Reclassification Research Paper

Net neutrality is the principle that supports free speech on the internet and allows us our right to freely communicate online (Singel, 2017). Net neutrality restricts major internet service providers, such as AT&T and CenturyLink, from discriminating upon certain online data because of content. Without net neutrality, these internet service providers would have the power to block or decrease the speed of specific internet content (Reardon, 2015). The providers would also be capable of charging money from internet users who want to access particular websites or data within websites. Websites that receive a large amount of users on a daily basis, such as Twitter and YouTube, would be given faster data speeds than less visited websites. This would lead to large companies monopolizing internet content, which would impact the way we browse online in a negative way. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) sets restrictions and regulations for broadcast, telephone and cable communications in the United States of America. The FCC is attempting to put an end to net neutrality. The vote to do so will take place on December 14, 2017. Ajit Pai, the current chairman of the FCC, is a former employee of Verizon Wireless. Verizon is one of the major internet service providers which would greatly benefit from net neutrality being abolished. Many questions have been raised concerning Pai’s past connections with Verizon, and a numerous amount of individuals believe that this is why Pai is pushing an end to net neutrality. Companies like eBay and Amazon will be required to pay more money to the major internet service providers in order to receive faster data speeds and better user efficiency. This would eventually lead to consumers having to pay more money for their performed endeavors online. The internet service providers would also have the potential to bundle websites into packages. Consumers would then have to purchase these packages in order to access specific websites. This is extremely similar to how DirecTV, Dish Network and other cable providers offer packages for television channels. Tom Wheeler is the former commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission. Wheeler expressed his thoughts on

The Internet, a global computer network providing a variety of informational and communication facilities, is how we connect with long distance friends and family, how we receive an education, and how we earn our livelihoods. The Internet is a crucial part of our lives in this day and age, so we should be concerned with what happens to it and net neutrality. Merriam Webster defines net neutrality as the “principle, or requirement that Internet service providers should or must treat all Internet data as the same regardless of its kind, source, or destination.” Net neutrality ensures a fair playing field for entrepreneurship on the internet, using the internet, and censorship.

Net Neutrality stands to define the future of internet. I will discuss the pros and cons, the different perspectives on the subject, the effects on providers (such as Netflix) and consumers, and some of the future implications of this contentious issue. Net Neutrality is one of the defining struggles of what role technology and information will play in our future. What regulations should there be on internet freedom, censorship and the free market? There are many rivaling interests between various companies, consumers and the government. The military’s reliance upon internet resources means we will have to adapt to this emergent problem as it

When one thinks about recent developments in technology. one must note the significance of the internet, as it has allowed for types of communication among humans that was simply impossible to achieve before. While the internet is still very much in its infancy, in a relatively short amount of time it has become a fixture of American life, reaching into dozens of different places. When a person wants to go on a trip they go online. Truly, the consequences would be astounding. In fact, an entire generation would have to learn how to accomplish a countless number of once paper-based tasks. This is why the preservation of net neutrality is ultimately important. It allows the internet to persist in an equally accessible

Many Americans are hung up on fighting for Gay Rights or arguing about what side we should stand on the Israel conflict or even what they should watch on Netflix tonight. However, what they don’t realize they should be worrying about is Net Neutrality. Net Neutrality is, “the concept that broadband Internet service providers should provide nondiscriminatory access to internet content, platforms, etc., and should not manipulate the transfer of data regardless of its source or destination” (dictionary.com). Originally gaining a lot of attention back in 2004-2005 when Dialup internet was being replaced by broadband internet, most people have again recently heard about it, but never take the time to figure out

Every American citizen is granted with certain rights that are protected by the very documents that helped establish this country. Those documents mention freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press. Although these freedoms are recognized as being dearly important, the government appears to be wanting to limit them in a very devious way by wanting to “improve” the internet through ending something known as internet neutrality. Internet neutrality prevents the government and corporations from allowing restrictions on the internet, so internet neutrality is necessary to maintain internet freedom, prevent an all-controlling government, and prevent the regulation of the internet from affecting the free market system. To many, internet neutrality may sound like something bad at first glance, but net neutrality is actually something positive once it is further looked into.

In 2015, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) tried to take net neutrality away but many internet freedom groups, 3.7 million commenters and many startups won the right to keep net neutrality. Now on December 2017 the FCC is planning to vote again to take net neutrality away and if they do it’ll completely change how we use the internet. Your ISP’s will have the power to block certain websites and slow them down. For companies that pay extra their websites will be “faster” or will be in the “fast lane” as they say and other companies that don’t pay extra will be in the “slow lane”. Or even force you to

In America (and most parts of the world), we expect our the internet to be free and easily accessible to anyone with device that has internet connectivity (cell phone, laptop, desktop computer, etc.), and some form of connecting to said internet (whether that be wireless, or through an ethernet cable). We also expect to be able to access anything we want on the internet, streaming on Netflix, for instance. This freedom we more than often take for granted is known as net neutrality. And on December 14th, 2017, all these freedoms, and the entire free internet as a whole, will be changed dramatically. And several million people all over the world fear these changes may take a turn for the worse very soon.

Imagine if your favorite website was slowed down or blocked by your Internet service provider. Imagine if you had to pay more money just to access your favorite websites. Right now, we do not have to worry about these scenarios because of net neutrality; however, the death of net neutrality is coming soon to the United States. Hello, I am Steven Lai, and today, I will convince you all not to support the United States Federal Communications Commission, also known as the FCC, and their efforts to repeal the current net neutrality rules. I became well-informed about this net neutrality situation because I have been following the FCC’s efforts to eliminate net neutrality since its start in January of this year. First, I will talk about net neutrality in the United States. Next, I will talk about how we can help save net neutrality in the United States. After that, I will talk about life without net neutrality. Finally, I will talk about what we can do to help keep net neutrality in the United States.

Net neutrality has become a huge topic in today’s society full of internet users, however nobody really knows whether it should pass or not. America is a capitalist country and supports free-market expansion and competition, however net neutrality is the exact opposite. Net neutrality has communistic views in which every website gets equal treatment and equal internet speed. As ABC states “Net neutrality is the principle that ISPs treat all content equally and not give preference to some digital content providers. That means the consumer can load every website, app, video, .gif, etc., equally, regardless of where the content is hosted.” (para. 3) Net neutrality is intended to regulate the internet and treat it like a common carrier such as television or telephone. Up until 2015 the internet was classified as an information service, meaning that the FCC could not control it and had no bearing over what happens on it, but after, then-president Barack Obama passed a bill stating that the internet would be treated as a common carrier, which is a person or company that transports goods or people at a fixed rate. This caused the FCC to control over the internet, regulating speeds, dictating what ISPs (Internet Service Providers) are able to do, and transforms private internet cables into public. Until 2015 the internet was built on a primarily free-market framework and was constantly upgrading. More and more websites were forming, going to ISPs to increase their speeds, causing

The 21st century has ushered in a digital age of widespread internet usage, one in which millions of United States citizens rely on the web for information and connection. Knowledge that would have taken our ancestors months of ocean voyages to barely scratch the surface of is now accessible through a few clicks and keystrokes on any multimedia device. With that said, managing and regulating the convoluted system of wires, satellite transmissions, and network infrastructures that constitutes broadband technology is quite a complex and fascinating procedure. This paper will focus on and analyze an aspect of this regulatory procedure entitled net neutrality, which has been a heated topic of debate among policy makers and internet users over the past decade. It will begin by highlighting all the players interwoven in this multifaceted phenomenon, and then argue for why net neutrality regulations are unnecessary in today’s media environment. Overall, net neutrality regulations are unnecessary because they congest internet traffic, are inefficient for the consumers, and ultimately benefit giant media corporations and the government, which work closely together through lobbying.

Beginning with its inception in the early 1990s, the Internet has been a source of content and information accessible to all. Net neutrality, or the idea that all data should be treated the same online, has been in place for more than twenty years now. However, this may be all about to change in the United States. On December 14, 2017, Congress is going to vote on whether or not they should repeal the current laws protecting net neutrality and the "open internet". The FCC, or Federal Communications Commision, proposed laws (known as Title II) that kept net neutrality in place and strictly regulated internet service providers (or ISPs). However, the current Chairman of the FCC, Ajit Pai, a former lawyer for the ISP Verizon, has proposed that these laws be repealed. Net neutrality is integral to the Internet as we know it, and repealing it may be an irreversible decision that will limit our access to data and news at the whims of the ISPs.

In modern society the internet has become an important utility that everyone accesses daily. Whether it be checking news articles or using it to view social media, it has become integrated into society. Even businesses rely on a clear and functioning internet to perform essential business related activities. In recent times, the question of a neutral internet has been challenged repeatedly in prospects of deregulating governmental actions protecting the internet despite public disapproval. While there are advocates for both sides of the argument the current regulation proves to be beneficial for businesses as well as average consumers. As such, the principle of net neutrality should remain intact due to its social and economic advantages as well as the insufficient argument for its repeal.

Even though the term Net Neutrality has only been around since 2008, the principals and debate behind the term

Net Neutrality has been argued over for more than a decade, even since the internet became public. It is one of the most controversial topics of the 21st century, and everyone has a different opinion. The united states of America 's executive branch believes that the internet should have no “gatekeepers”, someone or business that doesn’t allow some material through to viewers. Others like the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) believe that the government has good intentions but is going at it wrong. For the past 6 years, President Barack Obama has given more fire to the debate of whether or not the internet should have more regulations, so the controversy has gained much support in the world. The government wants a free internet by putting regulations on The question is, is it constitutional to do this and if it is, what does the government really want for the people of the United States? Is the internet a part of our everyday rights in this free country? Many countries around the world already have internet regulation, so should the United States of America be more regulated, too? How much power does the FCC and the federal government have over the internet. Should you ask yourself do you want regulation and have “bit equality” or do you feel that it’s our right.