Reasons Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Being a division one soccer player, I do receive a small athletic scholarship that helps with paying for school. Big time sports like men’s football and basketball receive full scholarships that can cover tuition, books, food, and housing for athletes. College is essentially paid for while athletes participate in their sport which means a free education and no need to take out student loans. There are also many academic support services for athletes to ensure grades stay up for eligibility.

What amount of money should college athletes be paid? This has been a controversial question for many years.Some lower level Division One NCAA athletes think that their scholarships do not pay them enough as it is, and instead they want cash rather than the scholarship. These situations have been taken to court and arbitrated in NCAA hearings. The NCAA, or the National College Athletics Association, has declined for the athletes to be paid a salary every time when they surmise that they should. There are so many reasons why the NCAA has declined for these athletes to be paid and have proven to be naive. The NCAA should not be conciliatory on

The proposal of payment toNCAA student-athletes has begun major conversations and arguments nationwide with people expressing their take on it. “This tension has been going on for years. It has gotten greater now because the magnitude of dollars has gotten really large” (NCAA). I am a student athlete at Nicholls State University and at first thought, I thought it would be a good idea to be able to be paid as a student-athlete.After much research however; I have come to many conclusions why the payment of athletes should not take place at the collegiate level.The payment of athletes is only for athletes at the professional level. They are experts at what they do whether it is Major League Baseball, Pro Basketball, Professional Football,

Every year in the United States, thousands of collegiate student-athletes participate in a variety of different sports, and currently they do not receive paychecks for their performances. College athletics have attained an extensive popularity increase among Americans over the past few decades. This has resulted into increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA] and the participating colleges, which has fuelled the debate of whether or not college athletes should collect an income. College athletes should not be paid to play because it will negatively affect their college experience. Rather, they should be compensated for their dedication to the sport. Many student athletes accept scholarships to play at a

Free education is a huge factor as to why they should not be paid. Research shows that “College athletes don't have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on living and meal plans.” (Source B) Which can add up to a substantial amount. I would say they get free education, in return they represent the school in sports.

College athletes should be paid because of the long hours that they put in. According to Mike Gupta,“These athletes also spend at least forty to fifty hours on school to keep their scholarship to play a sport” (Gupta 5). That is a lot more work than just a normal student. These college athletes work way harder and they put a lot more time into school and the sport they play. “These college athletes have to put in around ninety hours a week on schoolwork and their sport they play just to keep the scholarship on” (Gupta 6). They hardly can focus on school because they are all worrying about the sport they play, trying to get better at it. They are practicing and playing in games risking themselves to injuries, and if they do, it could possibly cost

Even going up to division one schools there are still very few that make a profit. According to George Dohrmann a lot of athletic programs don't create enough money to generate the profit needed to pay athletes. Major programs like Oregon's earned $44,538,251 in 2009-10 thanks to the chairman of Nike who has apparently donated 300 million over the years and would be able to pay athletes, meanwhile other schools like Mississippi and San Jose State would fail because they didn't break even. Not all schools have backers like Oregon, but other schools out there who do have them like Ohio State like Michigan like UCLA could write checks out to athletes using the huge checks they get from Nike. But as Dennis Johnson refutes, the athletes at college should always be students first and foremost while having athletics come later, but any money that universities make goes right back into the non-profiting sports. Actually, the NCAA funds more than 80 national championships a year across three divisions, demonstrating the spread of the organization across the states. Even though champions usually come from a small pool for all college sports paying athletes would draw all the athletes to the higher paying school eliminating chances of upsets almost for good (Johnson). In other words the money for their scholarships is coming from the NCAA so no matter what sport they play all of their

That is more than The National Basketball Association and The national Hockey League. With all of that money made a large portion doesn’t go back to the classroom. The NCAA states that paying college athletes would ruin the competitiveness of the the sport which doesn’t make any sense, because the NFL pays its players based on their rankings and performance. Suggesting that payment destroys the competition then the NFL is incredibly misinformed. If the NCAA paid its athletes the students would not have to add extra stress worrying about where they will get their money from. If students did not have to worry about their finances, they could spend more time focusing on their game and class. This helps prevent tired and burnt out athletes from underperforming when it’s

The athletes are given a scholarship that can be worth up to $65,000, that pays for almost all costs they will encounter in their life. (Here's Why We Shouldn't Pay College Athletes, (2016).) One way of paying college athletes would be to completely get rid of their scholarship and for them to receive a salary to cover their college costs and anything else they want to buy. This salary would be taxed by the state and federal taxes. (Here's Why We Shouldn't Pay College Athletes, (2016).)

Although college athletes receive a far superior scholarship to attend a college than do non-athlete students, the athletes should still receive extra income from the billions of dollars the NCAA generates per year.

The NCAA and CBS has signed a $10.8 billion television agreement over 14 years and that’s just that specific contract which doesn’t even scratch the surface of all of the other money the NCAA is making off of advertisements and many other things such as that. Arguments for paying college athletes may be somewhat strong but it still needs to be taken into consideration that these athletes are getting plenty from their scholarships and the amazing opportunity of going pro and being able to sign huge contracts with teams in the sport they chose to

Finally, the most important reason college athletes should not be paid because they receive a free education for playing for the university or college. “College athletes receive numerous amenities and luxuries free of charge” (Post Column 1). The athletes are students sustaining entry to a college education through their involvement in sports, which means they earn scholarships that pay for their bills; living space, committee, and other authorized payments. “Paying college athletes would diminish all the goals and morals that colleges and universities stand for” (Post Column 1). College sports is not an occupation or vocation.

First, scholarships are not being benefited from due to the lack of time the athlete has. A reimbursement for students not using the scholarship to its full potential is pay. Second, student-athletes often end up with low paying jobs, so a pay rate in college can help them out after finishing school. Paying college athletes would help their future if they do end up with a bad job. Third, college sports have profited millions of dollars off of these student-athletes and they only receive a scholarship.

With sports being such a big part in a student getting admitted to college their education is often put as a secondary priority. Many student athletes lose focus on the purpose of attending college due to the dedication required for playing sports at a collegiate level. Responses by student athletes vary when asked: Should student athletes be paid for their participation in college sports? College athletes very rarely analyze everything they are given, including opportunities to meet people, luxuries such as clothes and shoes, and lastly a free education. College athletes are offered scholarships and are given the chance to attend school debt free, while playing the sport they love. Student athletes

Some believe that college athletes should not be paid for their performances because athletes with scholarships receive money for tuition, books and housing. Although this may be true, most college athletes do not receive scholarships. One article notes that students with a grade point average (GPA) of