staff with all the paramedical staff and create negative feeling about all of them as well.

The process in which to file a civil complaint against a physician is to first contact the facility’s medical board. If the complaint is within jurisdiction, within the seven year time frame, and shows evidence of breach of duty, causation, and harm or injury, the person who complained will receive an acknowledgement letter advising them that the board has received their complaint and that it will be forwarded to an analyst for review. If the complaint concerns the care and treatment received, copies of the medical records will be requested by the analyst and a written summary of their care from the physician, along with the authorization for release of medical information. The analyst will contact any subsequent physician(s) listed on the authorization forms. When all requested documents have been received, the person who complained with received a notice stating that all their information including the complaint(s) has been sent to medical consultants for review. The reviews are

On April 26, 2016, Jonathan Shimkus reported that at around 3:00 pm, you asked him if you could leave at 3:15 pm for a dental appointment. Jonathan indicated that he said to you that you could leave for your appointment, however, he was not able to approve the unplanned absence you requested. That request would have to be submitted to either Paul or me. Jonathan stated to me that you left work at 3:15 pm as requested.

Unfortunately, this would not be an easy task. My responsibilities would to look a little closer to the files of the workmen’s compensation cases. Doing so will help make things clear so when I call the proper authorities I will have facts. I would also try to find a way to ask the physician in question are the diagnosis and procedure correct before even thinking of billing for them.

He quickly became upset and told me to go outside the office. I followed him out because he started to make a scene in the lobby and I had patients and parents waiting. He stated, “I’m here to make sure that the children are safe,” and questioning the level of health and safety that takes place in our office and asking whether or not I was a parent. I started to feel uncomfortable and felt intimidated by his change of tone and the fact that he told me to go outside where there were no witnesses and I wasn’t sure what his intentions were. He also said that the reason I was delaying his inspection was due to, “us covering up something.” The allegations that he was making made me extremely uncomfortable. I repeatedly asked him to wait patiently and that I was verifying some information before letting him. When we went back inside the office, Dr. Munoz began questioning Dr. Liou’s right to practice in the sedation center. Instead of asking for documentation, he pulled out his cell phone to show me on what appeared to be the Floridahealth.gov website, that Dr. Liou did not have the sedation center office as a practicing location. I advised him that on March 14, 2018, Dr. Liou added the sedation center as a second location to his license and

I will like to express my general satisfaction in the position I currently hold in Kokroo Medical Associates, But I would like to draw your attention to one particular matter that is a bit unsettling for me.

We regret to inform you that your employment with Metropolitan Neurosurgery is terminated effective upon receipt of this memo for the following reasons during your probation period:

First of all we would like to thank Mr Dominic Lococo for giving us this wonder-ful opportunity to work as part of a group and examine and understand a case.