Recrystallization And Identification Of Unknown

An Erlenmeyer flask was used to accommodate the largest volume of recrystallization solvent calculated and was cooled in an ice bath to increase the yield of crystals. The solid was collected by vacuum filtration and washed with a small amount of ice water. The product is then dried to a constant mass by use of an oven and weighed. A small amount of the unknown was compared to two samples of acetanilide and phenacetin for a melting point range to determine the identity. The temperature of the unknown was recorded when the first trace of liquid can be seen and when the unknown was completely liquid.

During recrystallization, the solution was to be cooled to room temperature before placing it in an ice bath. Doing this allows enough time for the crystals to be formed because as the temperature decreases, the rate of crystallization slows down. If the solution was placed in the ice bath too quickly, then the cold would have blocked out the impurities and trapped them in the solution. The more impurities present, the lower the melting point so data would have been inaccurate. Also, if the melting point apparatus wasn’t set up correctly, the data would have been imprecise.

The mixture was transferred to an ice bath to crystallize the product, after which the product was collected by vacuum filtration on a Hirsch funnel, washing the flask with small aliquots of cold xylene and pouring the solution over the crystals, allowing the vacuum to thoroughly dry the product. Additional drying was achieved by transferring the product to filter paper and pressing the crystals to remove any excess moisture. The product was then weighed and a melting point determined. A comparative TLC was run in Hexanes:Ethyl Acetate solvent against maleic anhydride to verify the purity of the

Experiment 55 consists of devising a separation and purification scheme for a three component mixture. The overall objective is to isolate in pure form two of the three compounds. This was done using extraction, solubility, crystallization and vacuum filtration. The experiment was carried out two times, both of which were successful.

The recrystallization technique utilizes the ability of a compound to dissolve within a hot solvent and produce a solution. As this solution cools, the solute reforms without impurities in a crystal lattice structure.1 For this to work properly, an appropriate solution that will not dissolve the solute at low temperatures, but will at high temperatures, must be used.1 There is no single solvent that will work well for every solute’s recrystallization; different solvents are better suited for some solutes than others.2 Some impurities that do not dissolve within the solvent can be filtered out while the solution is still hot, while other impurities that readily dissolve within the solvent shouldn’t recrystallize with the pure substance (as they are not concentrated enough to

The product was placed in a Craig tube and several drops of hot (100°C) solvent (50% water, 50% methanol, by volume) was added and heated until all of the crystals dissolved. The Craig tube was plugged and set in an Erlenmeyer flask to cool. Crystallization was induced once the mixture was at room temperature by scratching the inner wall of the tube. It was then placed into an ice bath for ten minutes until crystallization was complete. The tube was then

The product was then suspended in 2 ml of water with a stir rod in a 50 ml Erlenmeyer flask and heated to boiling. Water was added in one milliliter increments until all the product was dissolved (18 ml added total). The saturated solution was allowed to slowly cool, and gradual white crystal formation was observed. Recrystallized product was collected once more by suction filtration with the Hirsch funnel once crystallization ceased. Collected product dried on a watch glass for a week, weighed 0.14 g (1.2 mmol), and the melting point was 139°-141°

With a molecular weight of 180.2 grams/mole, this is equivalent to 0.00499 moles initially. 0.941 grams of the product, stilbene dibromide was collected upon completion of the experiment. With a molecular weight of 340.0 grams/mole, this amounted to 0.00277 moles of product. This gives a percent yield of 55.5%. The melting point of the product was found to be between 250C and

The product obtained had a melting point of approximately 107 °C and a weight of .324 grams. Some of the product would not dissolve in water and so was removed through vacuum filtration, which left .141 g not dissolved in solution. It took 13.2 mL of sodium hydroxide to turn the solution of the product dissolved in water pink. A molecular weight of 138.63 g/mol was calculated from the data. These results indicate that the product was 2-methylbenzoic acid, the Grignard reagent was 2-methylphenylmagnesium bromide, and the unknown bromide solution was 2-methylbromobenzene. Calculations showed that the limiting reagent of the Grignard preparation was magnesium and that the experiment had a 23.13 % yield.

The objective of this lab was to use qualitative and quantitative measurements and observations to properly identify, and then confirm the identity of an unknown compound. After identification, the compound would have to be synthesized, in our case, through an acid-base reaction, followed by confirming its identity with the original unknown compound.

After allowing the flask to cool to room temperature and cooling on ice, the product was collected and washed with 2-propanol (2ml) into a clean Hirsch funnel and was filtered using vacuum filtration. The triphenylphosphine oxide remained in the propanol solution, and the crystals were dried by drawing air through them. The mass, percentage yield and melting point of the product was obtained. The crystals were stored in a glass vial for next experiment.

Aim: To classify unknown substances according to their structure type and to observe how the structure of materials affects their uses.

The week after, a recrystallization was performed on the previous week’s crude product. The product ethereal solution was first heated on a steam bath until dry. During the heating, a beaker of methanol was collected and also placed on the steam bath. Once the product was dry, it was cooled to room temperature and then placed in an ice-water bath. The now boiling methanol was added to the crude crystals and a recrystallization was performed. Once completed, the now purified product was collected via Buchner vacuum filtration and stored in drawer to dry for a week. Afterwards, a melting point range of the purified product was obtained by using a Mel-temp apparatus. Lastly, an

Crystals were collected in a Buchner funnel, washed with alcohol, then ether, then transferred into a sample tube for storage.

Subsequently, 10mL of 3.5% H2O2 were added dropwise to the reaction mixture and was stirred for 20 minutes before heating to boiling at 80°C for 5 minutes. The reaction mixture was then taken off heat and allowed to cool undisturbed in an ice-bath for 30 minutes. Suction filtration was performed after to collect the crystals from the chilled solution The product was then washed with chilled 95% ethanol (2 x 15mL) and followed by diethyl ether (2 x 10mL). The crude product was then left to dry before recording the yield. 20mg of the crude product is then accurately weighed out and dissolved in deionized water in a 25mL volumetric flask. Deionized water was added to the volumetric flask to the mark and the UV-vis absorption spectrum of the crude product was recorded.