Reactions to Hooks’ Feminism is for Everybody Essay

“If my generation was too naïve, the generations that have followed may be too practical. We knew too little, and now girls know too much.” (Sandberg. Pg. 646) In the past, the call for women’s rights was heated as much as it was alive; many women today believe that they no longer need feminism in their lives. The misconception that feminist ideals are outdated has lead modern women to fall short in their desire to accomplish more. Sheryl Sandberg refuels feminist goals in the article “Lean In: What Would You Do If You Weren’t Afraid.” She addresses lack of females in the work force, as well as, the way society prompts boys compared to girls. Bell Hook, in contrast, provides a deeper understanding of feminist ideals, along with, an in depth analysis of Sandberg’s work. The articles written by Bell Hook and Sheryl Sandberg express each woman’s perspective on modern feminism; although they both call for action, Sandberg focuses on the inequality between the sexes, while Hook broadens the overall argument to include topics such as race, sexuality and class equality.

bell hook is a famous feminist author who wrote the book “Feminism Is For Everybody” hooks attempt to create a quick, simple start on feminist history, theory, and politics to the masses who receive a misinformation, misunderstood, and maligned version of the feminist movement. Hooks says “To understand feminism it implies one has to necessarily understand sexism”.We define feminism as the advocacy of women 's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men.Where she simply define and shows that being feminism does not mean women have to become mean or they are better than men,she simply saying that men and women need to be equal like the civil right movements. The book begins with a brief statement of feminist political positions, then discusses some history of the movement.She discusses the change in the movement from personal to groups where women have close relationships with one another and began to feel personally empowered by their participation in the establishment of large, and how some women feel like they are working for the high middle-class women.Every single time it doesn’t matter you a women or men, you will always have someone in the higher level than you.hooks feel like it will very exciting for the women who have the power to work with other so they could build each other up..Hooks views the formation of large women’s organizations as the beginning of a stage where the movement took on the role of

The Rhetoric of gender equality: An Analysis of Bell Hooks “Dig Deeper: Beyond Lean In”

Bell Hooks was born in Kentucky on September 25, 1952. She went to all black schools until she was in high school, and after the shift to an integrated school she felt that black students were seen as not “really belonging” she says this experience “taught [her] the difference between education as the practice of freedom and education that merely strives to reinforce dominance.”(teaching to transgress 4). After high school she received her bachelor’s degree from stanford university and her master’s degree from UC Santa Cruz. She experienced racial and sexual discrimination throughout her life, and when she was in college, Bell Hooks was exposed to the women’s liberation movement; a feminist movement from the 1970’s that fought for issues that affected women. This movement gave her an outlet to express her ideas about feminism. Bell Hooks fought for women’s rights through literature and created a more inclusive feminist movement by exploring how race and class factor into women’s oppression.

After reading the book “Feminism for everybody” by Bell Hooks, I found out that the name feminism itself is a big problem because it makes men to think that women were blaming and insulting their gender instead of fight for their equal rights. Therefore, they are raising issues like violence, patriarchy and domination to proof that men’s were monsters, so men should don’t deserve more rights than them. So the way of women protests get equalities is not right because it hurts men’s and force them to think that women were trying to say that their gender is better they should get more priorities than men’s instead of being both gender equal. By looking all these problems, I also think name feminism itself, not a good name for this movement because

In chapter 12 of Feminism is for Everybody, Hooks talks about the early feminist movement. Hooks explains that in the beginning of the feminist movement women began the movement out of anger and resentment of men who they felt oppressed by. Some women took the route of hating men and wanting nothing more than to oppress men. The majority of women realized that the problem was not men but rather the sexist ideologies and standards that men were made to take on. Mass media choose to focus on the feminist women who placed their priority on hating men. They called them lesbians and man haters.

“Most of us did not learn when we were young that our capacity to be self-loving would be shaped by the work we do and whether that work enhances our well-being.” – Bell Hooks

Based on your statement, it is evident that you are unaware about many important realities of the study of gender from a feminist perspective today. First, I think it is necessary to point out that it is a fallacy that the term “feminism,” the historical basis of the discipline of Women’s and Gender studies (WGS), is rooted in biases towards women and hate for men. In reality, as my Threshold Concepts text reveals, Bell Hooks defines feminism as “the struggle to end oppression,” noting that this definition then “directs our attention to systems of domination and inter-relatedness of sex [sic.], race, and class oppression” (Launius and Hassel, 4). Truly, feminism, and by extension WGS, delves into the oppression of minority groups by dominant groups. This means that it affects and involves all people, not just plainly men and women, revealing its relevance and importance to you, me, and everyone else.

Bell Hooks, the author of Feminist Politics: Where We Stand, writes about how feminism started, progressed and came to be. I agree with Hooks main point, “to understand feminism it implies one has to necessarily understand sexism” (255) and the insight on the true definition, “feminism is a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression” (255), a definition from her previous book called Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Hooks writes on the different kinds and perceptions of feminism: contemporary, reformist, revolutionary, and lifestyle, while pointing out a shared view, the hatred of men. I agree with Hooks attitude, that feminism is not truly the hatred of men, and that the accurate definition has been lost or unclear.

Directions: Careful and critical reading of bell hooks’ Feminism is for Everybody. After reading your assigned chapters, answer the following questions thoroughly before your class presentation and submit through blackboard.

In the Feminist Theory, bell hooks provide vivid examples and assertions on how mainstream feminism exclude the issues of women of color. Mainstream feminism in America pertains to the ideals of “white, middle-class privileged woman” as they “reinforce white supremacy by negating the issue of race and class amongst woman of color” (hooks, 2000, pg. ). Due to not fulfilling the attempt to gain equality, as they may claim to do, it also can be an organization that displays “narcissism, insensitivity, sentimentality, and self-indulgence” (hooks, 2000, pg. 3). As mainstream feminism shuns the needs and interests of African-American women, it allows current social issues and inequalities to persist.

An important concept described by Hooks in Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics is the feminist movement that was the challenging of the idea of what beauty is. Hooks wrote “Challenging sexist thinking about the female body was one of the most powerful interventions made by contemporary feminist movement. Before women’s liberation all females young and old were socialized by sexit thinking to believe that our value rested solely on appearance and whether or not we were perceived to be good looking, especially by men. Understanding that females could never be liberated if we did not develop healthy self-esteem and self-love feminist thinkers went directly to the heart of the matter; critically examining how we feel and think about

According to Hooks (2000) as cited in Considine and Dukelow (2009:141) “Feminism is a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression”. It is necessary to explain the different types of feminism that are present in society first. Freedman

In the article "Understanding Patriarchy” by Bell Hooks, the ideology of patriarchy is presented to her audience while she explains some of the basics of feminism and how they relate to current challenges to gender roles. Hook begins the article by establishing her relevance to the topic by giving specific examples of her childhood living in a patriarchal home. She explains in detail some of the occurrences growing up in an isolated area in a home with patriarchal views and how they affected her. Hook then transitions into her professional life as a feminist and shows her views on patriarchy, gender roles, and gives a possible solutions to the societal issues brought about by patriarchy. The relevance of patriarchy is brought to the forefront in this article addressing the cultural denial of patriarchy by society. Hook explains how children growing up even in single parent families or non-patriarchal families still get patriarchal ideologies from the world around them. Approaching the end of the article Hook begins to go into detail on the impacts of patriarchal views on both men and women. Hook references patriarchy’s impact on gender roles. She pleads for the acknowledgment of patriarchy and its harmful effects on society and focuses on its effects on males. Hook concludes by giving a solution to the ill effects of patriarchy, stating it must be taken seriously, and addressed by men and women alike.

In Feminist Theory: from margin to center, bell hook states on the first page what she believes to be the problem with feminism. In her opinion the biggest problem with feminism is that there is no real definition of what feminism is. The definition many people have formulated for feminism is having the goal of making woman socially equal to men. hook’s problem with this is the fact that all men are not socially equal. If women are to be the social equals to men then another question would be which men women will be socially equal to. While many white middle and upper class women accept this definition, the lower socioeconomic classes can not because it does not take race and its disadvantages