Reasons Why Quebec Should Secede

Their main focus is on representing Quebec's political interests in Canada, with little interest in the rest of the country. In the eyes of the separatists, Quebec is too different to remain a part of Canada. While it is possible that Quebec would not do any better by themselves, there is no evidence pointing to Quebec doing worse on their own, it is possible they would do better (Jacobs 27). Quebec is referred to by some as a nation within a nation, and in many ways it is. From the beginning Quebec has been set apart from the rest of Canada, and if Quebec were to separate, it would not be as devastating as some claim it would be. There would still be existing trade between Canada and Quebec, and Quebec would gain many economic advantages it currently does not have (106). Quebec separating would also mean taking their share of the debt with them, about ¼ of the debt, leaving Canada with significantly less (global-economics). Another benefit to Quebec separating would be the government no longer having to be careful with what to say or do about Quebec. Without Quebec, Canada would be a more cohesive, governable political entity

In Canadian history, nationalism and sovereignty tend to be common themes prevalent since Confederation. A well-known example of this in Quebec was during the Quiet Revolution which strengthened the need for change through Premier Lesage’s reforms and in turn, developed a strong sense of nationalism in Quebec. In contrast to beliefs that the rapid modernization of the Quiet Revolution had a positive impact on Quebec, it rather had a negative impact on Quebec and its citizens and identity. The three consequences which arose in Quebec as a result of the revolution are the encouragement of separatism, the elimination of traditional values and roles and the establishment of powerful bureaucratic control. Quebec’s attempt to be more like the

When the French settled into Canada 400 years ago independently of the British, the first stages of French/Francophone identity was formed. Over time this unique identity began to emerge and become something different from the rest of Canada. Language, history, and the geography of their land continues to evolve and separate the Francophones from Canada as their land and way of life is special to our nation. The dual nature of the French/English faultline in Canada manifested early on in history when New France was threatened by British occupation, ultimately leading to Confederation; we can continue to see this in modern times through referendums which deal with French culture and separation. Quebec is also unique geographically, containing mild to arctic climate zones and 4 geophysical regions; this is very diverse for a single province in Canada. These regions in Quebec allows for a diverse economic industry, including: hydroelectric production, agriculture, forest and mining industries. The economic production through Quebec’s varying geography and their individual French culture and history is what makes Quebec a unique region in Canada.

“Two heads are better than one”. This phrase means that some tasks can be accomplished successfully by two people working together rather than an individual working on their own. The same concept applies for a country. With many issues and challenges that a country may face, having more regions contributing to the country will lead to success in solving these problems and challenges. Therefore, Canada is more successful with more regions working together in comparison to the regions breaking up.

Being an English speaker myself it is very encouraging and helpful that I am perfectly bilingual, being bilingual has helped me in the work force, in my studies and in my social life. These are some factors that have English speaking Quebecers speak more French and really made an impact among English and French speakers of Quebec. In Bernard Landry’s video he talks about speaking to his cousins that live in British Columbia and displays how they have lost their French Background it is in the Parti Quebecoise best interest to prevent this from happening. As we have seen, la survivance was the notion that fuelled traditional Quebec nationalism. The Quiet Revolution gave rise to a new type of nationalism in Quebec which had a different vision of the state and its ability, through its institutions, to help the French survive (L7, S49). The French-English divide was further aggravated when the Quebec government decided to use its institutions to implement legislation to ensure the survival of the French language in Quebec. This caused a great deal of controversy in English .In an attempt to counter such nationalist language tactics and appease the French, the federal government also used its institutions to enact legislation related to language. There is no doubt that the

Now that we have studied the history surrounding the issue of Quebec's unique place within Canada, we will explore the pros and cons of recognizing Quebec as a

English and French Canadians have had years of disagreements and the Quebec Referendum of 1995 proves how separate both really are. The Quebec Referendum of 1995 was the second referendum to ask voters in the province of Quebec whether or not Quebec should declare national sovereignty and become an independent country. The Quebec Referendum of 1995 was a defining moment in Canadian History that emphasized the disunity between Quebec and the rest of Canada. With the alienation of Québec, the Parti Quebecois advocating for national sovereignty, and Lucien Bouchard taking over the leadership of the "Yes" side from Parizeau causing the “Yes” side to get momentum, are all examples of how this historic event emphasized the disunity between Quebec and the rest of Canada.

The outcomes of Canadian autonomy have not been to great with damaging changes to the French-English relationship. However, it wasn’t that bad and a lot of good came from it as well. Canada’s transition from a self governing British colony into a completely independent country, was an evolutionary process. When Canada was under Britain parliament, it stated that Canada would have no choice and had to join the war if Britain did. The Canadian government began

More so, many Quebeckers were finding greater economic opportunities in the United States, which fostered concerns about the economic isolation of Quebec, which could ultimately become part of the United States and lose any form of Francophone independence: “Quebec’s economic weakness could be seen already in the flood of emigration toward the United States” (Silver 46). In this case, the underlying debate about provincial rights in the new federal government had to be addressed to ensure that Ontario did not usurp the provinces under a primarily Anglophone government. These clashing interest define how the threat of British colonialism and the economic and military aggression of the United States posed a major threat to Cartier and the Bleu Parti (Smith 43). These political negotiations defined the major efforts to unify the nation under MacDonald and Cartier’s federal plan as the two major provinces of Canada. This political culture created an opportunity to provide greater legislative and principal authority to countermand the new central government created through the Canadian

During the 1960s, Quebec nationalism changed to focus on reform and independence. These changes effected French-English relations in many ways. First, Quebec’s new independent attitude caused tension between French and English Canadians because of many reforms brought in by the Lesage government. Secondly, Quebec’s new attitude also tried to improve French-English relations with the creation of the Bi and Bi Commission. Also, Quebec’s government started to make decisions on their own which didn’t sit very well with the Canadian government. “The government embarked on a series of reforms that altered substantially conditions in Quebec: … creation of the Quebec Pension Plan (1965) … The second source of tension has already been pointed out: the Lesage government brought in many

In the 1980s of Quebec there was many conflicts at the time many which change Quebec to be more independent and others that harm people to simply convey a message about the treatment of Quebecois. Quebec population were too influenced by natonlism to see what was wrong in the situation and how that would impact the world. The government at that time didn’t think about how to achieve their desired goal because they were more focused on the goal itself. Quebec isn’t stable for the province to convert into a province because the economy was pretty low. Quebec is not going to remain peaceful and it is especially present in the 1980s because there was a disagreement on how Quebec will be in the future.

The federal government provides transfer payments to the province of Quebec for it to be able to afford the necessary services it needs to provide to its citizens. If Quebec were to separate because they feel that their unique nationalism is not recognized, they would not have enough money for education, hospitals, and government services and would have to heavily tax the citizens in order to pay for the services the way they are today. Right now they enjoy cheap education with the lowest University tuition (YIP, 2015), but it would significantly increase without the transfer payments from the federal

Quebec has played a special role in the French History. In the modern province occupies, many of the land where French settlers that founded the colony of Canada also known as New France that was in the 17th and 18th centuries. The population is predominantly with French-speakers and Roman Catholics, with a large group minority that was Anglophone. The political alienation of Francophones from the Anglophones has been a persistent theme since the late 19th century. The tension was high during the First World War. Historically, the British merchants and the financiers controlled the whole economy and dominated Montreal. During the Quiet Revolution in 1960, much of that changed. Quebec's separatists, calling for an independent nation, gained

There are many ways to look at situations, places, or people in this world. Keeping this in mind, one ought to realise that different strokes may well be for different folks. One of the many resourceful and effective manners of doing so would be to look at what constitutes a subject as this allows for one to understand how it functions as well as how it is put together from within the inside out. In Canada’s case, this may be applied when asking the widespread question: “Should Quebec be recognized as a ‘distinct society’ in the constitution similar to the agreement known as the Meech Lake Accord in 1987?” The French province of Canada should be led to separation as this would undoubtedly have major implications on the fates of all factions

First off all, as a mention previously most advocates authors believes that Québec separation would cause an economic crisis. Most results show that referendum varies within the firms an inability to control and improved them they will need help from foreigners ours if they refuse to accept foreigner Quebec can only survive as a nation by using their own natural resources for goods and services such as gas, oil, hydro Quebec and etc. If Quebec wants to survive without Canada Quebec would need to provide its own unemployment insurance, social security, family allowance, and agriculture subsidies and pay federal pensions to Quebecers. Thus, a separation will cause a higher unemployment rate, there’s going to have a high tax rate, higher