Reasons For The Voting Of The Eu Essay

In order to answer this question, we can look back to 1975, when the UK held a referendum on whether the UK should remain in the European Economic Community (EEC), an organization to bring about economic integration to Europe. According to Henderson, Jeffery, Liñeira, Scully, Wincott, and Wyn Jones (2016), 67.2% of the voters regardless of age voted for Yes in 1975, revealing “the strongest support for

The outcome of the Brexit referendum in June last year came as a surprise to a lot of people, though surveys showed that the outcome would be close. It was predicted that ‘Remain' would win with a tight majority, yet, politicians underestimated the resentment British citizens had cultivated against the perceived domination of the European Union. Citizens voted to win back sovereignty, but as the recent negotiations show the United Kingdom has won anything but that. This essay analyses how the EU dominates Britain in the divorce negotiations by employing John Scott's theory of structures of domination. Access to the single market is the main incentive the EU offers Britain for accepting their conditions of the Brexit. This characterises the EU as the

The European Union was established as an economic and political partnership between 28 European Countries (European Union, 2015). The UK has been stayed in the EU for over four decades from 1973 to now. In 1975, Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson had ever held a referendum on Britain’s membership in the EU and the voting result is to stay in the European Community. Recently, the article (BBC NEWS, 2015) reported that the UK has a plan to hold the second referendum by the end of 2017 to decide whether or not the UK should stay in or leave the European Union. This might be a significant referendum that may bring lots of impacts on the UK’s economy.

The recent UK referendum sent shockwaves throughout the West and the wider world; few people had predicted that the British people would vote to leave the EU. So what led Brits to say a firm 'no thank you' to continued membership of the European Union? A look at surveys, statistics and anecdotal evidence may help us to solve this puzzle.

During the buildup to the 2016 Brexit referendum those who campaigned to leave the European Union did so in order to take back control of their nation, including taking back control of parliamentary sovereignty. Parliamentary sovereignty is one of the fundamental values of the United Kingdom’s constitutional law but European Union law, since the 1972 European Communities Act, trumps that sovereignty. This transpired due to the United Kingdom becoming a member of the European Union where EU law takes primacy over national law. With being a member of the European Union it entailed that the key law making body would be that of the European Commission rather than Westminster Parliament. Many European Union regulations can bypass Parliament and

Apparently massive political decisions with far reaching socioeconomic repercussions should be made based on results from an indirect vote. Brexit was exactly that kind of decision, a whirlwind of policy and controversy. This summer past Englishmen and Englishwomen upsettingly voted to leave the EU. Both Kenneth Rogoff and Uri Friedman put in their two cents in the form of political articles regarding the outcome of the Brexit vote. Rogoff uses an aggressive narrative, making his opinion quite clear and concise whilst Friedman takes a more general approach, looking at more than one dimension of the Brexit vote. Friedman’s use of interdisciplinary sources and general opinions provide evidence for well supported arguments. The Rogoff article is without a doubt more succinct in writing, but with a set of underlying bias guiding the way, Friedman’s broader approach to writing makes his article an unbiased analysis of the Brexit vote. Rogoff’s aggressive writing style makes his argument very convincing, at the same time the Friedman

Over the next few years the issue of the UK’s membership of the EU is likely to be at the centre of political debates. The main parties recognised that a referendum on membership was necessary but it is incredibly difficult to overstate the significance of a vote that would determine whether the UK remains part of the union, the wealthiest economic entity in the world (Portes, 2013).

The party support UK leave the EU can be seen as Eurosceptics. The reason for this view can be analysed in different four aspects, politics, trade, immigration, and history. In the political dimension, UK and the EU countries have obvious difference on the issue of sovereignty (Biskup, 2003). Britain emphasis on the sovereignty of parliament is inalienable. But the EU countries claim that sovereignty not only focus on country completely, but also on the multiple levels, such as region, nation, or Europe.

As it's political . . . The EU, as well as National Socialism and Communism remain the three major ideological scourges of the 20th century. The UK survived the horrors of the concentration camps and Gulags of the European 20th century, intentionally staying away from the isms arising from Europe and the EU remains no different. The decision whether to remain or leave went a lot deeper than economics or social justice and reflects the drive towards a Eurocommunism, disguised as equality and foisted onto populations by elite politicians using treaties. Moreover, the BREXIT regional and social demographics reflected already indoctrinated Millennials, who mainly voted for socialist dependency, typical of a mass-produced ‘selfie’ generation.

This is credited to the impactful changes brought by EU Law. Bearing this in mind, I shall argue that the phrase ‘fundamentally altered’ to describe the dire effect of EU membership on UK constitutional law, is an overstatement, and that the ‘erosion’ of parliamentary sovereignty is capable of being rectified.

What then has been the impact of the European Communities Act 1972 on the doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty? When the UK became a member of the European Community in January 1, 1973 by virtue of the Treaty of Accession 1972, treaties and community law capable of having direct effect in the UK were given such effects by s2(1) of the European Communities Act 1972, which incorporated all existing and effective Community law into UK law. The problem arises in respect of statutes passed after January 1, 1973. According to the traditional doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty, the later Act should prevail as representing the latest expression of Parliament’s will but the Community doctrine of primacy of EU law and s2(4) would require Community law to prevail. In this respect, it is clear from judgements of the ECJ (Costa v ENEL (1964)) that Community law should prevail over national law. In Felixstowe Dock and Railway Co v British Transport Docks Board (1976), Lord Denning dismissed a challenge to UK law on the basis that once a Bill is passed by Parliament and becomes statute, all discussion about the treaty should be disposed, saying that ‘these courts will have to abide by the statute without regard to the Treaty at all’. Further support for Lord Denning’s view comes from the Factortame litigation

"Across the U.K., polls showed that only about 19% of people between the ages of 18 and 24 supported a British exit—the Brexit—from the E.U. Among pensioners, who came of age before the E.U. was created, a staggering 59% wanted their country to leave. And when all of

Who wanted Brexit? Who voted for Brexit? The main support for Brexit came from a coalition party who was less educated, less financially successful and backed by older conservative voters who saw immigrants as a burden and felt left behind by modern life. These left-behind voters who supported Brexit they did not think of economy of their country. However there is not enough evidence that the leave vote was mainly determined by the desire of taking back the nations control from EU or by the voters who blames EU for their financial and social

Britain withdrawing the European Union has always been an ongoing discussion, one of the many goals pursued by some British political parties, along with groups of people and individuals. Leaving the European Union is a right that every country that is part of the Treaty on the European Union has (Article 50 of the treaty), and this is what the Conservative political parties that proposed the referendum are triggering to impulse a faster withdraw from the EU; specially the new prime minister Theresa May. There had been another referendum in 1975, but it resulted in

People have created unions many times but not all of them were successful, specifically when we consider alliances among number of countries with different economics, political systems and culture. For instance, last century brought both the biggest collapse and the most promising union in the modern history. Although U.S.S.R has disappeared from geographical maps, some of its members joined another alliance. The European Union (EU) is an economic and political partnership that united 28 countries on the European part of Eurasia and represents a unique form of cooperation among members today.