Reasons Why Teens Should Get Paid For Good Grades

If students are rewarded for quality schoolwork, grades may initially improve. They may show more excitement. However, in the article “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades” by Amy Mccready, it is found that the enhanced grades deteriorate along with the excitement for the payment. Most children simply lose interest in the reward. It is better to just let youth accomplish

    Why do almost all students dread school? Though the answer may differ between different people, the main reason why most students dread school is because we have to go to school almost everyday and work, receiving no reward. There is nothing to look forward to in school and though the idea may sound absurd, students should get paid for good grades. School is work, it’s difficult and it takes up our entire day, filling the rest of our free time with homework or topics to study. If we got paid for doing good in school, then we would be encouraged to keep up the hard work and we would put more effort in school. Meaning that the next generation of adults would be well educated and would benefit society in many ways. Getting paid for good grades would also help us see the responsibility that comes with money. It would also help prepare us for life after school because we would know how to spend our money wisely, so in other words, students should get paid for good grades because school is work, we would be more encouraged to be diligent and we would learn the responsibility that comes with money.

If kids do get paid they will like to learn more, they think going to school is a waste of time but when they do get paid they won´t think that anymore. kids don’t like school is because they think they don’t get anything out of it so if we do pay them they will work harder. In my opinion i

The general argument made by the author Arianna Prothero in her work ‘Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work’ is that paying students for grades only works for students who are already doing well within their classes. Throughout the article, the author was appearing to be neutral about the topic. Prothero uses the statement “the effects are small if even there at all” to emphasize the point about the incentive only working for students who are almost there. These pupils are the students who only need to put in a small amount of work and effort to achieve this reward.

Giving your children money for satisfying grades that they get doesn't benefit them with their career that they will have as adults. Let me back this up. If they get paid for the super grades that they received they will soon have an expectation that everything good that they do they should receive something in return. This makes kids not try to the best of their ability because these children know

It is a bitter,cold February evening, my wife and I are eating at the local McDonalds. The smell of the hamburgers and french fries surround us. Why are we eating here instead of eating at a real restaurant? I’m broke, and it’s all because I’m paying for kids that aren’t mine to get a good education. I believe I shouldn’t be forced to pay for school funding because I don’t even have a child!! I feel it is unfair because, it doesn't’ benefit me, the money isn’t going to good schools , and schools may be using this money for things that will not continue to help other students as well.

Would students be able to improve their grades if they were getting paid? Money is a great reward for most students and it could possibly have a long term effect on students. They are always wanting their grades to be improved and then they would have more of a reason to study for test and quizzes if they were getting paid do go to school. Students would be focused at school if their was money to be made by going to school. Teachers would also not be stopping as often because of students getting of track. I believe students would improve their grades if they were getting paid because, Money could have a long term effect, and more student could need a little more motivation

In the article, “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades,” Amy McCready details her argument against children receiving money as a reward for good grades. Her main point is expressed in her article as a sentence: “But no matter how much we want it to, money can’t buy smarts, motivation, or school success.” She is expressing her idea that paying kids will not genuinely help them. Within the article, McCready expresses her dislike of parents using payment to attempt to encourage student achievement. Her points include her belief that paying children won’t maintain high grades because kids lose interest and excitement over time. She also believes that payment for grades creates a negative attitude within the children and invoke a sense of entitlement.

One time, I got a good grade and my grandma gave me money. If school is truly wants student to be motivated to do well in the school should pay student for a better grade. Motivate student prepares them for high school higher test score. From better graduation rates for learning about work making kids smarter there are many positive effects of paying student for a higher grade.

“Why can’t our hard work have an income?”. Almost all students have had a similar thought at a time in their lives. To them, the incessant striving and vassalage they do for school deserves a salary. However, the situation with the exchange of grades for payment is a problematic state of affairs. In the predicament of schools giving students this opportunity, it will certainly lead to catastrophic events for all parties involved, especially, in the long run. Insightful to the statistics and evidence of both standpoints, school payment for grades is a situation best abstained because it causes quagmires. In agreement with this, say it causes conflicts, it’s only short-term, and causes negative impacts in the long run. By not paying students, you avoid turmoil, cut out a short-term motivator, and allow their future selves a better chance academically.

More than half of the students in any school show they learn more and understand more when doing an activity that involves moving around. Students getting paid is like and activity, they will learn more because they are working for something every month. A school in Massachusetts has started paying kids to work and learn and when they have testing, studies show their scores go up. Being paid isn't a big reward but when you're in high school you might need a car, or your parents might tell you to pay for your own things like clothes, so you will need a little money. It has its advantages and disadvantages but paying students will help kids have a better education and have a better experience at school and have a brighter future.

To begin with, students should not be paid for exceptional grades, as a result it robs their feeling of accomplishment. According to “Parents paying their children money for excellent grades is a horrible idea”, by Gisler and Eberts, “ Many parents don’t realize that giving money to children for grades robs their feeling of accomplishment.” This means, giving children money they only do their work if they’re getting paid, and they don’t learn as much. The effect of this is that they don’t get that feeling of them doing their work all by themselves with nothing supporting

It was shown that promising kids that they will get paid in exchange for higher grades or attendance led to increased less effort in school. The ability to learn was actually a failure, it had little direct impact on the kids. I intend to use this article as a outline for should students get paid for good grades.

Kids should get paid for good grades because they will start reading more, in a school in Dallas, TX. They start to pay two dollars for each book kids read, they actually became better readers, they started to understand things better, the test scores begin to get highly raised up. The other people that are in the opposite side may say that, this is bad for young people and they will became interested and will just want to do the things just if there's money involved and they will, not do it if they don't get payed for what they do, and if they don't get payed or if they get late payed they will go down, but they are all wrong because probably, with all the things that they learn will keep going up. Don't you guys want your kids to subside in school?

To begin, once teachers start paying students for good grades, the student’s grades went up, but did they actually learned? Some students might have only did it just for the money which won’t help them in the future. Some students might be doing the work for both the money and the learning which is good, but some students wouldn’t really be doing it for the learning so it could be hard for them to remember those things. On Pareecothifter.com said that,”It isn’t the point to get your kids to work satisfactory.” This shows that when your paying kids for good grades their isn’t a point to it unless their work was done to learn not just for money. Once they do the work and don’t remember anything that in their future they wouldn’t know what helped them learned the things