Reaction (rate) between magnesium ribbon and hydrochloric acid

2. Obtained a 2-3 cm strip of magnesium metal ribbon and coiled it loosely into a small ball. Added the magnesium metal to the acid in the test tube.

During the immersion of the magnesium metal in the hydrochloric acid solution, white bubbles could be seen escaping the surface of the metal as gas was produced during the reaction. Depending on the temperature of the hydrochloric acid and the overall molar concentration, the rate of reaction differed but the same signs were shown. During the reaction between the magnesium metal and higher concentrations of hydrochloric acid, it was observed that the test tube grew quite warm to the touch. As the immersed magnesium strip sank down, it appeared coated in a layer of white bubbles that fizzed like a carbonated drink. In the lower concentrations of hydrochloric acid, the strip spent some time floating at the surface of the solution in the test tube, later sinking down to the bottom as the

3. The third source of error is not knowing for how long to exactly heat the magnesium until it no longer ignites and forms into a white powder of magnesium oxide. In the procedure, it is stated for how long to heat the magnesium, but as the lab went on, it is realized that the magnesium had to be heated for a longer time. This could mean that the magnesium could have been not heated long enough or too little for it to be fully converted into the magnesium oxide product effecting the final results of the lab by having smaller

The aim of the lab was to determine the molar enthalpy of the combustion of magnesium using values from reactions between magnesium and magnesium oxide in hydrochloric acid solution using Hess’s Law and Calorimetry. The calculated molar enthalpy of the combustion of magnesium from this experiment was -633.6KJ/mol. This result was found by putting a known mass of magnesium metal as well as magnesium oxide powder into a concentration of HCl. Firstly, a styrofoam calorimeter was used to determine the standard reaction temperature of magnesium metal and hydrochloric acid. Next, calorimetry was again used to determine the reaction temperature of magnesium oxide and hydrochloric acid. Lastly, the thermochemical equations for the two

    In this lab, a calorimeter was used to find the enthalpy of reaction for two reactions, the first was between magnesium and 1 molar hydrochloric acid, and the second was between magnesium oxide and 1 molar hydrochloric acid. After the enthalpy for both of these were found, Hess’ law was used to find the molar enthalpy of combustion of magnesium, using the enthalpies for the two previous reactions and the enthalpy of formation for water. The enthalpy of reaction for the magnesium + hydrochloric acid reaction was found to be -812.76 kJ. The enthalpy of reaction for the magnesium oxide + hydrochloric acid reaction was found to be -111.06 kJ. These two enthalpies and the enthalpy of formation for water were manipulated and added together using Hess’s law to get the molar enthalpy of combustion of magnesium. It was found that the molar enthalpy of combustion of magnesium was -987.5 kJ/mol. The accepted enthalpy was -601.6 kJ/mol, which means that there is a percent difference of 64%. This percent difference is very high which indicates that this type of experiment is very inefficient for finding the molar enthalpy of combustion of magnesium. Most likely, a there are many errors in this simple calorimeter experiment that make it inefficient for finding the molar enthalpy of combustion of magnesium.

The reaction was then reduced with acid to protonate the carboxylate salt which yields a carboxylic acid product. By adding acid, it also dissolved any excess magnesium metal, so a liquid-liquid extraction can occur to isolate the product. A liquid-liquid extraction was used since the experiment involved a liquid solvent that removed a liquid component from the liquid mixture. A solid-liquid extraction would have been used if components were being removed from a solid by using a

I could use a gas syringe to collect the gas that will evolve from my

About 80 mL of HCl was obtained and mixed with phenolphthalein. Using a LabQuest unit and Gas Pressure Sensor kit, the HCl mixture was added to the flask with the magnesium ribbon and allowed to react. When reaction was complete, the change of temperature and gas was recorded. This procedure was repeated for different masses of magnesium ribbon (masses found on page 89 of the lab manual). After the completed procedure, moles of H₂ produced in each trial were calculated. (The actual procedure can be found on pages 87-89 of the lab manual)

The experiment was successfully achieved the purpose of this lab: to determine the concentration of Mg2+ using compleximetric tritation. During the experiment, the color in the unknown solution was successfully changed

Experiment 2 focused on finding the enthalpy of solution of magnesium chloride. Testing the enthalpy of solution started with measuring out 10 mL of deionized water in a graduated cylinder for three separate trials, each trial having a different mass of magnesium chloride. The water was then poured into a well of a Styrofoam calorimeter then the initial temperature of water was taken using a temperature probe and the LoggerPro programming. A measured amount of magnesium chloride was placed in the same well as the water in the calorimeter,

The goal of this experiment was to determine the empirical formula for a hydrate of magnesium sulfate and water. The technique that was used was measure the mass of the hydrate and then apply heat to evaporate the water. Then determine the mass of water that was in the hydrate and the mass of the remaining magnesium sulfate. The equation for the hydrate is determined by calculating the mole to mole ratio of the water and the anhydrous. The resulting formula will be formated as: MgSO4*_H2O

It is expected that the concentration of hydrochloric acid will increase the rate of the reaction between magnesium ribbon and hydrochloric acid. By increasing the concentration of

The ribbon is not. The crucible is heated for another 10 minutes. Step 9 is repeated until the ribbon become whitish. Then the crucible is allowed to cool.

I would have to measure the amount of hydrogen produced in regular intervals which would change for each concentration. Again, I would need approximately six or seven results to create enough points to put on a graph graph. Collecting Gas using a Syringe Equipment needed: -Scales; -Conical flask; -Gas syringe; -Stand with clamp; -Hydrochloric acid (30 ml); -Magnesium strip (2cm long); -Rubber tube with bung. The graph will have an independent variable and a dependant variable.

Overall, the results were almost as expected. It was predicted that Magnesium and Calcium would have a similar reaction will the hydrochloric acid and produce approximately that same quantity of hydrogen gas. However, the results demonstrated that the Calcium reacted more vigorously than expected and produced a larger quantity of hydrogen gas. The reaction which occurred whilst using Magnesium resulted exactly like the prediction. It was expected that the metal would bubble, eventually dissolve and produce gas which would potentially displace the water in the test tube. With the reaction involving Calcium, it was not predicted that it would heat up the conical flask and react as violently. It was expected that the Tin would either have a