Rehabilitating Offenders Research Paper

Prison is obviously not working on rehabilitating prisoners because there are prisoners who are released, but they don't return to prison. Yet, the majority of prisoners released do go back to jail. Criminals think they're not going to get caught or they're so emotionally desperate or psychologically distressed that they don't care about the consequences. To lower the recidivism prisons should offer real rehabilitation to prisoners. Criminals are not all waste people; most of them could just have haven a crisis that make them commit the crimes.

Due to the positive feedback that I received in Unit 3, I remained on the topic of “Ex-Offenders Reform Programs. This is an important topic because I am an ex-offender and I utilized the resources Wisconsin Ex-Offenders Reentry Programs provided by The Department of Corrections.

Family members who have seen this from their delinquent, have seen the change where the ex-offender has felt their feelings from their actions taken. Having education improvements, communication tools, help coping with their negative influences, and practicing the ways on how to deal with the conditions of real life during the rehabilitation will help the individual from being incarcerated once again for the same or different issue. Not always it this the case. The increase in money have funded the operating costs for more prisons, not more rehabilitation. Fewer programs and lack of incentives to participate, mean fewer inmates leave prison having completing their work, education, and fixing their possible substance abuse problems (When Prisoners Return to the Community: Political, Economic, and Social Consequences, 2000).

     The idea of sentencing a criminal for a period of time in a prison isn't working, so prisons should focus more on changing their rehabilitation programs. Life in prison should be like the outside world as much as possible, given the fact of imprisonment. Prisoners would be less prepared if the prison environment is artificial and abnormal compared to the outside world they will have to encounter later on. A prisoner also needs to keep family ties. Research in

There are many people who are critical of the US‘s prison sysetm; the idea of locking up those who commit crimes against a society simply to keep them from doing harm. Many say that more rehabilatation is necessary to improve these individuals and, therefore, society as a whole. What are some ways of doing this? Do you agree/disagree with this view and why? Is the prison system currently in place the best option for society? 2 pages, double spaced, 12pt. font.

To combat these issues various steps need to be taken three different areas of reform. The first being preparing prisoners for reentry into the community. Starting namely with keeping the prisoners with longer sentences updated on relevant technology and social, political, and legal changes so they know how to operate and function in a modern society upon release. Another essential part of preparing offenders for reentry would be providing housing upon release for all those who are unable to afford housing or do not have housing that does not violate probation requirements. Secondly, training offenders valuable life skills while imprisoned should heighten their chance for success upon release. Continuing programs that allow offenders to obtain

Modern day prisons are being shoved full of a number different crimes, however many of these offenders are serving time for non-violent crimes such as drug offences or white collar crimes. Especially with the war on drugs and the large percentage of drug offenders being put behind bars for years and years for, realistically not a lot, the criminal justice system has been trying to come up with new ways to deal with these offenders. Although it has been improving, there are still an abundance of non violent offenders in US state and federal prisons that would most likely profit from other means of rehabilitiation then just fences and cells. Overcrowding prisons with inmates that could benefit from other types of punishment or treatment is at an all time high. There are many different ways to deal with different offenders, they are not just limited to prison or jail time like in the past. These options include probation, halfway houses, community corrections, and electronic monitoring to name a few. These alternatives to prison can greatly change the way we perceive and treat non violent offenders, most notably drug offenders.

Sadly, these programs only succeed in a very low percent of ex-convicts, and the money that the government spends to keep criminals locked up is pretty huge compared with the resources invested in their rehabilitation. Political leaders should work together with government organizations in paving the way for all of those just getting out of prison. Another positive step to keep those people out of prison is to create programs in which felons could learn new professions, most of them go to jail at very early age and when they leave prison, they have no job skill that would help them become gainfully

As a country, we should care about all of our citizens and work toward bettering them, because we are only as strong as our weakest link. When it concerns the issue of corrections it should not be a discussion of punishment or rehabilitation. Instead, it should be a balance of both that puts the spotlight on rehabilitating offenders that are capable and willing to change their lives for the better. Through rehabilitation a number of issues in the corrections field can be solved from mental health to overcrowding. More importantly, it allows offenders the chance to do and be better once released from prison. This paper analyzes what both rehabilitation and punishment are as well as how they play a part in corrections. It also discusses the current reasons that punishment as the dominant model of corrections is not as effective as rehabilitation. After explaining rehabilitation and punishment, then breaking down the issues with punishment, I will recommend a plan for balance. A plan that will lower incarceration rates and give offenders a second chance.

Community corrections is continually changing and has been for the past one hundred years. From the early to mid-twentieth century onward it has used three major models, the medical model, community model, and the crime control model. The major turning point for the American community corrections system that led to corrections as we know it today was in 1974 when What Works? - Questions and Answers About Prison Reform by Martinson was published. The system changed practically overnight across the nation. The notion of rehabilitating offenders was dismissed and a more punitive “lock them up and throw away the key” mentality took over. Presently the corrections system is still working in the crime control model, but professionals are trying to restructure how we deal with criminal offenders during and after incarceration. The difficulty in the restructuring is finding the balance between punishing criminal offenders proportionate to their crime, but also rehabilitating them to be productive members of society once they are released so that they do not recidivate.

I agree with your point about the failure of the incapacitation as a strategy. Rehabilitation theory is an important debate we should be having concerning the primary purpose of the Criminal Justice system. Even from the word penitence which means to reform one life: to rehabilitate, the point of criminal justice should be to get justice for the offended and rehabilitate the offender with a view to preventing him or her from committing another crime. Advocates of rehabilitation believe that recidivism can be reduced by changing the criminal. Money needs to be redirected towards actual rehabilitation in prisons so that offenders can be released with new skill sets and they are able to support themselves and be able to move away from the wrong

Prisons not only rehabilitate, but they also deter people from going to prison. The fear of going to prison is a great deterrence for a perspective criminal. Hard life styles along with loss of freedom tend to push the criminal away from the chance of being incarcerated. Numbers show that there are fewer rapes, and fewer murders, each year, all an obvious product of prison deterrence. After all, if a person has a friend who just got out of jail, and hears all of the war stories, that person would surely not want to go to prison and end up like his friend. By making life in prison hard, the prison is doing a great job in getting the word out. Prison is no joke! They are doing their job in deterring criminals from wanting to enter the gates of hell.

Most prisons offer programs that will help the offender to rehabilitate, such programs can help the offender with anger management, domestic violence, drink & driving, alcohol abuse, and drug rehabilitation. Personally I believe that we should work hard on rehabilitating all offenders but especially the juveniles because they are not as competent as adults and there is a greater likelihood that they will change, although the main focus should be on rehabilitation of all offenders therefore making our communities safer.

The support from family members of offenders in the rehabilitation process is critical. It is important to allow the offender a choice of the best member to represent them through their time in need. Keep in mind, the chosen individual will assist the social worker or probation throughout the process of completion. You also mentioned other key players within the community to positively impact the overall progress of the offenders. Therefore, every member involved has to understand the role they're playing in the process. Good paper!

The idea that more effort should be made to reform offenders is a theme that that been persistent throughout the history of American corrections. Rehabilitative ideals have helped lead the way in the renovation of the correctional system. Implementations of intermediate sentencing, parole, probation, and a separate juvenile justice system were all part of the process. While the rehabilitation process seems like the perfect plan to transform the incarcerated, can prisoners truly be rehabilitated, or should punishment merely be retributive in nature? Looking at Robert Matinson 's theories in What Works? Questions and Answers About Prison Reform while comparing it to other scholars with help to answer this