Reasons For Banning Social Promotion

Schools lacking social utilities that are needed to promote the academic status of its students is an issue. Whether these utilities should be kept opened or closed is widely debated in most communities. The condition of such schools is an important issue because it determines the future of its students academically. Some issues facing schools include social, public and economical issues; this essay will consider arguments concerning the social, public and economical causes of this problem through the use of Jonathan Kozol's "TITLE OF ARTICLE", as well as the discussion of the reasons why some schools do not receive sufficient funds to care for public schools.

The goal of social mobility has not been relevant until recently. For example, in the mid-twentieth century, democratic equality was sought after due to the need for equal opportunity in schooling, no matter the socioeconomic background, race, gender, or handicap a child may have been impaired by. Education soon became increasingly available to all social classes,

Forcing schools into not denying anyone and giving every child an equal chance. Especially when concerning gender.

Social problems are used as an excuse for many things not to mention school as well. For example when the state ranks all the schools in Jersey City, the schools that perform badly have many reasons to explain why. They use students who come from bad homes, who are troubled, suffer from poverty or whose parents are not very involved in their life or mistreat them as the reason why they ranked so low. The Board of Education, teachers, principals, counselors etc. come up with the many reasons of why they are doing so poorly and try and get to the root of the student and what type of issues they may have going on. It is completely understandable that children and teenagers who come from rough homes are not too focused on school and may see no point of learning. However, then we have other students that regardless of how bad their

Labaree states, that the purpose of all three has played a major role for a certain time in the history of education in the United States. Sometimes, one of these purposes supports and other times oppose each other. However, courtesy of these three, social mobility has a good chance to serve schooling’s goals, and satisfy all stakeholders as well. It has all the features and elements, which

First of all, year-round schooling should be banned because of summer jobs. Some kids may want to participate in summer jobs like teaching recreational sports or working at an ice cream stand. Therefore, if kids are at school they won't get time to work over the summer and some kids want the money to put towards college.

Verses the children of financially or knowledge bound families who argue that these children are just as good and deserve just as many opportunities. Though these are both valid discussions no one seems to be concerned enough to discover a better way to prevent these arguments. Yes, the government did attempt to create a system that would protect these students, yet, they failed to keep it from going dormant(https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/hq43ef.html . What, one may ask, are the repercussions of having students that are constantly in a state of competitiveness? One thing that has been a major problem is student attitude. As a student moves through elementary school and into middle it is not hard for them to realize the unneeded separation of classes. The lower class students develop an attitude that is based on “being like the other kids.” This attitude then turns from a simple jealous manner to a give up manner. Why would a student try their hardest to only have a teacher keep them at a C level because their clothes do not say polo or Nike? Students see this and their reaction is a direct result of the problems in the equal opportunity act. If students learn that their efforts are not worth anything, a whole generation learns that worthless feeling complex. That starts a new conversation beginning with how does the government support a generation that is not willing to work because their

Education is essential to attain social mobility, however students face difficult obstacles. Even though we have laws like No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), however many students that come from low social class families do not have equal opportunities as students that come from higher income households. NCLB is encouraging on its face, but it does not address the unequal distribution of funds for districts. NCLB set standards in which students must achieve scores on standardized test rather than having access to equal opportunities, in

After watching Waiting for Superman, I realize I haven’t given the schools I attended the credit they deserve when I have spoken of them before. I had no idea other schools in America could be failing worse than the elementary and high school I previously attended. Waiting for Superman gives a diverse view of how hard it is to actually get the free, public, education that every student is entitled to and deserving of. The documentary showcases five students along with their families trying to get into schools that guarantee them a better future. Because free, public, schools are failing the students by not giving them a proper education, these five students are left to look at private institutions with few spaces available.

But supporters of retention argue that these low-performing students stand to benefit from additional instruction before continuing on to more challenging material. However, during the 1960’s, concerns that retention hinders the social, emotional, and cognitive development of students led many educators to call for students to be advanced to the next grade with their peers regardless of their academic performance, or in laymen’s terms “social promotion.”

Most people believe that social messaging is more of a benefit than a consequence, but using social media can actually be harmful. Social media is something most kids, teens, and even some adults are using all the time. It has become a part of our generation’s lives. Having people on their phones all day long is not only disappointing, but also damaging. Instead of talking to someone face-to-face and hanging out, people prefer just texting or going on a social network. For some people understanding a life without social media is near impossible. Using social media can have some adverse effects such as: it causes cyberbullying, it can compromise education, and it could have an effect on social skills.

To counteract the discouraging data about grade retention, many school systems have instilled the policy of social promotion. The recent negativism surrounding the tradition of repeating a grade portends a return to social promotion. Social promotion, the antithesis of grade retention, is the automatic passing of a student on to the next grade at the end of the school year, despite his or her

Social promotion and retention are used for various reasons. Retention is implemented when students have not met the general requirements to begin the next grade. The question that will be addressed is how do social promotion and retention differ? The overall meaning of both will be addressed to give the reader a better understanding of the two. Social promotion is the practice of promoting a student to the next grade level even if the minimum academic factors have not been satisfied. Retention is the approach that is most widely practiced. This is the retention of a grade to reinforce academics. The pros and cons, static’s, and drop out rates will be discussed. All of these

Sure it saves us time, is more convenient from most people’s point of view, but is this a positive thing taking into consideration that this may well be the only point of contact many people have with others? Let’s consider the example of internet shopping. An individual can complete their order online via the internet and have their week’s supply of groceries at their doorstep with the hour. By accepting and embracing this type of behavior in lieu of convenience and a few moments of time we are actually doing society an injustice. The option must be left open to those who chose to live this type of life for instance younger people, but we should not close the door on the individuals that want, and need, to have this type of socialization in their everyday lives.

When children are put into educational facilities, they get a chance to connect and surround themselves with others of the same age group. Schools can also have significant influence on a person’s individuality as well as peer groups, which influence a student’s academic integrity greatly. A student will not perform well no matter what the case is, if there is negative influence from his peers and their school environment. They affect a person’s attitude, personality in a positive or negative manner.