preview

Reaction Paper II: Economic Restructuring

Decent Essays

Introduction:
There are three frameworks or approaches in the examination of poverty: the neo-classical conservative, the liberal and the radical schools. In this paper, I argue that the radical school of thought best approaches poverty from a standpoint that allows for the liberation of minorities from hegemonic norms. First, I will examine the conservative school understanding of poverty and how they inadequately address the values and views of minorities that result in oppressive policies. Second, I will critique the liberal school and how that paradigm also ineffectively acknowledges the perspectives of minorities that also lead to policies that are unjust. Finally, I will review the radical school and demonstrate how this framework …show more content…

Unlike the conservative school, the liberal schools sees the cause of poverty resulting from loss of jobs, super ghettos, poor education (Wacquant, L., Wilson J. 1989). Essentially poverty to the liberal occurs naturally resulting from the relationship an individual has with his or her geographical space. The liberal school also postulates their policy research as independent and unbiased (Schram, 1995). Wilson (1996) shows how the above liberal assumptions result in research whose methods focus more on the impoverished individual relationship as being formed by the space the individual lives in (Schram, 1995). Space impacts upon the individual and the liberal school avoids any suggestion of wider mutually constituted relationships. Like the conservative school, the impartial supposition from the liberal view results in bias that avoids bringing in individual interpretation in research (Schram, 1995). As a result, the liberal ideology results in oppressive policies imposed upon the poor from outside sources and fail to address the wider jointly comprised spatial arrangements.
The Radical School: The radical school of thoughts presents the best understanding of poverty from the standpoint that liberates oppressed minorities. The radical perspective sees poverty stemming from larger structural issues (Morgan S., Acker J., et al., (2006). For example, Fujiwara (2006)

Get Access