Reflection On Epic System

This case analysis of Stanford’s Hospital and Clinics (SHC) electronic medical record (EMR) system implementation will focus on how the healthcare organization focused on resolving a problem to meet regulatory pressures and responded to an opportunity to create operational efficiency, by capitalizing on the use of information technology to help reduce costs. We will discuss the organization’s IT problems, opportunities, and the alternatives available to address each. We will summarize an analysis of potential alternatives including the organization’s EMR system of choice and conclude with a recommendation to the Board on how to rollout the new system.

I attended several meetings where HM EPIC Leaders are preparing community hospitals wave 2 for the transition to EPIC. HM are following the PROSCI ADKAR model (Hiatt, 2016) to manage such a huge change, they are targeting to prepare the whole operational team for the EMR adoption and it is not just an IT solution implementation.

In early 2011 Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin (CHW) informed it patients and the general public that it would be fully immersed in another version of the electronic health record system, EPIC, by the completion of the 2012-2013 fiscal year. With so many hospital, clinic, and community locations, the hospital needed to implement the system in phases and fully engage thousands of

Our one hundred bed hospital is in need of updating from paper charting to computerized health records. In doing this, we will meet our goal of compliance with meaningful use legislation. We assembled a team of members to assist with this task and together we have narrowed the search to two health care systems. Those two systems are EPIC and Meditech and we will now discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each, with a final recommendation for our new healthcare system.

The medical staff has been using “best of breed” systems and has concerns of loss of key functions. However, they agreed to adopt EPIC, an enterprise-wide system designed for maximal integration and continuity of care throughout the continuum. This agreement was reached without any understanding of a potential loss of functionality in the new system, and an assumption the new system will be acceptable to the physicians once installed.

I’m glad to hear that your hospital is getting the Epic network. We have had both negative and positive experiences with the Epic system. Much of the frustration had to do with the way applications were set up and needing time to learn new system. On the hand, electronic documentation has enhanced communication between clinicians including nurses. Also, electronic documentation reduces medical errors and improves patient care. Although electronic documentation has improved nurse’s communication and efficeincy, it brought new terminologies that are specific to electronic documentation. These terminologies are standardized and require nurses to learn and use accurately (Sewell, 2016).

aperwork; the NYU Langone Medical Center chooses to implement new health informatics technologies to impact its health care delivery and management by purchasing their "Meaningful Use" Certified electronic health records system, “Epic.” Because the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) stimulus package allocation of funds for hospitals who meet the requirements of what is known as "Meaningful

In efforts to reform the United States healthcare system and create a nationally unified data exchange system the federal government has established an incentive program to eligible professionals and hospitals. The federal government has turned to certified electronic health record (EHR) technology to help facilitate the process of broadening health IT infrastructures. The federal government views EHR system used in meaningful ways as the key to reforming the healthcare systems. Meaningful use of the EHR systems can also improve the overall quality of healthcare, insure patient safety, as well as reduce the cost of healthcare to individuals (Bigalke & Morris, 2010, p. 116).

My facility has rolled out the implementation of Epic electronic health system. The implementation process started at the primary acute hospital setting, beginning on a test unit. It was then rolled out to the other hospital locations. All health care providers were mandated to

Throughout this report, the interoperability and communication between departments will be discussed in detail, in order to improve throughput using the current software system, Epic in this case. The goal is optimal patient outcomes using electronic prescribing. A solution will be reviewed utilizing Epic, a standard electronic health record (EHR) involving the HL7 initiatives.

A wave of medical errors and patient deaths caused by healthcare providers renewed the search for a viable EHR system in 2000. Electronic health records would allow "providers to make better decisions and provide better

A.V. stated, “we have just upgraded our computer system to EPIC.” This new EHR is going to improve patient care. It will be more user friendly and eliminate some of the clicking and make it easier to navigate.”

By making health information accessible across an entire Acute Care System, Cerner EHR facilitates improved safety, care and coordination by providing clinicians with real-time health information, so that they are able to make more accurately informed decisions. Their electronic health records system eliminates the need for hand-written documentation, provides medical records clarity, improves accuracy and reduces errors. Cerner’s customizable applications were specifically designed to streamline both administrative and clinical tasks. These automated processes, ensures health care professionals are better equipped to maintain and perform all key administrative manipulations of clinical data relevant to each patient of record. Cerner EHR also

According to their website, Epic is a private and employee-owned company that “makes software for mid-size and large medical groups, hospitals and integrated healthcare organizations - working with customers that include community hospitals, academic facilities, children’s organizations, safety net providers and multi-hospital systems.” The core of Epic’s kernel is based off of on an antiquated programming language known as MUMPS (Massachusetts General Hospital Utility Multi-programming system) which was invented by a founder from rival Meditech in 1968. They [EPIC] have developed systems to seamlessly transition the state of medical records from a paper driven environment to a virtual environment. Epic allows

When implementing a new EHR, departments need to have a plan in place when the system causes change to the process and design within the organization. Often times, regulations and policies need to be changed to coincide with a new system in place, such as a new EHR program (University of Scranton, 2017). A way to mitigate this situation is to start at the federal level’s regulations and work down the scope from there. This will guarantee that mandatory rules are still being followed and there is successful transition into future policies. Additionally, funding will be crucial to the organization’s ability to have a new EHR system. Each department needs to ensure they are properly tracking funds and that they can afford to upgrade.