Reasons For The Year / 08 Deepened Financial Crisis Of The European Union ( Eu ) And Critically Assess

In this essay, I will briefly explain what happened during the financial crisis of 2007-09, and also discuss the contribution of the government to the financial crisis.

The main reason for the crisis was a boom and bust in the housing markets at the same time. Home values rose rapidly during the beginning of the 2000’s. Many homeowners used their homes and other assets to withdraw equity to produce add-ons to the house, such as kitchens, decks, or patios. Once the value of the houses went down, they could not pay off this extra debt. Homes were beginning to be valued at less than what the homeowners owed on them. This period was powered by leverage, securitization, and structured finance. Housing was a hot commodity at that time, and Americans were taking out hefty loans in order to pay for them. There was a rise in self-employment at that time, and borrowing money was very relevant at that time. Adjustable rate mortgages, which provided initial interest rates and low monthly payments were the most common form of loans between 2004 and 2008. The banks were not careful in their securitization of loans, and a lot of loans defaulted. The defaults mainly revolved around the failing of the housing market. At the time, there was low requirements for down payments on houses. Lenders were only asking for approximately 3%, today it is up around 10% (Golub). This allowed for more and more people to put a down payment on a house, who would not be capable of paying the banks back. During this time, there was a dramatic increase in sub-prime lending, which means that the people borrowing the money had lowering credit

One of the primary factors that can be attributed as to have led the recent financial crisis is the financial deregulation allowing financial institutions a lot of freedom in the way they operated. The manifestation of this was seen in the form of:

The reality of systemic risk made the task of regulating the financial system increasingly complicated, as the crises aren’t contained in one country or market. The extreme inter-dependence between the different agents is the main reason why we need regulation today, as some misconducts can cause a domino effect, affecting markets globally. The structure of the banking system in itself explains this process. In the finance industry, banks borrow money from other banks. If one bank fails, the one who lent the funds in the first place might also follow the same path, creating panic in the markets. The government’s first prerogative is to protect its citizens from these

The purpose of the subprime banks was to sell mortgage loans to people who couldn’t afford them. The banks dupe the people using Screaming ads showing highly misleading mortgage products. The Mortgage brokers were paid big fees to lure people. Countrywide Financial is considered as the epicenter

One cannot say that U.S banking system is designed to fail; however, it is the relentless deregulation in the financial sector and competing for financial sector activities in the globalized financial market as means towards higher growth resulted in its instability over the centuries. The U.S. central bank and federal government did not see the impending crisis on the horizon due to the deregulation of financial market. The central bank believed that there could be evolving economic imbalances or risk in the financial markets, but that these were best managed by market forces themselves. But they failed to realize that some time market fails on its own. Deregulation of the financial sector was initiated and reinforced through legislative changes, followed by regulatory policies consistent with the philosophy of deregulation. As the US was losing comparative advantage in agriculture, manufacturing, and services to developing and emerging market economies, while they continued to have advantage in the financial sector. Hence, the United States perhaps felt that national interest lies in their dominating financial sector activity, and hence development of the financial sector was coterminous with their national interest. This approach could have led to a race to the bottom in financial sector regulation in their jurisdiction. The US banking system and financial sector was source of so much instability was due to relentless deregulation of the financial market.

New financial regulations have been created and existing regulations have been revised in the aftermath of the financial crisis. The role of financial regulatory policy in the financial crisis is sometimes presented in a way that will help the economy improve. Deregulation was an approach that the economy was implementing towards to. According to Kroszner and Strahan in the reading about What Drives Deregulation?, in order to achieve a positive theory of regulatory change, it is crucial for an economy to characterize the regulatory process as one in which “well-organized groups use the power of the state to capture rents at the expense of more dispersed groups.” (Kroszner, Strahan Pp 1438) This suggested that the elimination of restrictions on bank branching will benefit the theories of regulatory change.

One of the principal functions of financial oversight authorities in achieving a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system is to regulate and supervise various financial entities. But following the crisis of 2007, regulatory authorities in the whole world were engaged in a fundamental reconsideration of how they approach financial regulation and supervision. Performing these functions through micro- prudential regulation and supervision of banks, holding companies, their affiliates and other entities, including nonbank financial companies, proved to be insufficient to ensure and maintain financial stability of a country, union or the world as a whole.

Over the past several decades the world has seen what the culprits are with financial instability. From the Great Depression, to the housing bubble crisis of 2008, the economy suffers from many fundamental problems that damper our financial situation. In The Bankers’ New Clothes, Anat Admati and Martin Hellwig explain the struggles of banking regulation in order to gain a better understanding of financial intermediation and how it affects us. Admati and Hellwig provide a forceful and accessible analysis of the recent financial crisis and also offer proposals on how to prevent any future financial failures. The way they achieve this is by engaging us, in plain language, by cutting through the confusion and acknowledging the issues of banking.

The financial crisis in 2008 that led to a crisis in the banking sector, and which nearly led to a complete collapse of the economy globally, was not only caused by changes in the regulatory, regulation and legislation oversight, but also fiscal and monetary policies. Many believe that, expansion of excesses monetary and irresponsibility of some of the government agencies led to the crisis.

The financial crisis that began in 2007 right through to the summer of 2008 was perceived as global crisis that affected various countries including the United Kingdom. It was predominately caused by failure to regulate financial institutions and systems appropriately. (Davies, 2008) The world was shocked and surprised particularly politicians and policymakers. Initially their response was to conduct a crisis management as a solution but later discovered that the crisis was one of the worst in history. As a result reforms on financial regulations had to take place not only nationally but within Europe and on an international level. Gordon (2010) argues that financial crises are nothing new, however they have become more complex over the years and therefore politicians and policy makers face major challenges in implementing the right form of regulation to comply with the complexity of the financial sector. In the UK, at one point in history command and control (CAC) was perceived as the suitable approach to regulate the financial industry; however self-regulation was later introduced as the effective form of regulation based on the neoliberalism concept. After the financial crisis self-regulation was being criticised therefore leaving policy makers, politicians and economists to decide what form of regulation would be appropriate to effectively regulate financial institutions that would avoid and prevent further financial failures. Therefore the purpose of this essay is

You always hear people say that greed is the root of all evil, and in the case of the Financial Crisis that is extremely true. Prior to the crisis the housing market was booming and the value of homes were increasing significantly. People were taking out loans and paying mortgages far more often during this time because they were unable to afford the cost of homes due to the large value increase. Financial institutions

The financial crisis in 2008 was been considered as the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. One of the major reasons of the crisis was that banks in the States were given permission by the repeal of the Glass-Steagall legislation, which allowed banks to affiliate with insurance, real estate, security. The goal was to create financial firms “better equipped to compete in global financial markets”. With the firewall between commercial banks, which make loans and take deposits, and investment banks, which underwrite securities removed, an opportunity rise for banks to create and push more money and eventually to speculate on financial markets. The financial crisis reminded us that the banking industry has a serious influence

The Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 was considered to be the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression in the decade preceding World War II. The Global Financial Crisis threatened large range of the financial organizations. Although the central banks and other banks were trying to keep away from the crisis, the stock market still suffered a huge decline internationally. Other than the global stock market, the house market was also influenced greatly, causing the unemployment, relocation and even the foreclosures. There was absolutely no doubt that the 2007/8 financial crisis brought failure and hard time to the business all over the world, especially the capitalist counties in North America and Europe. Many factors had been discussed to be directly and indirectly caused the Great Recession in 2007 to 2008. After some deep analyses done by the economists and experts, the developed country household debt with the Real estate bubble caused by the low tax lending standards, was the most public belief that people considered as the major cause of the financial crisis. But, who and what was going to be responsible for The Financial Crisis of 2007-2008?

The financial crisis of 2007-2008 had more sounding effects on financial institutions even greater than the crisis brought about by the stocks downfall in the 1990’s. The reason for this is that the financial institutions were at the centre of the whole crisis. And financial institutions being one of the key pillars in a country’s economy, the crisis was bound to have a big effect in US as a whole. So, in order to understand what rely happened, it is wise to go through the paper written by Nicholas Barberis about the whole crisis (Barberis, 2011).