Reentry Needs Research Paper

Community corrections is continually changing and has been for the past one hundred years. From the early to mid-twentieth century onward it has used three major models, the medical model, community model, and the crime control model. The major turning point for the American community corrections system that led to corrections as we know it today was in 1974 when What Works? - Questions and Answers About Prison Reform by Martinson was published. The system changed practically overnight across the nation. The notion of rehabilitating offenders was dismissed and a more punitive “lock them up and throw away the key” mentality took over. Presently the corrections system is still working in the crime control model, but professionals are trying to restructure how we deal with criminal offenders during and after incarceration. The difficulty in the restructuring is finding the balance between punishing criminal offenders proportionate to their crime, but also rehabilitating them to be productive members of society once they are released so that they do not recidivate.

Every civilization in history has had rules, and citizens who break them. To this day governments struggle to figure out the best way to deal with their criminals in ways that help both society and those that commit the crimes. Imprisonment has historically been the popular solution. However, there are many instances in which people are sent to prison that would be better served for community service, rehab, or some other form of punishment. Prison affects more than just the prisoner; the families, friends, employers, and communities of the incarcerated also pay a price. Prison as a punishment has its pros and cons; although it may be necessary for some, it can be harmful for those who would be better suited for alternative means

Passing a law for immigration is a difficult thing to do since people in the United States do not agree that congress should give immigrants rights. In the beginning of the film, their are many families who face deportation of their family members. These families are so heartbroken since children have to face either their father or mother getting deported. One child says “Father’s day is coming and my dad is not here so I could not give him a card” (Robertson & Camerini, 2015), many immigrants go through this traumatic event in which families are being seperated. There are services for immigrants and their families that can help them through this distress. According to Helms (2011), NIÑOS is a program to protect

The purpose of the immigrant program is to assist men, women, and families who are having difficulties in regards to cultural

Child welfare social workers and other similar service providers who provide direct assistance to immigrant families; such as the Department of Children and Family Services strive to ensure the wellbeing of all families. The IRIRA has an extensive history of separating families, therefore all social workers alike and community partners have a pronounced interest in keeping children in the custody of their relatives; lowering the risk of trauma resulting from separation and promoting family stability. The objectives in the alternative policy also are a match to social worker values; to ensure access to needed information, services, and resources; equality of opportunity for all people.

Therefore, emphasizes efforts to prevent crime ex ante instance of relying heavily on ex post penalties. Limitation of this policy is that it does not offer programmatic initiatives or structural and decision-making changes for securing community engagement. Rather is evolving strategy, which the dissimilar replicas of community prosecution efforts that make it problematic to define what community prosecution actually looks like. Reason for this it is critics of approach being without “a coherent vision” and is “lacking in structure, even chaotic”. Moreover, the evaluation of this approach make it difficult due to the mixture of policies it represents prospective varies from application to application (Miles, 2014). As a result, introducing

As discussed above, the rapid growth in the number of prisoners results to overcrowding of the prisons, increasing the cost liability of a nation. However, the emergence of intermediate sanctions alternative in the criminal justice system has significantly reduced the number of inmates in the prisons. As affirmed by Neubauer & Fradella (2015), the system of punishing the law breakers outside the jail has maintained a reasonable number of inmates, making the states to allocate minimal budget for the correction and rehabilitation

Family reunification is a vital principle regulating immigration policy. This regulation permits citizens of the country and other legal permanent residents to bring specific loved ones to the country. There are approximately 480,000 family-founded visas accessible annually (Haugen and Musser 58). Immigrants under this category gain entry to the country either as direct relatives of United States citizens or via the family scheme. Even though, there are no restrictions on the number of visas accessible to immediate relatives, the petitioners must comply with various age and monetary requirements.

This journal discusses the negative effects of mass incarceration aimed at serving as a deterrent to reoffending. Harsh Punishments, inhumane methods, and custodial sanctions are viewed as methods to reinforce the message that criminal behaviour has no benefits. The social experience gained by incarceration further equips persons who are living in this poor and at risk communities. They will further re offend and with the knowledge gained at prisons believe that they will not get caught. This source is helpful as it helps us understand the mindset of why many persons re offend despite the harsh sentences received. Criminals never commit a crime that they believe they will be prosecuted for.

After a person is arrested and found guilty, their whole life change. They are then identified as defendant, inmate, offender, prisoner, and ect. Therefore, it is best to provide rehabilitation to offenders in early stages to avoid stigma of themselves and the loss of their support system. Both, confinement and rehabilitation could work together with the necessary training and individuals to carry out the mission. As for the challenge of reintegration, it would be effective to provide the necessary changes to behaviors and the relationships with friends and family.

2) What are the names of the successful re-entry programs and how they work for the communities?

Community corrections are vital in ensuring and assuring the safety of the community by rehabilitating the low-risk offenders allowing cycle of re-offending to be broken and the rate of imprisonment to be lowered. Community corrections involve managing an offender’s life in the community through constant supervision and reporting to their corrections officer and, also court ordered unpaid community service and rehabilitation programs to divert their attention to re-offend, rather than throwing them into the prison system for a low-risk crime. The question however is whether the correction services are a success in minimising the re-offending and rehabilitating the offenders once let back into society. In the last 40 years or so, community corrections have become a substantial component of the correctional service system (White and Perrone, 2010). The movement towards community corrections advocates the decarceration of the prisoners and mental health patients and its was influenced by the reconceptualization of social control with the increasing development of community care and control. The main focus is to find a solution to minimise short-term imprisonment and whether alternate corrections have become a success.

Please accept this letter as application for your Reentry Case Manager position as advertised on ConnectVA. I believe my pervious internship experience at OAR of Richmond along with my current role as a Correctional Officer will make me great applicant to your join your team of driven staff at OAR of Richmond.

People from all over the world immigrate. There is a plethora of reasons immigrants leave for other countries; ranging from war, opportunities, or the pursuit of new surroundings. All countries have their processes for immigrants to become legal citizens of their state; however, this process is not always followed due to circumstances determined by the individual. These citizens, many unregistered, leave their homes for other countries but do not go through the process of becoming legal citizens. A majority of these people come in search of refuge and citizenship, but didn’t finish the proceedings to become citizens. If there were programs to help them, then the immigrants would be better off. A program that would allow for the adults to work or gain an education, allow the children to be taught about their new world while keeping community of their own, all while allowing the world they are now a part of to benefit as well. A program similar to the federal teacher loan forgiveness program, but focusing on helping unregistered citizens. C.A.I.T.T., children and adults immigration translations teachings, is a program with the focus on allowing the adult immigrants to work towards becoming citizens, while providing education and community for the children. C.A.I.T.T. will provide a critical service allowing for the adults to focus on work and passing the citizenship test, done by creating a place for the immigrant children, and providing work for newly graduates by use of the

“Mainly, we take care of reintigration needs of migrant workers [here in NRCO],” said Dela Fuente. “We help them find new jobs and renew their lives.”