Recent Top Five Causes of Death in Ameri and South Africa

Biopsychology: The application of principles of biology toward the study of psychology. Also known as biological psychology, behavioral neuroscience, or psychobiology

Also sociologists believe that the focus on a particular patient for whom a cure should be found for is limited. As little concerned is paid to environmental and social factors that may lead to ill-health. The biomedical approach tends to focus more on the individual while ignoring the environmental factors that may cause disease.

The biomedical model relies on several assumptions including the concept of mind body dualism with the mind and body seen as separate entities and accepting that they can be treated separately. The body itself was viewed as machine with a broken part that could be repaired or healed by an expert. There is a belief that a disease has its origin in a specific and knowable cause. The sick body can be examined, treated and repaired without taking other factors into consideration. The doctor holds a detached view of the patient and treats the body in isolation without considering other reasons that contribute to the condition.

A bio-psychosocial describes an approach systematically considers biological, psychological, and social factors and their complex interactions in understanding health, illness, and health care delivery. Biological factors include defective biological processes compounds that lead to biological dysfunction and illness. Psychological factors are about the individual’s emotions, behavior, and mental processes. Social factors include social status and relations. These factors are all considered in an attempt to understand the underlying factors of such disease.

The biomedical model and the biopsychosocial model are both representations of health commonly accepted in modern society. The biomedical model considers the absence of disease is physical wellness. This model is good practice but it has limitations. On the other hand, the biopsychosocial model takes into account the whole person which has led to extensive research in many aspects of wellness. It addresses more than physical well being as many people now are ill but they have no presence of disease. Socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity and generational differences all play important roles in

Psychology is the study about life, according to the video called Magic of Mind. The video explained several types of psychology such as: psychodynamic, humanistic, behaviorist, sociocultural, cognitive or biological. The most interesting school of psychology to me is the humanism. Humanism according to the book called Psychology says, “Humanism is a perspective within psychology that emphasizes the potential for good that is innate to all humans” (page 19). This shows that no matter how bad we are there is still good in us. For example, I encountered a costumer at my work that was not in a good mood. She gave me an attitude and negative comments along the way. When she was at the counter, I was the one who received her payment. When the transaction

Physical Body is centered primarily on the physical facet of health such as drugs and surgery. The mind of consciousness is likened with functioning. Bio-psycho-social is centered more on consciousness. Physical Body focuses predominantly on the human as a Physical Body and what can be done to fix it physically. Bio-psycho-social states that the mind is unlimited and boundless. In Bio-psycho-social the understanding came about that a person’s mental health can affect their physical health as well as the health of other people around them (Dossey).

A biopsychosocial model is a deep interrelation of all of this three-factor such as biological factors(genetic and physical history), psychological factors (cognition, will, and emotions), and social factors (socioeconomic status, culture, religion, and technology). When a combination of all of this three-factor working together, it will lead to an outcome of an illness, however, each of this factors on its own is very insufficient to lead to an

Biomedical model of health is an approach which eliminates psychological and social factors (environment) but only comprises biological issues in trying to recognize or understand an individual`s medical illness/disorder. The biomedical model of health looks upon treatment in expression of changing the body by medical intervention forms. Also this model seeks to look at what is wrong and fix that part of individual as it focuses on illness rather than health as well as diagnosing an individual`s illness.

The Biopsychosocial (BPS) model greatly differs because while the biomedical answers the main question “why do people get sick?” the BPS also answers the question “why else do people get sick?” [9] According to the BPS model, the human being is complex and must be understood as a whole. That there is a relationship between body, mind and environment and that one aspect affects the others. Health and illness are caused by multiple factors and have multiple effects, from the biological or cellular level

Scientifically and clinically, biomedical model has been proved to be of great assistance. Biomedical model of health determines the illnesses through shown symptoms (Wade and Halligan, 2004). Diseases and symptoms are the signs that there is something wrong within human body in terms of functions and structures. However, this model has its drawbacks. According to Engel (1977), the medicine major flaw was that it defined ‘disease’ using somatic parameters.

I have chosen to compare the postmodern perspective on health and the biomedical model. The biomedical model view of the body is mechanistic. This point was argued by Engels, who said that the body was a machine and the breakdown of this machine was disease. he also beleived that the the doctor was the only one who could fix the machine. this point leads to many biomedical views. Firstly, it shows the way that doctors view the body as a set of individual parts, diagnose and treat them as such. This non-holistic view of the body is often criticised because it fails to cnsider the person as a whole and entire building. Secondly it shows the importance of the doctor in the

Medicalisation is conceptualised as an approach encompassing the medical definition and subsequent treatment of non-medical conditions and portrayal of the aforementioned condition as a medical problem, akin to an illness or disorder (Conrad, 1992: 209). The term ‘medicalisation’ first appeared in medical literature in the 1970s, however was more often than not used only in the context in the critique of medicalisation, lacking in the modern conventional sense of

The naturalistic explanation assumes that illness is only due to impersonal, mechanistic causes in nature. This can be understood and cured by the application of the scientific method of discovery.

The treatment of physical and mental problems has undergone a rapid change in the past few decades. An increasing number of bodily and behavioural symptoms now have a recognised medical diagnosis and corresponding treatment. Sociologists have attributed these changes to the process of medicalization, wherein “non-medical problems come to be defined and treated as if they were medical issues” (McLennan, McManus & Spoonley 2009: 271). Medicalization is an ongoing, gradual process which occurs through the social construction of new diseases by groups such as health professionals (Conrad 2007: 4). It can be argued that medicalization is an active and passive process by which diseases are constructed in an attempt to find treatments for patients; and that diseases can be ‘socially’ constructed as well as ‘corporately’ constructed by companies to create a profitable market of consumers. At the micro level of society, medicalization in the Western world has been influenced by liberal notions of individualization which has extended to some parts of the health sector. At the macro level, medicalization has been buoyed by the process of the professionalization, expansion of state monopoly over the health profession and religious and political social movements. Although some academics argue that the medicalization of society is less significant than the process of “de-medicalization”, there is clear evidence that the process of medicalization is intensifying and outstripping the rate