Reflection On Sustainability And Nature

Rachel Carson’s Man and the Stream of time possesses enlightening perspectives of nature that have been marinating in her mind for ten years. Her writing reflects upon the effects that man has on nature and the role he plays in the ever changing environment. Her sole observation is that it is man’s nature to want to conquer the world, but nature is not one to be conquered. The writer affirms that nature is an entity that must be dignified, Like English poet Francis Thompson said, “Thou canst not stir a flower without troubling of a star.” Most environmentalist would agree that nature is not stationary, we cut the trees now today, its not just the trees that disappear ten years from now. As humanity advances, we create a multitude of

Irma, Harvey, Mexico City earthquake, the 2011 tsunami in japan, Haiti earthquake; nature time and time again smites us with its relentless and unmatched force. Though out the years mankind has battled for survival against the brutal conditions nature has thrown at them and they have created themselves. Continually, without hesitation, they have risen from these disasters to build and grow a new. Yet still, mankind seems to bath in its own naivety at the truth of what nature really is for them. Without haste they push against nature and forget all it has done for them. This idea of respect, however is not so easily forgotten by all. Many writers and poets tell beautiful stories and tales of the power and care of mother nature’s hand extends. One such poem, “The earth is a living thing”, by Lucille Clifton, brilliantly adds to such ideas. The idea that nature poses not only strength but the smarts and heart right along with it. A concept that is not readily shared by many essay writers. Despite these other writers, John Muir follows suit with Clifton in, “A Wind-Storm in the Forest”. Where Muir bashes his reader with the harsh reality of winter, followed by an explanation of the gentle caring hand nature extends to us all. Mother nature has the power to shelter and protect, nurture and grow, but also has the power to demolish and take away everything

And, by referencing an “ecologist”, the speaker reinforces the verity of their contention, prompting those who are sceptical to reconsider their beliefs. Additionally, the image which portrays the world in an individual’s hands supports the speakers’ contention by highlighting the actions of world leaders to be paramount in protecting earth, visually reinforcing that the future is in the hands of world leaders, the speakers’

Recently, Pope Francis has modernized the Roman Catholic Church by urging followers to support scientists in preserving our environment. Pope Francis has drawn parallels between “the scientific and Christian communities, who are witnessing the convergence of their distinct approaches to reality in the shared goal of protecting our common home, threatened as it is by ecological collapse and consequent increase of poverty and social exclusion” (Pope Francis). As the contemporary world faces new problems, like climate change, Roman Catholic Christianity has supported the need for science as a means to preserve the Earth and guard humanity.

Discussing Critically Religious and Secular Ethical Arguments About Environmental Issues In his book, 'The End Of Nature', Bill McKibben highlights the fact that we are destroying the natural environment at an increasing rate, for our own short-term gain. Since the day that man created agriculture, and industrialisation to follow, the imbalance between man and nature has been growing[1/2]. This has been accompanied by a massive population increase, tripling in the twentieth century alone[3]. Human pressure on nature has never been so great.

Christian voice is correcting them or proclaiming the biblical model of man’s relationship to nature which: is unique and superior to the dominant free-market and environmentalist models. . According to Gardner and Stern (1996), in that place are exclusive approaches that have power to be implemented in companionships search to defend the environment. One like approach may take a closer look at holy and regarding duties beliefs and the effects of these beliefs on the environment. The idea to create values and beliefs in environmental issues are important components of having a safer and enjoyable world for its people and the world they live in. Christian and non-Christian, at hand, must see the environment and the shortcoming of business by reason of a proper conversion to an act or purpose of and preservation of the wealth the planet has to support life. Christians as the Bible originate directing the eye to what has to be published by word force in reference to human natures dependence and bounden duty to the nature and its resources. As Christians we should do what ever it takes to make sure this earth glorify God. If we are careless about science and economics — not caring about how they work and what they describe, creation’s economy will suffer (Christians Research Institute).

It was once said, “The clearest way into the Universe is through a forest wilderness.” Throughout the years many people have made changes to our universe by teaching up to value our environment. Ecocriticism is using literature to teach us about environmental consequences and give us possible solutions. The novels Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson, The Lorax, by Dr Seuss, and Moths of the Limberlost, by Gene Stratton Porter, were all literary examples of ecocriticism and greatly influenced their readers’ views on the environment. When it jumped into the spotlight in the 1060’s, Silent Spring by Rachel Carson quickly put a new view on the impact of humans on the environment.

McFague poses the question “Is the environment a religious issue?” Many Americans believe that our deteriorating planet can be solved by science and new technology. It isn’t that simple. The environmental crisis involves all people with all areas or expertise and religions. It is about applying “household rules” to keep the planet flourishing: take only your share, clean up after yourself, and keep the house in good repair for those to come. There are two worldviews, neoclassical economics and ecological economics. McFague presents reasons why ecological economics is more beneficial to flourishing the planet. Neoclassical economics sees humans on the planet as individuals drawn together to fully make use of natural resources. Ecological economics sees the planet as a community that survives only through the interdependence of all its parts, human and nonhuman. Ecological economics concerns the health of the whole planet. This view helps us to picture ourselves not as isolated individuals but as housemates. McFague response to the environmental crisis is in four steps. First, we should become conscious of neoclassical economics as a model of how to allocate scarce resources. Second, we need to suggest some visions of the good life that are not consumer-dominated, visions that are just and stainable. Third, we need to publicly advocate the ecological model as the more just and sustainable one for our society. Lastly, we should rethink what the ecological economic context would mean for the basic doctrines of Christianity. The planet will flourish with this ecological

The pope urges readers to “change direction” by realizing the significance, and acting on the task of “caring for our common home” suggesting everyone should be aware and proactive about the current situation. He acknowledges that there is a “growing sensitivity” but about protecting nature he argues

Religion and ecology are two concepts that rarely intersect in popular culture. Religious individuals are expressed as devout followers of strict doctrine where ecologists are often seen as free flowing lovers of peace. These polar opposite perceptions impact not only the cultural views of those practicing these beliefs, but they also influence the way each group is seen in the world. One religion that is commonly referenced in our society’s popular culture is Christianity. Due to its anthropocentric teachings, Christianity is often seen not just as the opposite of environmentalism, but also in many ways: the enemy. On the other hand, Christians are also viewed as individuals who contribute heavily to improving our world through many different positive campaigns focused around aiding both people and the world in which we live. So in this mix of many different reputations and ideas, where does Christianity truly stand? Does it help the environment or hurt it? Though the Christian faith has potential causes for ecological damage, its beliefs are largely misunderstood, and there are many more factors to explore in regards to the environmental crisis than one religious doctrine. Christianity is not solely responsible for the ecological crisis.

The role of religion in creating and maintaining environmental sustainability is to connect with people emotionally to make them understand that their actions towards the environment influence their own life and other people’s live. Religion makes the issue of climate change become personal to initiate action. Three ways in which religion fulfills this role is by asserting that care for the environment is our moral responsibility, arguing that environmental stability is pivotal to the common good, and becoming a new authority by acknowledging the scientific facts of climate change and moving beyond them to reach people on a different level. There is scientific unanimity that climate change is happening and that human beings are to blame (“Climate

In his inspiring and indescribably powerful encyclical, “Laudato Si”, Pope Francis offers moral, as well as spiritual arguments for the necessity of sustainability and protection of the environment. Pope Francis argues from many different standpoints in “Laudato Si.” He argues from ecocentric, anthropocentric, and spiritual standpoints at different times throughout the encyclical. However, his central argument lies in the fact that everything on this earth was created by God; we have a duty to protect it, and no right to harm it. To achieve this goal of protecting our common home, he says we must create a new dialogue about the environment which includes all people. This argument is based on the moral principles upheld by the Catholic Church, such as subsidiarity, doing things for the common good of all people, and addressing social justice issues. The Pope’s point about starting a dialogue with all people relates back to the very first class reading by Christopher Uhl, in which he argues that our society needs to rewrite the “deeply ingrained, and largely invisible story,” of economism to one that supports sustainability and care for the environment (Uhl 7). Our current society and way we live our lives is not sustainable or environmentally conscious, and something obviously needs to change.

This essay will review two significant environmental experiences I have encountered exploring the influences of these my life and how these have altered my view on what is environmental sustainability. An examination into these two experiences will follow into reviewing my perspectives on environmental sustainability and how these two experiences influenced this. To conclude a discussion on my role as a teacher and how this will impact myself when in the classroom.

Pope Francis describes a relentless exploitation and destruction towards environmental discomfort, for which he blamed apathy from the pursuit of profitable faith in political as well as technological injustice. The Laudato Si’ unambiguously accepts scientific causes that impacts the climate that were beneficially man-made, stating “climate change is a global problem with grave implications: environmental, social, economic, political and for the distribution of goods”. Representing one of the principals that challenges humanity. After great anticipation, Pope Francis determined and faced the difficulties of climate change and pleaded for justice, to “enter into dialogue with all people about our common home.” The Pope reaches for new conclusions and is calling for a spiritual transformation and a solid connection to Earth’s ecosystems. The Laudato Si’ is different, as it is not addressed specifically to the one beliefs with additional groups added. Pope Francis invites the people of the world to a dialogue on the subject of environmentalism. Pope Francis has written Laudato Si’ as caring for creation is something that is close to his heart. More fundamentally, Pope Francis believes that there are substantial ecological complications today that must be addressed. They include not only problems in the natural environment but also in the human sphere, particularly among the disadvantaged. Pope Francis wrote the encyclical, dated 24 May 2015 and was officially published at on 18

In such apprehensive condition, our firm is experiencing a serious issue being an environmental group is emphasizing non biodegradable materials of SafePack. There is an increased emphasis on sustainability of environment. The sustainability of environmental is completely associated with making better decision and performing corrective actions that are favorable in sustaining the nature of world, with particular emphasis on preserving the environment’s capability for the life of humans. Presently, it’s a significant topic, as it’s comprehended by businesses and individuals and has inclusive impact on the environment. The sustainability of environment is intimately associated with effective decision making with major objective