Regulatory Origins Of The Flash Crash

Firstly, the background of passing Dodd-Frank Act is the financial crisis. The direct reason of this crisis is that many banks, for the purpose of the making profits, were engaged in the high-risk subprime mortgage. Finally, the default of repayment leads to the

The Federal Government needs to make sure to enforce strict guidelines on who can and cannot be accepted for a home loan, and not allow big investors to borrow excessive money at low interest rates to inflate the investor’s financial advantage. If the government starts allowing lower standards on mortgages, we are going to end up in the same catastrophe once again. In an article written by U.S. News and World Reports entitled Should the Federal Government Provide Support to the Mortgage Market?, the Federal government and the President attempted to get involved with the housing market. The passage implicated that Obama wanted to do away with federally funded conglomerates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and implement another type of government assisted program ("Should the Federal Government"). The program would prevent the mistakes made by Fannie and Freddie which created the original “housing bubble burst” ("Should the Federal Government"). One of the Senate bills suggests the government create “a new agency, the Federal Mortgage Insurance Corporation to replace Fannie and Freddie” ("Should the Federal

The Dodd-Frank Act was enacted to deal with the various problems occurred in the financial crisis. The paramount reason I choose this law is it has brought the most significant changes in the federal financial regulation since the regulatory reform that followed the Great Depression. (Damian & Lucchetti, 2010)

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a mammoth part of financial reform legislation passed by the Obama presidential term in 2010 as a reaction to the financial crisis of 2008. The act's many provisions, implied out over thousands of pages, are scheduled to be taken over a point of several years and are intended to decrease various risks in the U.S. fiscal system. The act established a number of new government agencies tasked with supervision over various components of the act. There are so many provisions, such as financial stability, orderly liquidation authority, transfer of power to comptrollers, FDIC and Fed, Hedge funds, insurance, pay it back Act, and Etc, which contribute to better department and regulations.

One way that might have prevented the mass hysteria would have been, to put a limit at the bank, on withdraws. For example, instead of allowing a person to withdraw everything from their account, perhaps allow them only to withdraw small increments over a period of time rather then all at once. Banks needed insurance (such as FDCI) implemented before the crash, for prevention of problems. It was implemented after the crash had already taken place; the damage had been done.

History has shown us again, and again that when power is left unchecked it becomes corrupt and out of control, that is the iron law of oligarchy. In the US we saw this happen recently in the 2008 economic meltdown. The banks and corporations should never have been aloud to become "to big to fail," and once they did grow to a point when they were there should have been more government oversight to make sure things did not get out of hand. After the great depression laws were put in place to try to prevent something like that from ever happening again, but we undid those restrictions and ended up in a place eerily similar to somewhere we had been before. In this paper I will cover a brief history of the great depression, and show how the situation in 2008 was all too similar. I will also discuss and analyze the factors that brought us to the tipping point in our most recent economic scare. And finally I will explain why the actions taken by the FED were necessary and kept us from an even more

“As a result of this movement, the banking laws changed. Congress began to investigate in more depth of the money used to support banks. Eventually Congress changed the level of liquidity of the banks once realizing they were too low.” This movement helped congress recognized a huge flaw in banking services. Also, an act was passed by Barack Obama on July 21, 2010. This act was known as the Dodd-Frank Act. “In the fall of 2008, a financial crisis of a scale and severity not seen in generations left millions of Americans unemployed and resulted in trillions in lost wealth. Our broken financial regulatory system was a principal cause of that crisis. It allowed some irresponsible lenders to use hidden fees and fine print to take advantage of consumers.To make sure that a crisis like this never happens again, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act into law. The most far reaching Wall Street reform in history, Dodd-Frank will prevent the excessive risk-taking that led to the financial crisis. The law also provides common-sense protections for American families, creating new consumer watchdog to prevent mortgage companies and pay-day lenders from exploiting

Regulating Wall Street: The Dodd-Frank Act. Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 2011. Economic Perspective.

In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, a Democrat Congress and President Barack Obama passed the Dodd-Frank Act, which in turn unleashed a flood regulations and created the CFPB. While their intent of protecting the little guy is praiseworthy, the legislation had the opposite effect. Since its inception, the CFPB became

The united states is currently the proprietor of nearly nineteen trillion dollars in debt, and that number continues to increase to by 2.53 billion per day. With close to three hundred million people in the united states each shared citizen’s debt would be around sixty-one thousand dollars. (debt calculator website). In 2008 at the end of the George bush administration the country was said to be in the worst economic recession since the great depression. The current president of the united states, Barack Obama and his administration proposed a bill to congress in 2009, that was believed to assist in the prevention of another recession. This bill was titled “The Dodd Frank initiative and consumer protection act.” It was named after the two legislators who created it, Chis Dodd and Barney Frank. This initiative was, and continues to be, considered a “massive” piece of legislation. (quote). Although introduced, It did not pass in congress until July 21, 2010. In addition to assisting with the economy, this act was created to help insure that consumers would not be easily taken advantage of by major financial agencies and corporations. All of us, no matter age, gender, or financial status are consumers. This act has put checks and balances in place that will protect all families from making financial decision that might cripple them into a situation that may make it impossible to get out

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed to redesign numerous areas of the US regulatory system and to protect consumers against mortgage companies, banks, and other entities that were gambling and taking excessive risks with the consumers’ financial assets7. The act promised to restore America and create new jobs for those who had lost everything during the financial crisis of 2008. When the crisis occurred, Wall Street “did not have the tools to break apart or wind down a failing financial firm without putting the American taxpayer and the entire financial system at risk,” and Washington did not have the power to oversee and limit the risk-taking behavior that was taking place at the time7. The act is composed of sixteen titles, each one can be considered a powerful law individually; however, the act comprised them all together to have a major impact on the economy.

In this essay, I will briefly explain what happened during the financial crisis of 2007-09, and also discuss the contribution of the government to the financial crisis.

However, after five years of the financial crisis happened in 2008, is the “too big to fail” problem being solved or controlled? Jim Puzzanghera who published his article on Los Angeles Times insists that banks considered too big to fail are even bigger now. Puzzanghera provides his opinion based on the data he collected, “Just before the financial crisis hit, Wells Fargo & Co. had $609 billion in assets. Now it has $1.4 trillion. Bank of America Corp. had $1.7 trillion in assets. That's up to $2.1 trillion.” Puzzanghera explores that one main concern of coming out with a solution to this “too big to fail” problem is that Democrats and Republicans rarely reach an agreement on the problem. Most Democrats are willing for the federal authority to seize the power and to get rid of the firms if they are too big to fail while most Republicans do not want to force the banks to shrink. In stead of regulating those big financial firms, “the government's new power to seize large financial firms teetering near collapse could result in them being rescued instead of shut down, in effect enshrining

There has been a debate for years on what caused the Financial Crisis in 2008 and if there was one main cause, or a series of unfortunate events that led to the crisis. The crisis began when the market was no longer funding many financial entities. The Federal Reserve then lowered the federal funds rate from 5.25% to almost zero percent in December 2008. The Federal Government realized that this was not enough and decided to bail out Bear Stearns, which inhibited JP Morgan Chase to buy Bear Stearns. Unfortunately Bear Stearns was not the only financial entity that needed saving, Lehman Brothers needed help as well. Lehman Brothers was twice the size of Bear Stearns and the government could not bail them out. Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy on September 15, 2008. Lehman Brothers bankruptcy caused the market tensions to become disastrous. The Fed then had to bail out American International Group the day after Lehman Brothers failed (Poole, 2010). Some blame poor policy making and others blame the government. The main causes of the financial crisis are the deregulation of banks and bank corruption.

The first can be associated with the arrival of new information. For instance, as an exogenous flash crash, one could mention the turmoil generated as Switzerland abandoned the cap on the currency's value; another instance is the crash attributed to the hack of the twitter account of Associated Press. Moreover, some others flash crashes have no clear cause. Their underlying nature is challenging researchers, regulators and practitioners. The causes are still unclear for events such as May 6h, 2010, and also for the Flash Rally on August 24, 2015, \citep{BPFC,APHack,JSR1,JSR}.