Reconciliation Essay examples

Forgiveness has proven itself to be more significant than just verbal affirmation. It is something that mends social and emotional breaks between two groups or individual, and allows both parties to move past the situation; continuing with their lives. In Forgiveness, A Sampling of Research Results from the genocide techset, “Forgiveness is a process (or the result of a process) that involves a change in emotion and attitude regarding an offender. Most scholars view this an intentional and voluntary process, driven by a deliberate decision to forgive . This process results in decreased motivation to retaliate or maintain estrangement from an offender despite their

To begin with, reconciliation is not a quick and easy process. In fact, it is the exact opposite. In the process of reconciliation one can either superficially reconcile with a plethora of people or one can truly reconcile with a few people. This concept is similar

The idea of justice should be based on the idea of forgiveness. A popular attempt at achieve justice is to “forgive and forget”, however this idea is not the best method. To forgive means to recognize that someone has done something wrong and is attempting to fix it, and in turn, you must accept this attempt in order to move forward. Holding grudges is a part of the Human Condition in the sense that we struggle to get over instances of people wronging us, instead of getting over it, we deeply desire revenge. However this is something that we must move past in order to reach true justice.

Forgiveness is important when ending a feud. When people forgive each other, they realize that it provides more happiness than hatred does. In the short story, “The Interlopers” by Saki, Georg and Ulrich have a change of heart after a three generation feud.

Reconciling with someone is restoring trust when the trust has been broken or damaged. Forgiveness either decisional or emotional is what happens within a person and reconciliation takes place between two people. To reconcile with someone is to present good behavior over (x) amount of time, until a point is reached and trust can be restored. Everett also teaches couples how to forgive their spouse and reestablish trust in their relationships using the Hope-Focused approach which is composed of two sides. The first side is FREE (Forgiveness and Reconciliation through Experiencing Empath) and the second is HOPE (Handling Our Problems Effectively). Research has been conducted on both approaches and has proven to be valid.

In the last 15 years, Everett has thoroughly studied how forgiveness and justice collaborate. His interest in this topic peaked after his mother was murdered which at the time was very devastating for him, as can be to anyone. Over time, Everett forgave the person who murdered his mother. Everett fiercely believes the art of forgiveness was passed to them through their mother. Everett had a brother which committed suicide as a result of the agony he dealt with in his mother’s passing. After the commitment of his brother’s suicide, he felt great self-blame and has since studied self-forgiveness

This case study proves that the restorative justice process is one that indisputably works. The victim said that he would recommend the process to anyone who has been affected by a crime. The procedure allows both parties to see the other’s point of view. It has been recounted to provide closure and allow both parties to move on from that point in their life.

In this experiment, one group was told to recall an offense in their own romantic relationship done by their significant other (first party condition), and another group was told to recall an offense of their close friend’s romantic relationship. Both were told to then rate the degree of severity of the offenses on a five-point scale. he results of the third-party forgiveness effect were found to be as predicted and further confirmed they hypothesis that third parties of a victim are less forgiving to a perpetrator who committed an offense than the actual victims are (first party). Another finding of this experiment was that the offenses were rated much more severely by third parties than that of first parties (Green et al.,

Martin Wright explains that restorative justice involves a fundamental change in the response a society has towards individuals who harm one another. Wright elaborates that this terminology shifts the meaning of crime, stressing the fact that people are harmed, rather than a crime was broken (Wright 216). This highlights the ultimate source of restorative justice, and its strong relationship with

     Reconciliation means to bring back together. In Reconciliation the way we are brought back together with the community is by asking forgiveness. Forgiveness means to pardon or spare. In Greek it means to send forth, put away, and yield up. The other meaning is to give up the desire to punish or to cancel a debt. Jesus gave us the sacrament of Reconciliation. We were granted this sacrament so whenever we turn away from God we have the choice of asking forgiveness so we can be reunited with Him.

One of those concepts was forgiveness. This essay will explore the concept of forgiveness and

Negotiated forgiveness consists of the perpetrator and the victim to confront one another and discuss the motives and understand the perpetrator’s intentions. With the dialogue between the two opposing parties, reconciliation can finally emerge. Kraft states the need for negotiated forgiveness, “In the context of truth commissions, unilateral forgiveness is forgiveness, and negotiated forgiveness is reconciliation. During truth commissions, forgiveness appears as an internal disengagement from the perpetrator, independent of the actions of the perpetrator. In contrast, reconciliation is a dialectical process of acceptance, involving direct interactions between perpetrators and victims,” (Kraft 115). This is why reconciliation is extremely important, to resolve reconciliation is essential in promoting peace. With a strong understanding of the contrast between forgiveness and reconciliation, one can intensely evaluate the process of reconciliation during the events of the TRC.

“Can the past be forgiven? Can people who have been traumatized live with memory and each other again? What do they need to be healed?” (Marrus 27). In a world growing smaller each day, people cannot afford to hold onto the traumas and wrongs that have been committed unto them. At the same time, how can the world ask people who have been tortured, abused, systematically raped, and their lives forever changed to live with their aggressors once again? Can these people forgive their transgressors and come to a place of reconciliation? The steps taken by the Germany after the Second World War give one example of how to acknowledge atrocities. The Holocaust is an example of horrors on a global scale, but despite the scale or length of

Guidelines for reconciliation conversations promote honesty and vulnerability while maintaining a respectful environment. These guidelines should develop a space where open and clear communication will occur. Thus, helping individuals take responsibility for how they act toward each other. Reconciling conversation is speaking truth of a belief. It begins by identifying unique experiences that spearheaded those beliefs. Reconciling conversations means willing to listen without interrupting and leaving any urge to diminish or demean the other individual at the door. They are not about converting or convincing each other. The goal of reconciliation conversations is to discover common humanity in self.

Frequently, our misunderstanding of forgiveness is because we do not understand what it is not. Forgiveness is not forgetting, pardoning, justifying, excusing, condoning, explaining, denying, telling someone you have been hurt, telling the offender you forgive them, approval of what they did, revenge, based on apology or restoration of offender, nor reconciliation. Forgetting is something you hear from people when they talk about forgiveness. For instance, they tell you to forgive and forget; however, as demonstrated in class we should not forget the transgression lest we fall prey to the transgression. If we forget we are destined to repeat the transgression cycle, so we need to set new boundaries within the relationship. We watched a video called The Power of Forgiveness and it was stated, “When you continue to remember an unjust, you pass the anger to your children,” but according to Waldron and Kelly, “both researchers and laypeople acknowledge that (1) forgivers’ responses toward the offender become less negative, and (2) forgiveness involves cognition, affect, and behavior,” which will protect your children from your past. (13, 14) Also, people will tell you if you forgive someone then you are justifying, excusing, condoning, explaining, or denying what they did.