Reflection On Organizational Behavior

4. Briefly describe the elements of the formal and the informal organization. Give examples of each.

Classical organization theory evolved during the first half of this century. It represents the merger of scientific management, bureaucratic theory, and administrative theory.

Through this assignment, we will examine individual traits and how they integrate into organizational behavior. This project is conveyed from the first-person based on my personal experiences and results based on my answers from the “Project 2 Assessment” from McGraw Hill Connect. From the information gathered we discuss in three-parts, my personality triats, working with others, and my experience within an organizational setting. My paper will culminate by discussing my personal reflection of my strengths and weaknesses regarding the engagement of the Holy Spirit through them.

Organizational behavior is the study on how organizational structures affect behavior of its employees within the organization. Organizational systems is the structure that an organizations uses to organize its functions and assign responsibility to its employees. Organizational behavior in any criminal justice organization is how the superiors and the employees relate

Personality assessments can serve as a powerful and impactful tool that benefits the participants or others with whom your paths may cross. Inevitably, taking assessments like this requires self-awareness in order to maximize the value of the results. In this case, the McGraw-Hill assessment covered a wide array of topics which provided an extensive assessment of my values, personality style, motivational influences and contributing factors that drive my behaviors (McGraw-Hill Education, 2017). This evaluation offered me personal insights on how I behave in various situations, the impact my behavior may have on others, additional context around my personality traits and style, and organizational considerations that may influence my actions,

A modified version of the Big 5 Personality Test was taken to assess my weaknesses and aptitudes for leadership. The test was designed to analyze 45 aspects of personality, such as listening skills, emotional stability, communication skills, critical thinking, motivation to lead, and conflict management styles. My answers suggest I have significant room for improvement in the areas of assertiveness and consideration for others. Conversely, my test results suggest I have significant strengths in the areas of emotional stability and critical thinking. The assessment appeared to adequately reflect my personality based on my own self-perception. Lessons learned from both the assessment and course material were integrated, which facilitated deeper critical thinking in the subjects of organizational behavior and leadership skill development. Finally, the subject of organizational behavior was discussed as it pertains to biblical teachings.

The personality assessment inventory tests provide results on my individual personality, values, motivation, decision making, communication, team skills, conflict skills, organizational structure preference, and stress. These results are broken down briefly in three parts and do not include any personal speculation or analysis as to their meaning. The application of these results are further applied and explains how the results noted from the tests and in the first step will make me a better employee, co-worker, and manager within my organization. These tests mentioned above are applied in conjunction with particular examples on how I can achieve becoming a better employee, co-worker, and manager. An explanation of how my personality and experiences were affected by the Holy Spirit is also discussed. Particularly, how potential weaknesses have become strengths with the guidance of the Lord.

Organizational Behavior has taught me a lot in regards to learning to work with others and making groups of people work efficiently. While classroom readings and in-class slideshows have been valuable in understanding key concepts, my greatest personal growth has come from both your personal stories, as well as your many invaluable speakers. Throughout this paper, I will focus on the lessons your speakers have taught me, and how those shared lessons will have a positive impact on my future decision-making.

Although this was not the first personality assessment that I’ve completed, after reading this week’s study material, I can honestly say that I have gained a more expansive understanding and perspective on the subject. First, I had not considered the correlation between our covenant with God and the responsibility that we should maintain a similar engagement with one another on a day-to-day basis (Presentation: Lesson 1 – A Worldview Perspective on Organizational Behavior, 2012). While I knew that our personality type could provide context to how we may conduct ourselves in any given situation, I had not considered the broader connection to how our personality type also affects our ethical decision-making and problem-solving (Kinicki &

I have never studied such kind of courses before. My bachelor degree was related more to Law. First what I thought was Organizational Behavior class was something beyond me. In my point of view course was too complicated for me: everything in specific terminology and hard to understand. But after some time I was getting used to everything and even it was very interesting to do all work in group and have discussions on different situations everyone can face in an everyday life. So I completely changed my perception of this course.

The quest to discover what makes us who we are has created several different theories of personality. One of the eight aspects of personalities reviewed in this personality theory course is Neo-analytic and Ego Aspect approach to personality theory. The Neo-analytic approach which was derived from a revision to psychoanalytical theory, contains a basic concept of a multi-faceted personality theory, provides beneficial current day applications and does not encourage individuals to turn away from their spiritual faith.

After completing the Prentice Hall Self-Assessment Library Test (SAL), I have discovered how different strengths and weaknesses of my personality, which influence how I make decisions and interact with others in the work environment. Part one of the test “What About Me”, identified several areas of my personality that I wish to improve on. My scores for creativity, as well as emotional intelligence were lower than I expected, and therefore something that I can work to improve upon. The second part of the test, “Working with Others”, identified one major weakness in my leadership style. My scores indicated a potentially laissez-faire leadership style, indicating that I may sometimes appear detached and indifferent in the eyes of my co-workers. Finally, the third part of the test, “Life in Organizations”, offered no major surprises and generally fit well with how I view my attitudes towards organizational structure. From these results, I was able to identify areas which I would like to improve upon with regards to my leadership style and attitudes in order to become a better leader in my organization. Additionally, the results of this test afford us the ability to apply biblical ideas when working to improve faults in our personalities in order to be the best leaders we can be.

Personality has been inherently defined as possession of a particular set of characteristics possessed by people which influences their behaviour and reactions in different situation along with their motivation level to react to difficulties at the workplace. However, understanding personality traits and their development has been a contentious matter. Nonetheless, various theories have been forwarded to rather contribute to this contentious debate. For example employers set goals and encourage involvement with the company to have a better employee performance, which would result in higher motivation level subsequently leading to increased efficiency. Studies regarding the relationship between personality traits of a particular employee

Organizational Behavior is the study and application of understanding about how people, individuals, and groups act in organizations. Its function is to assemble better relationships by achieving human objectives, organizational objectives, and social objectives. Organizational behavior involves management paying attention to the employees’ issues, both work related and personal to make the work environment a better place. Organizational Behavior explains why an organization is only as popular and proficient as it’s employees that execute daily activities. According to Hunt, Osborn, and Schermerhorn (2005), “Individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors determine the behavior and ultimate value of an organization’s employees” (p.

To understand how personality has consequences and influences it has on performance, it would be vital to contrast organisations and a psychologists approach as well definition of personality in an accurate and detailing understanding. Personalities can play a vital role in employee performance, as psychology attempts to distinguish the differences between individuals. "Personality is the psychological qualities that influence an individual 's characteristics behaviour patterns, in a stable and distinctive manner" (Huczynski & Buchanan 2013). It would also be necessary to consider the performance of employees which would affect the needs and expectations of stakeholders '. Organisations and employees would be required deliver satisfying results which would benefit in profit and an exceptional reputation for the organisation, however not all organisations seek to earn profit. This would be classified as performance management, "performance management is a process by which the company manages its performance in line with its corporate and functional strategies and objectives" (Bitici, Carrie & McDevitt 1997. This essay will investigate how personality predicts employee performance and explore factors which organisations need to scrutinize in order to accomplish certain tasks.