Last year, our new government was formed. We agreed to what the Articles had said. It seems that now we are having issues with what we had once agreed with. In this newsletter, I will only address four of the most problematic things in the Articles of Confederation. However there are many more that will not be brought to light today. The first problem I will bring up is how we only have one branch of the government, the Congress or legislative branch. Sense we only have one group of people saying what we can and cannot do, it resembles the monarchy we just separated from. Plus they can only make laws, not enforce them or interpret them. A solution is that we could put other branches in place so multiple groups have the same amount of power. …show more content…
Now, before you burn down the State Times building, here me out. I am not saying they should tax us as much as the British did. I am saying that we should have it be mandatory that states give money to the government so they have enough money to protect us. Without the money, the army men aren’t getting paid and no one wants to serve our country for nothing. It’s just a fact. Would you work for someone without getting paid? The last problem that I am addressing today is that the government managed agreements with other countries and Indians. I am not saying that is bad, but without money to pay the people who are doing this for us, we might end up in another war. We need qualified people to do this job, not some farmer with a grudge against other countries. If we just let the government tax us, the right people will be doing the negotiating and we won’t have to fight another country. With these changes, we could fix these problems. If we put other branches in place so multiple groups have the same amount of power. If we change the voting to 58% instead of 100%. If we have it be mandatory that states give money to the government, and let the qualified people have the money they deserve, we could have a functioning
Separation of power was the first way the founders prevented tyranny. In document 1 the text states ¨the founding fathers created government that was separated into three branches.¨ This shows that no branch would have
Legislative: Our Legislative branch will be bicameral with two houses, the House of Representatives and the house of Senate. We are keeping both houses, that way we can separate the workload. We will have a total of 400 people in both houses. The people would be represented by direct election. People will also be allowed to give the government ideas about laws. In order for a law to be passed both houses have to agree on it as well as the President. Having more opinions on the laws should help determine if the law should be passed or not. The President from the executive branch can request for the law to be denied if both houses agree.The executive and judicial branches also have the power to change a law in a way that seems better for them and the country.
The government established by the Articles of Confederation lacked the coherence, strength, and cooperation needed to spur the young nation to success, instead wreaking havoc politically, defensively, and economically. For example, because there was neither a national currency nor regulation of commerce, the mid-1780s were stricken with inflation and economic depression. Moreover, due to the absence of a national legislature, laws varied from state to state; thus, Congress had difficulty passing and enforcing laws and taxes. Lastly, the nation lacked strong, solid leadership to guide decisions and head foreign affairs. In essence, at the time of America’s new-found independence from Britain, the Articles failed to provide a unified government
From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation did not provide the United States with an effective government. This is due to the following three reasons: The United States’ lack of an army, nonexistent judicial branch, and surplus of power to the states. After the American Revolution concluded, thousands of soldiers returned home to find little or nothing left. Financial support the government had promised the soldiers with after the war was no longer available due to the inability of the central government to collect taxes as stated in the Articles (Doc. C). This later resulted in Shays’ Rebellion, a march led by Daniel Shays in western Massachusetts during January of 1787.
Unfortunately for the National Government, Congress did not have any power to collect taxes from people in each individual state. The Congress could ask for money, but could not by any mean force states to pay them. The National Government greatly needed money to cover expenses and debts. Congress could not pay the Nation’s debt, which meant they could not provide much needed
Second, the constitution does not give enough power to the people. We need the states to have more power and the national government less. The country is too big for a national government to take care of the needs of the citizens properly. We also need to see a legislative branch have more power and an executive branch less power. More representation in the
The concept of power is a divisive matter in the American political system, as the actors holding it are sometimes unable to impose it as a result of their limited authority to do so. The legislative, executive, and judicial branches in the national government depend on each-others point of view. Part of the Constitution was designed with the purpose of making it impossible for either of these three to become more powerful than the others. Each of them has the ability to check and balance the way that the other two function. In spite of the fact that this system was created with the intention of preventing power from being shared unequally in the country, it sometimes serves as a tool for political gridlock, considering that the judicial branches can debate in regard to a particular topic for unlimited amounts of time before actually reaching a conclusion regarding the respective issue.
Ratified March 1, 1781, the Articles of Confederation united the colonies of the American Revolution into a loose confederation. The implementation of the Articles was short lived, being replaced by the United States Constitution seven short years later on September 13, 1788. Due to this short application in history, many Americans are unaware that the Constitution was a replacement of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles attempted to establish a government radically different from the current U.S. government. A deeper understanding of these Articles can lead to a clearer understanding of the founding of the United States of America, and why the Constitution of the United States calls for
The national government of the United States had many challenges under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles caused money problems and the most essential detail, a weak government. This also caused America conflicts among each of the 13 states. These problems greatly impacted the United States and it’s government as well.
Each branch should not obtain too much power in choosing each other’s members. Judges should have higher power, but be lifted in political temptations. Their opinion shouldn’t be influenced by other offcials. All branches must keep others in control, but also keep themselves under control. They should not depend on each other too much. Powers should be divided in order to keep one another in check. We must keep majority groups from becoming too powerful and combining to over power the minorities. Anarchy would break out and government would fall
The topic of this paper is the Constitution. The paper will cover the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation, which was addressed in the Constitution. The paper will cover the how the Constitution addressed the complaints in the Declaration of Independence. Another topic of the paper will be the Great Compromise and how the representation of states in Congress was determined. Finally, the paper will view the treatment of slaves for the purpose of representation and the effects thereof.
I like the idea of check and balance. It is a fundamental principle of the U.S. Government guaranteed by the Constitution where it prevents any one branch of government from accumulating too much power. It goes hand in hand with separation of powers, another fundamental principle, where responsibilities are divided among each branch, the legislative branch, executive branch and judicial branch. Like you mentioned above “no one branch of government can be more powerful that the other two branches…” and so they are given each specific
The first Philosophy of discussion is Montesquieu and the separation in powers. Montesquieu decision on separating powers of government i agree with one hundred percent.Because of the fact one branch of government could get more powerful than the other so by having three branches of government helps due to the fact one system cannot make a decision on their own without having other people have a say and input on the topic or the way things go.I feel this helped a lot separating the powers of government because if there was only one person with all that power they could take advantage and make decisions that were not very good. So by having more people involved it helps a lot and is more organized and everything is better than what it could have been .
With the United States new found independence from Great Britain, its founding fathers realize from their historical experiences that a document of law needed to be crafted and established to preserve its new found independence, while maintaining order. However, the first document crafted by the founding fathers, the Articles of Confederation, did preserve the country new found independence but it did not maintain order. The Articles of Confederation described by many founding fathers to be a document that was crafted to satisfy needs of every state for its ratification, even when the document did not present a responsible democracy. The Articles of Confederation granted all national powers to the congress; however, it allowed each state
The United States government has transformed since it's beginning in 1776. The transformations have been good and bad for the general public. Some of the issues that are part of the problem in the government, are such things as the spoils system, tariffs and bimetallism.The reason why it is so hard to change these issues is because the people in charge are benefiting from them, even though the general public may not be.