Recombinant Dna Persuasive Essay

We are keeping our food reliable through the use of GMOs. GMOs can provide food that can be helpful for conditions in the world. They can be manufactured to fit to threatening conditions, such as drought. They can also be used to withstand diseases that have the potential to cause famine. Blights can cost millions in damages, and with new resistance technology being tested we could save millions of dolars and millions of crops. "Blight-resistant potatoes would be one of the first major foods genetically engineered to incorporate defenses against plant diseases, which annually destroy some 15 percent of the world’s agricultural harvest." These foods can even be modified to prevent bugs from consuming or ruining a crop yield. This resistance to famine can help us become less concerned about starvation due to unfavorable conditions. The crop yield can remain the same. Those opposed to GMOs may claim that they increase pestacides and harm the environment. This is completely false. "It is a matter of fact that GM crops have drastically cut the use of such pesticides. GM cotton, containing a built in insecticide, uses 50% less chemical insecticides. In 1998 around 1000 tonnes less insecticide was used in the US cotton belt than before the introduction of GM cotton. That insecticide was mainly sprayed from planes. Only a small percentage reached its target. The rest drifted into the wider environment killing

“As biological novelties to the ecosystems, GM crops may potentially affect the fitness of other species, population dynamics, ecological roles, and interactions, promoting local extinctions, population explosions, and changes in community structure and function inside and outside agro-ecosystems” (Gertsberg, 2011).

Not only are GMOs harmful to humans they affect many other communities. “GMOs are also responsible for killing off bees, bats, butterflies, and other pollinators, whose bodies are unable to handle the onslaught of altered DNA and chemicals that are characteristic of GMO technologies”(Bensen). This shows that GMO is not only an issue for humans but it directly affects the insect and animals communities around the plants. These are living organisms that these plants need for pollination. GMOs and the pesticides used on these crops to fight off the insects and weeds is creating more powerful weeds and insects called “SuperWeeds” and “SuperBugs.” “And this built-in resistance has allowed farmers to indiscriminately spray chemicals like Roundup on their crops without worrying about killing them. But this system is now failing, as the weeds and pests targeted by GMO technologies have mutated and developed resistance to crop chemicals and Bt toxin” (Benson). These chemicals are effective for a short period of time However these chemicals become ineffective, the offspring of the insects can be immune to the chemical. This creates a need for a new and stronger chemical mix. GMO seeds and destroy the soil and kill beneficial

Although genetically modified foods do produce favorable effects on biodiversity, it can also harm it a great deal. The use of the genetically modified crops with herbicide properties, pose threats not only to the target pest but also to non pest insects and key pollinators. For instance, major pollinators and other harmless species are being poisoned by neonicotinoids, a chemical found in genetically modified seeds. However, according to Paul and Cummins, not only are bee populations declining, but also birds, butterflies and fish. The decline in these species raises quite the alarm due to the fact that without them, we may not be able to grow food. Bees are essential in growing crops due to the fact that crops need to be pollinated in order to germinate. For this reason, the high number of crops containing the neonicotinoids are causing the crucial pollinators to spontaneously perish.

Genetically modified organisms, otherwise known as GMOs, are a great danger to humanity. GMOs are genetically altered organisms engineered with the purpose to be resistant to dangerous pesticides, or to repel certain pests or certain viruses. The main purpose of them is to save farmers money when it comes to harvesting crops and cutting down labor costs. Overall, GMOs (also known as biotech or transgenic crops) are not safe and there are many reasons to prove it. First and foremost, GMOs pose a great risk to people’s health. GMOs are not natural. Scientists have developed these to help increase crop yields and profits for farmers and the companies selling the seeds and pesticides. They sacrifice people’s health at the expense of risks such as, humans developing allergies and possible resistance to antibiotics. Second, the environment will suffer greatly from GMOs by increasing the use of harmful herbicides. GMOs have insecticidal properties in their DNA. This on its own can be very harmful and poisonous to the ecosystem. The required herbicides used on GMOs to kill the weeds are also very dangerous to the environment. Lastly, GMOs cause great distress to organic agriculture. The organic agriculture is being compromised and abolished when GMOs come into contact with organic crops. While only a few big companies hoard the seed industry, this can be the demise of the planet’s organic agriculture. That will leave GMO companies in charge of the

When farmers grow genetically modified foods, they are damaging the environment; by labelling these foods, consumers can choose whether to support GMO farmers or go with organic or conventional growers. Ronnie Cummins, founder of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) mentions that “scientists estimate that herbicide-resistant crops planted around the globe will triple the amount of toxic broad-spectrum herbicides used in agriculture” (Genetically Engineered Foods 18). These herbicides are bad for the environment because all non-GMO plants will be killed if these chemicals spread. This would possibly destroy ecosystems and reduce biodiversity between plants and other species. When GM crops are planted, there are less weed flowers; therefore, there is less nectar for pollinators. In addition, toxins released into the soil from GM plants’ roots mean fewer soil bacteria come to exist in an ecosystem (Glass). When GMO

For a long time, scientists have researched about passing genes from parents to their children, and they successes in many parts after experiencing many testes. Now, Scientists know that each allele has a specific responsibility in the body of human. Understanding of the DNA helps to give opportunity to think about controlling genes and attempting to make it better. Although opponents believe that it’s not acceptable for parents to engineer their children like a building, and genetic engineering has connected to the eugenics’ program which is not acceptable for human beings. Genetic engineering should be allowed for parents to design their children for having a perfect ability and healthy body.

Food industrys know GMOs are bad for your health, the problem is If farmers do not spray their produce it would financially collapse the food industry around the world. In 2003, it was estimated that if we didn’t use herbicides and other chemicals to kill the weeds and pests than it would have cost us $21 billion dollars. Of this, $7.7 billion would have been spent on other forms of treatment, and we would have lost $13.8 billion because of less yield or crop being produced.

The article raises a big question about GMO’s, an issue that we have covered in class and in readings. The issues facing the farmers in over twenty-five states is one of great importance. Farmers who do not use GMO crops are finding that their crops are being damaged by the pesticide even if they are miles away. It has damaged about 4 percent of all the soybean crops in the United States. Sadly, it has also affected vineyards, watermelons,

The amount of money channeled through the purchase of pesticides and other chemicals have been the major setback experienced by many farmers across the globe. The introduction of GMOs has proven to produce the answer to this puzzle as farmers now have the ability to farm crops that require minimum attention when disease and pest control concerns arise. This is because of their ability to fight major diseases and are resistant to pests that otherwise would have attacked them.

Most public concern has been focused on human health and safety regarding the use and consumption of these foods, but potential environmental impacts are important to consider as well. Many varieties of genetically engineered crops are intended to decrease the need for chemical pesticides and fertilizers, but the scope of environmental impacts does not stop at chemical usage. Common concerns about GM crops include the effects of cross-pollination, so-called “genetic contamination,” and the escape of GM crops from cultivation and their interactions with native species. Conversely, the environmental benefits of GM crops range from reducing dependence on chemical pesticides to the ability to treat polluted soils with bioremediating plants (Ford, 2004).

For example, some GM soybeans are created to withstand the Round-Up glyphosate herbicide engineered by Monsanto, a powerful biotechnology company well-known in the domain of GMOs, which means that it can be sprayed to kill any weed around the plants in big quantities without any harm done to the crop itself (“GMO Risks” 44). This is a worrisome possibility since the glyphosate has been categorized as “probably carcinogenic to humans” by the World Health Organization in 2015 due to studies which showed that farmers exposed to this chemical have twice the risk to develop blood cancer (Cassidy 4). This becomes an even bigger problem when we consider that in the recent years, according to the Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources at Washington State University, the herbicide use in the U.S., from 1996 to 2011, has increased by 404 million pounds since the introduction of GM plants (“GMO Risks” 46). This is a direct result of the weeds becoming resistant to the chemical, thus leading to a bigger use of the latter. It is well known that such chemicals products are linked to various diseases like cancers or neurological problems, and therefore, GMOs containing these products can rightly be considered as potentially dangerous (Connealy 11).

Imagine you were alive back in the 80’s and were told that computers will soon take over every facet of life from dating, shopping, and the stock market, and that literally billions of people would be connected in a web of an information highway that is access from a hand held devices that have more processing power than the technology we use to fire ICBMs.It would seem absurd, but then all of it happened. Science fiction became our reality and we don't really think about it on a daily basis.Today we’re at a similar point with genetic engineering. Recently scientist has hit a huge innovation in which they have the means to modify genetic material which can change every aspect of an organism, now the question is should we use this power to design the future generation.

Last Sunday, I was shopping with my mom at the Kroger grocery store. Suddenly, I saw a carton of soy milk that was labelled “Non-GMO”. I did not know what the label indicated so I asked, ‘Mom, what does “Non-GMO” mean?’ Mom quickly turned around from the end of the aisle at the dairy section and walked towards me. She grabbed the carton of soy milk from my hand, looked at the label and explained to me with a smile, “It just means that this soy milk is not made from any genetically modified organisms, also known as GMO.” As we walked down the aisle, I noticed that there was more unlabeled milk than “Non-GMO” labeled milk. Therefore, I asked my mom whether all the ones without labels were modified genetically and she replied immediately with a confident “Yes.” I was shocked and confused. Since I want to be a physician and make a difference in people’s lives in the future, I have always been interested in different new technologies that can possibly improve our health and quality of life. Particularly, I am very interested in genetic engineering because I think deliberately modifying an organism’s traits by manipulating its genome is very complicated, yet it is a beneficial technique if it is being used correctively. For example, this technique can be used to replace a gene that can cause the chronic disease with the normal and healthy gene so that the patient will not suffer from the chronic disease. GMO are the results of the new genetic engineering techniques and they are

GMOs adversely impact the environment by requiring an increasing amount of herbicides. The three most genetically engineered crops: corn, cotton, and soybeans, have had herbicide, more specifically known as glyphosate, more commonly known as Roundup, “increased 10-fold from 15 million pounds in 1996 to 159 million pounds in 2012” (Hoffman). The increased use of herbicide is supposed to kill weeds competing with the actual crops, however, the only thing it does is create weeds that are becoming progressively more tolerant to the herbicides. This creates “superweeds”, requiring an increasing amount of Roundup and causing an increase in the toxicity levels in the glyphosate to kill. Additionally, with the increasing strength of given herbicide the range of organisms that it kills expands, which “decreases biodiversity”, causing ”soil quality to deteriorate” (Pesticides). With a lower biodiversity, the soil is