Reconstruction Of The South Summary

The South was in ruins.They faced homeless refugees who needed food, shelter, and work. They also had to reconstructed, because the South was destroyed.

Ronald D. Eller and James Tice Moore have different views of the change in the south after reconstruction. Eller believe that the south changed due to the change of in southern economics. The south was able to take advantage of industries in Appalachian, that produced coal, iron, and lumber. The railroad system allowed the south to interact with the industries in Appalachian, which brought a growth to the south economic system. According to Eller, the change transformed the south into a “new south”.

On the other hand, in Reconstruction: North and South there are many types of oppositions. Due to the absence of Southern members, Congress decided to pass the Republican economic agenda. In order to remove Civil Rights Act doubts, joint committee proposed the 14th Amendment which had went far ahead of the Civil Right Act. Many radicals had wished for the Congress to control the Reconstitution program, but Lincoln wanted the Presidential control.

North or South: Who Killed Reconstruction? Read all about it! The biggest scandal in American history! In April 9, 1865 the end of the civil war, with the North winning.

The United States faced a Civil War from April 12, 1861 to April 9, 1865. The Civil War was caused by disagreements between the North and the South on certain social issues and state rights, because of this, the South decided it was its own country and left the Union. After the Civil War reconstruction had to take place. Reconstruction is a program made by the federal government from 1865-1877 to repair the damage caused by the Civil War and restore southern states back to the Union (Lapsansky-Werner, et al. 958). Problems associated with Reconstruction affected the South’s ability to industrialize after the Civil War in multiple ways. This affected the nation as a whole concerning factors such as economic development, infrastructure, labor and human rights.

When reading about the reconstruction era after the civil war I try to take a step back and look at their perspective and the struggles they went through. The best way to try to understand life at that time would be from the words of Houston Hartsfield Holloway, born enslaved who lived and wrote about his life at the reconstruction era "For we colored people did not know how to be free and the white people did not know how to have a free colored person about them."

As you're eating dinner at the diner, you see white men beating an african american. And you wonder to yourself when will this end? And who will stop it? Some good facts to know is that in the year of 1876, it was the 100th year of the Declaration of Independence(Roden,505). Also that the Civil War lasted 4 years(Dallek, 535). The question asked is, South or North. Who destroyed Reconstruction? I think the South destroyed Reconstruction because of the KKK wanted power, the KKK was harming the african americans, and the South wouldn’t stop the KKK.

Reconstruction in the south began after the Civil War. As a part of the reconstruction, freed slaves were rewarded for their loyalty to the Union by having land distributed to them. This gesture was believed to be the catalyst for allowing the newly freed men to better their lives and provide them with opportunities that they had not previously imagined. They were now considered United States citizens, and therefore, expected to benefit from all of the rights of this new citizenship. The reality, however, would prove to be not nearly as promising as the dream. Land ownership was important to their development as new citizens, as it would provide them with the opportunity to establish their own homes, and benefit from their own labor.

After the Civil War, America was in a time of turmoil. The Civil War was a dramatic experience for the entire country that was thought to bring about significant changes, but it did not. Within one year after the war, slavery had been recreated under a new name through the creation of black codes. Although changes were being made, these changes were not valid because the Southern states were resisting change in their values and beliefs. There was lots of controversy during this period of reconstruction between the Republicans of the North and the Democrats of the South surrounding the political rights and opportunities of the newly freed slaves. The recent war had hardened both sides opinions, polarizing

Morrill Land Grant Act of 1862 - gave each state 30,000 acres of federal land per member of congress of the state

After the Civil War, the nation was shattered. And the people had looked to Lincoln to repair what had been damaged in the United States. But a Southern extremist with a homicidal plot had ensured that reparations between the North and the South would be stalled.

The United States went through many changes after the Civil War and during the Reconstruction period of 1866-1877. Before Abraham Lincoln was assassinated on December, 1863, by John Wilkes, Lincoln announced the first Reconstruction plan a year before the Civil War had ended and Lincoln offered general amnesty to white southerners who would pledge an oath of loyalty to the government and accept the abolition of slavery. During the summer of 1865, Johnson not long after he took office had revealed his plan for Reconstruction or as he preferred to call it “Restoration,” which reflected both his staunch Unionism and his firm belief in states’ rights. He offered some form of amnesty to Southerners who would take the oath of allegiance.

Reconstruction was a time period from 1865-1877 immediately following the Civil War in hopes of rebuilding the United States, where several different groups in the government tried to solve the economic, political, and social problems that was a result of the Civil War. Whites didn’t want change they felt they didn’t need any sort of help or correction and blacks only wanted their freedom and to be able to own their own land. Although Reconstruction did a whole lot of good for the nation and the southerners, it didn’t entirely result in a success in the

The Reconstruction Era can be distinguished from other eras by looking at the relationships between the northern and the southern regions, along with the rights of African Americans. Having won the Civil War, the northern part of the country (anti-slavery) pushed for more rights and freedoms for those freed from slavery.

1. The war in 1862 was only more than a year old and the people in both the Union and Confederate sides didn’t anticipate it would last that long, but it is going to go on. Close to the end of the summer in this same year, the Union has made huge progress in claiming confederate lands, winning some major battles. They have put the confederacy in the defensive. They have taken over New Orleans, with even black troops major on the ground of New Orleans. They have taken Missouri and are working hard to take over the Mississippi Valley and maybe even Richmond itself. Bruce Catton puts it this way in The Civil War, “Except for guerrilla activity, Kentucky and Missouri has been swept clear of armed confederates, Western Tennessee had been reclaimed, there was a Yankee army in Cumberland Gap, another one was approaching chattanooga, and a third was sprawled out from Memphis to Corinth, preparing to splice down through Mississippi and touch hands with the Union occupation forces in Baton Rouge and New Orleans” (85) So not only that they Union had taken over regions, they are advancing as well, but they did not win the way this year for some reason. Firstly, because they did not have generals and army heads capable of taking them to victory. General Halleck, chief of the Union Armies and Pope in charge of one of the Union armies in Virginia, were major examples of this.