Reasons For Gun Control

Most pro-gun ownership often supports their argument with the Second Amendment. However, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution doesn’t include or mention what types of firearms can be used for self-defense. It would be common sense to limit the sale of guns to handguns or small weapons to protect one’s life. America has the Second Amendment mainly because of the history and it’s been a long tradition of the American people. And it has been further reinforced when the Revolutionary war began and armed civilians or militias won America’s freedom. People don 't think about much of this history anymore, they care more for what the law states rather than how it got started or why it’s been implemented. And because of this lack of interest “attempts to restrict a citizen’s right to own a gun evoke

Throughout the years there have been numerous of debate confrontations about regardless of whether weapon control is a decent answer for the United States. Therefore, two extremely particular sides have shaped: one for gun control and one against it. As of late, the pro weapon control side has contended that the numerous school shootings were halfway an aftereffect of our nation 's negligible firearm control. To numerous this might appear like a sensible contention, however in actuality it is an over-speculation; there are numerous different variables that have impact in horrendous occasions like school shootings. Those against firearm control have contended that weapon control laws are an infringement of subject 's protected rights

Gun control is an ever-growing debate among American citizens. The debate is considering the positive and negative aspects of guns and what limits should be placed on them. Some people believe that guns should be completely restricted, while others believe that there should be no limitations on these weapons. However, many people are caught in the middle of this debate, believing that gun control should be allowed in moderation. Gun Control should be regulated to have a more strict process to obtain guns and to keep these weapons from those who are mentally ill.

Gun control is a topic that is heavily debated in our country and has been for a while. Since the ratification of our Constitution, the 2nd amendment has been interpreted very fluidly from many different groups and people. Ranging from the National Rifle Association who believes that our 2nd amendment right should not be restricted at all, to our current president Barack Obama, who believes the process of obtaining a gun needs to be stricter.

Due to the increasing number of senseless public shootings involving multiple victims, the controversy between supporters and non-supporter of stricter gun control laws are at an all-time high. The key reason why there has not been a sway in either direction is that there are too many unanswered questions in the argument for or against gun control. Since gun control is such a broad topic, if the argument was narrow down than those in favor of stricter gun control laws would have a chance of persuading the majority. By hindering or prohibiting the purchasing or owning of handguns by civilians, multiple, pointless deaths are avoided. Furthermore, arguments such as people are to blame and guns are the most controllable would fall apart and even the Second Amendment could not back the rebuttal.

citizen. Removing firearms from American households will prevent accidental shootings, suicide attempts and unnecessary attacks. Taking away guns will take away the ability to use a gun and people will resort to other options. Not having this gun available will prevent accidental shootings. The Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence states that “In 2010, unintentional firearm injuries caused the deaths of 606 people.” Also from 2005 to 2010 roughly 3,800 people lost their lives due to accidental misfires. 1,300 of that 3,800 were under the age of 25. Children in today’s society own video games that show extreme gun violence. Boys may find interest in guns and when they see that a parent in their household owns a gun they may way to look at it because children are curious. Children may not know the dangers of a gun. Instead of removing guns from people, they must educate their children of how serious guns are and all guns must to be kept in a safe with a lock so that the children cannot get ahold of it. Regardless, removing guns from American citizens will be nearly impossible and will only reduce their

People have been using guns for many years as a means of protection. One of the benefits of gun ownership is so that individuals can protect their personal property. Another advantage of owning a gun is for self-defense. Despite these benefits, numerous states have been trying to create and enforce stricter laws on weapons. If this were to happen, there is a possibility that the stricter gun laws may result in less protection for one self. Although many tragic events have resulted from gun use, many families and individuals have used guns to protect themselves furthermore because its a part of their constitutional rights. Many

The second amendment in the American Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the right to bear arms. A right that has been very beneficial to citizens since it was amended. It allows the population to protect themselves against governmental tyranny and genocide. The push for stronger gun control laws in America projects more of a problem for citizens than a solution.

The Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own guns ; that guns are needed for self-defense from threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders; and that gun ownership deters crime rather that causes more crime. The issue with gun control laws is that people want to add more laws related to gun control because of the recent events happening in schools and public buildings. While many people are for gun control laws, based on information, we should not enact more gun laws because they need to be utilized for self defense and are required for hunting and sports.

Gun control is a controversial problem because of how easy it is for someone to obtain a gun and use it for the wrong purposes, such as murder or suicide. The “right to bear arms” has been flipped and turned around as a way for the people to obtain refiles that should only be licensed to professionals in a field of combat. While it can be argued that citizens have their rights, there should be restrictions for those who will misuse that right so that events such as shootings and massacres can be prevented properly. Gun control is a federal issue that should be addressed logically.

In recent years, gun control has been one of the most debated topics in the United States. No matter who you ask, everyone always has an opinion on firearm ownership. After every publicized mass shooting, two groups of people form: group #1 wants to ban guns from private ownership in some shape or form, and group #2 fights against them fiercely to protect the constitutional right to bear arms. More specifically, the 2nd amendment to the U.S Constitution states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (US Const. amend. II).

Gun control is an issue that has been debated by Americans since the 1960’s (Dolan 1). The debate questions the right of Americans to bear arms, this including, handguns, shotguns, and rifles. Some say a simple restriction of these arms is in order while some think they should be banned altogether (Dolan 1). Both sides hold strong opinions often causing conflict in the matter and confusion among the citizens of the United States.

“I argue that location-specific gun bans (commonly known as “gun-free zones”) are typically unjust” (Pg.1, Hsiao)

While having civilians armed with guns can be beneficial, at the same time it can be problematic. The truth is that not everyone is trained on how to operate a weapon. There are times when people get caught in a situation that may or may not be that severe. In other words, use of force may not be required. Not having complete training on how to handle a weapon or knowing how to react to the situation (using the gun), the individual may end up using unnecessary force to deal with the situation. Even though many claim that guns are useful for self-defense, others may disagree. Studies show that 29.6 million crimes that happened between 2007 and 2011, only about 240,000 of those were the ones where people protected themselves with the use of guns. On the other hand, out of 84.5 million property crimes, only about 103,000 individuals were able to protect or manage to deal with the situation with firearm. Allowing  civilians to be armed may not stop criminals or resolve crime rate, instead it will backfire and they might tend to make the situation more dangerous that it was. Studies indicate that out of 62 mass shootings from the time period of 1982-2012, none of those were

Gun regulation has been a serious controversial topic over years. Politicians from opposite parties always have extensive debates about it during election time. Advocates for gun right believe the ability to own a gun gives people protection. Advocates for gun restriction believe guns are weapons and would do more harm than good. In the past years, the deathly incidents involving guns have significantly increased. Shooting in Orlando and the shooting in Dallas are one of the most memorable events that has happened over the past six months. Often it is done not only by mundane individuals who nobody would imagine are capable of undertaking such dangerous act, but also due to easy availability of guns. As of the laws right now, gun can be purchased with a simple background check and are easily accessible. Without careful regulations and restrictions upon giving out gun licenses and for gun purchasing, people can be suffering from social consequences.