Reaction Paper On The Apology Of Socrates

In the Apology, Socrates aimed to do three things: defend his ideas and principles, continue to teach those who will open their mind and state that he knew regardless of what he said he was aware that all five hundred and one jurors knew who he was and disliked him. Socrates was well aware of the fact that he had made multiple enemies, he knew that the politicians, poets, rich and craftsmen all

In the Apology Socrates is a very simple man he is Plato’s favorite character based on his personality of appearance. To convey his ideas about honesty and rightness. The peculiar of a method applied in Apology is about an argument which Socrates used to expressed by Plato in The Apology (Steven 29p) uses to defend himself in the course of a court-martial. Plato’s Apology is an example of how Socrates speech makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the city, The complaint of Socrates is based on fear people of the man’s thinking which inspires the youth by original ideas and exposure of the ignorance and corruption in the unawareness and dishonesty in the upper circles of the state. Socrates

According to the majority of the jury members of Athens, Socrates is a corruption to the youth, doer of evil and does not agree with the gods of his people. In the Apology, written by Plato these are the assumptions and accusations Socrates is held in court for. In court, he is faced with what most men fear, being wrongly accused leading to the death sentence. Socrates argues and strives to prove that he has no fear of being hated, being accused of serious crimes, being threatened with punishment, or being put to death.

The Apology of Socrates by Plato, is the dialogue that tells the story of Socrates legal self-defense, where he represents himself at his trial for impiety and corruption in 399 BC. Throughout the book Socrates tries to maintain his innocence. Apology of Socrates is essentially a defense against the charges of “corrupting the youth, not believing in gods in whom the city believes, but in other daimonia that are novel to Athens” (24b) Socrates challenges each of the charges he is brought up against. Socrates is brought up on three charges, corrupting the youth, challenging belief in the gods that were accepted and reveled by the State, and introducing a new religious

The Apology is a Plato’s version of the speech Socrates presented when defending himself against two official charges and two “old charges”. The official charges are the only charges the jurors are to worry about, while the “old charges” are informal charges. These informal charges are rumors made about Socrates that Athenians have heard their whole life. These charges were brought to the courts attention by three accusers. The three accusers were Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon.

Plato’s Apology is one of the most well-known pieces of Plato’s writing today, perhaps due to a certain dramatic style and context that can appeal to any reader. The ‘Apology’ is the defence speech of Socrates before the court at a trial for his life. He has been accused of deliberately corrupting the young and of non-belief in the Athenians’ gods. It is widely accepted that this is a true event, Socrates was tried, found guilty and put to death. What is not known for certain is the accuracy of Plato’s account of his defence. David Leibowitz tells us that the Greek title is ambiguous and could mean a defence speech either for or by Socrates. From this it is hard to discern if the Apology as

Socrates’ criticism of craftsmen or experts in Apology is a direct criticism of Erixymachus’ speech in Symposium because Erixymachus’ profession as a doctor, like that of a craftsman, is one that requires expertise in a certain field. Although craftsmen are knowledgeable in their craft, their sense of entitlement from their success causes them to think that they are “wise in other most important pursuits… [an] error [which] overshadowed the wisdom they had” (Apology 22E). Hence, Socrates thinks that one is better off with “neither [the craftsmen’s] wisdom nor their ignorance” (Apology 22E).

Socrates was a particular man who truly marked the story of philosophy with his method. He was born and raised in Athens, he was issue from a modest family. And he never focused on his external appearance, but on the mind, who people think was his preoccupation. He was spanning his days walking down the street, try to stop people who were going to their daily occupations, and discuss with hem about different subjects concerning their everyday live. What could be his motivations and the objective of his questioning?

Socrates is quite the unique individual compared to most, if not all, other Greeks at that time. In the Apology, Socrates gives an analogy of himself being a gadfly and that his gadfly like actions are favorable for Athens and that the actions are goods he is providing. From his service he claims to live a more private life than a public life when discussing virtue. This paper is going to discuss Socrates and his analogy of a gadfly, approach to others about virtue, his conduct effect on democracy, and a comparison to a contemporary person that is similar to him.

There are many writers, authors, and speakers in this world that are considered among the greats, but perhaps the greatest two of western speculation are Plato and Socrates. These two hand in hand had a huge influence on American Literature and others as well. Perhaps one of the most remarkable writings of Plato, since Socrates never once himself wrote anything down, is his writing of Apology. The writings of Apology showed some of Socrates final moments, how he carried himself, and most importantly what he said. Socrates was perhaps one of the most intellectual and perceptive minds that ever lived this life, and he had many important ideas and most specifically questions. There are many important things to be derived and learned from the writings of Plato, and voice of Socrates. From Plato’s Apology I learned three important things; how to question society, how to defend oneself with poise, and most importantly, “That the unexamined life is not worth living.” according to Socrates.

Socrates died after his attempt to persuade the Athenians by telling the truth during a time when truthfulness was of little concern. I found unit 3 to be extremely interesting because I never knew about the trial or death of Socrates. Socrates is known as the father of Greek Philosophy and was put on trial by citizens of Athens in 399 399 B.C.E. for allegedly corrupting the youth and Impiety. Unit 3 allowed me to examine the trial and learn about the attitudes of people in Athens during this era. The title of the dialogue I learned about was, The Apology. The Apology was dialogue written by Plato, one of Socrates student’s and admirers, in an attempt to defend Socrates’ reputation after his death. It is a description of the speech that Socrates gave when he was on trial for the alleged crimes. Learning about the trial of Socrates was interesting to me because it caused me to examine the way criminal indictments has changed over the years.

Plato’s The Apology is the speech that Socrates makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, creating new deities, and corrupting the youth of Athens. Even though the title of Socrates’ speech is The Apology, it is not an apology for his actions, but rather he attempts to defend himself and his conduct. The apology has made me reflect on whether a person should focus on improving himself or herself, or should they focus on improving other people.

The Apology of Socrates,by Plato,is an important work of literature. Although written some two-thousand years ago,it shows us how our society is much like the one of Socrates.It shows how the equities and inequities of his time are like the one's today.In reading the Apology of Socrates,one can learn how consistency can lead to equitableness.

Throughout various Socratic works, this theme is re occurring. As oppose to just satisfying ones immediate desires, one must be virtuous. According to the will of the gods, life, which is well lived, prosperous and long, is not necessarily a good life.

Perhaps in the present moment, there would have been no such information on philosophy and it’s influences without the existence of Socrates. Socrates was an individual who was acknowledged as an eminent philosopher. We have received his intelligence from others who have documented his speeches, due to the fact that in the past, he had not personally recorded himself. I find it rather intriguing that despite the fact that Socrates, alongside his pupils, have endured life many years ago, it is still pertinent in todays society. I have appointed myself to compose about Socrates’s dialogue on “The Apology”. Socrates is notorious for his wisdom, in conjunction with his competence to prevail upon you that your dictums are spurious and that his, in fact, are equitable. I have also come to the agreement to write about “The Apology” by reason of that this is the closest to him that we will ever get too. Additionally, “The Apology” is inherently the inauguration of Western Philosophy.