Reasons For Pro Capital Punishment

Debate over capital punishment is nothing new, but it reaches a whole new level when the accused is mentally ill. The question then becomes… was the perpetrator aware of his heinous actions by knowing right from wrong at the time of the crime or was the mental illness controlling his actions? While being sympathetic to the grief and heart break of the victim’s loved ones, I believe that execution for the mentally ill should not be allowed, because often their illness makes them incapable of knowing right and wrong of their actions. Many of those with mental illnesses often go undiagnosed and untreated, either by choice or by financial circumstances, because of the stigma and general lack of understanding associated with this type of diagnosis in our society.

In the debate over capital punishment, the opponents argue that capital punishment should not be practiced because it has a civilizing effect and practicing capital punishment has do deterrent effect. On the other side of the debate, the supporters argue that capital punishment should not be abolished because it is just retribution and has a deterrent effect. In this paper, I will argue that capital punishment should not be practiced.

Relativism is in which a moral or ethical proposition does not reflect on universal or objective truth, but instead makes a claim in relation to circumstance. Death is not right in any aspect that it is put in but we the people should not be in the position to determine someone’s fate even if that person chose to determine someone else’s. Why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong? It is murder only spelled different. One of the Anti-Death Penalty organization support

The death penalty is quickly becoming one of the more controversial topics in the United States. Currently, there are 31 states where capital punishment is legal. As of April 2016, there have been 1,431 executions in the United States, but the number of executions in recent years has been steadily decreasing (Timmons 2017). The death penalty can be put up for moral debate, and one can ask oneself whether the death penalty is ever morally permissible. There are some pros and cons to having capital punishment. For example, deterrence and prevention are good reasons to have the death penalty, but, in reality, the cons far outweigh the possible benefits that may come from capital punishment. The cost of imposing capital punishment is

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, eighteen states have abolished the death penalty since its implementation (Facts About the Death Penalty). But what are the reasons behind doing so? Historically, public policy concerning capital punishment has shifted dramatically, from required capital punishment to jury nullification to a rise in the abolition of the practice. Public opinion has shifted alongside policy, with more and more Americans disapproving of the death penalty and the morality behind it, citing it as an inhumane and hypocritical approach to justice and punishment. I am with the the more progressive Americans that do not believe in administering the death penalty under any circumstances. Rather, I support life imprisonment or the insanity defense for capital offenses whenever appropriate. Capital punishment is ineffective because it lowers the state down to the level of the defendant, frequently discriminates against racial minorities and those of lower socioeconomic status, and it has been abolished in nearly every other modern democratic country.

Capital punishment dates back to 18th century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon. Under this code twenty five crimes, excluding murder, were punishable by death. In historical data, the first death penalty was imposed to offender who was blamed for magic in 16th century BC Egypt (Regio, 1997). Unfortunately, death penalty is still practiced in some countries. For example, in Egypt recently on 24 March 2014, Minya Criminal Court imposed death penalty to 529 followers of Egyptian ex-president Mohamed Morsi for their participation in violence (Amnesty International, 2014). Nowadays, United States also practices capital punishment. According to the fact sheet of DPIC (2014) 20 criminals from different states were executed this year

Imagine you are watching the evening news. How would you feel when you find out that they have found the remains of 10 bodies at the farm two doors down the road? It seems that the neighbors have been killing people for quite some time. Would you have ever known they were murderers? Ten lives have been taken from this world and never to return, what would you want from the government if you found out one of those remains was someone very dear to you that you have been looking for years? Should they receive the death penalty? The punishment for murderers and rapists should be as heinous as the crime they committed. The death penalty is the most humane and deserving punishment that should be dealt.

Yes, the death penalty should be abolished for the worst crimes. Life without parole is better, for many reasons. I’m against the death penalty not because of sympathy for criminals, but because it doesn’t reduce crime, it spreads the suffering of families of murder victims that costs a whole lot more than life in prison, and, worst of all, risks of killings innocent people. The death penalty is very selectively enforced. The death penalty has no beneficial effects, and no one can determine when it’s your time to die.

The capital punishment in North America is the government’s exercise to put a person to death for a crime, and was first recorded happening in 1608. Capital punishment continued to be the fix for crime until 1967 to 1977, when it was suspended. Capital punishment was advanced in 1977 and is still active today in 30 states. The United States government sees the capital punishment as ethical because it is seen as the culminate way to protect the citizens of our nation.

There are political leaders that support capital punishment. Names such as, Hilary Clinton, Joe Biden and Stephen Joseph Harper. The common belief is that capital punishment reduces crime as well as brings justice to the criminals and the innocent. It acts as a way of eliminating the problem by killing the person that committed the crime and ensures the safety of the society. Stephen Joseph Harper stated that capital punishment is appropriate and a double-murderer should not be repatriated back into society. Joe Biden believes that capital punishment is necessary but it has to be implemented in a way that is consistent with our values as Americans. Hilary Clinton supports it but has stated that it’s a complex issue that needs to be limited.

The Death Penalty, the United States is known to be home of the most inhuman crimes over the past years. Examples are things like Boston Bombers, kidnappers, rapist, deranged shootings, and murders. The death penalty has come more under attack in recent years.

In regards to the argument in support of capital punishment, the means do not come from thinking about the death penalty in theoretical ways, but is justified as a form of retribution for individual cases. Certainty, instances of individual stories are important, however, dangers do exist as a result of such stories dictating the overall thinking about an issue that has profound social consequences. Abolitionists argue that capital punishment has never been proved to be effective in deterring others from committing murder, thus, the evil that follows capital punishment far overshadows any possible beneficial factors the opposing argument may state. Quite the reverse, murder demonstrates a lack of respect for the human life. Any life is valuable

Every day the news is filled with stories about people being killed in cities such as Chicago, Illinois even Orlando, Florida!! Detectives now have to ask questions about the victims like whether it was the car they were driving, the colors they was wearing, the shoes/clothes they had on, or their choice of partner that caused them to be shot. Some of the motives behind these senseless shootings vary from robbery, drug deals gone wrong to hate crimes which resulted in countless numbers of innocent individuals being killed daily. Some of the perpetrators are identified, apprehended, tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. Sentence to death may be

The death penalty costs americans less money to use, instead of otherwise using life in prison. One point that supports this, is the overall cost of supporting a man in prison. The amount is stated in an article when it says,“Assuming a cost increase of a conservative 2% per annum the costs come in at over $3 million for 50 years detention, rising to $5.5 million if a 4% cost increase”(Anderson). A man in prison will end up costing around $3 million for 50 years. However the next point shows how expensive the death penalty is. The biggest part of the death penalties costs are the appeals, however even with the appeals the death penalty is cheaper, an articles talks about appeals when it states,”Records obtained by the Bay Area News Group in California show that the appeal costs for the last two men executed in the state were $1.76 million”(“Death penalty information center”).

“Off with their heads!” was the answer to most problems of the Queen of Hearts, a famous character from “Alice in Wonderland.”1 Capital punishment has always been a controversial topic with proponents of both sides presenting numerous arguments to support their positions. A large portion of these arguments are of a moral or ethical nature. Defenders of the death penalty claim that it is the only just sentence for those who have taken a life, that such people do not deserve to live, and that it invokes fear in potential killers, to list but a few. Opponents of this form of punishment believe that vengeance and retribution are morally wrong, that even murderers have the unalienable right to live, that the act itself is cruel and barbaric, and so forth. The major problem with these arguments is that they are highly subjective.