Reign Of Terror Dbq Research Paper

In the result of the growing opinion extremist began an oligarchy Committee of Public Safety who stood for things , as liberté , equalite , fraternite. Slowly the very man who started an revolt was revolted against by the people he fought for . The conservatives still overthrew Robespierre and the committee of public safety and Robespierre was unfortunately beheaded . “The principle of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation. No body nor individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the nation.” In the D.O.R.O.M they say the choice relies wit the nation and the nation no longer wanted Robespierre as their leader , and the committee took it in strive. Still many french believe without a radical self-righteous leader like Robespierre the french wouldn't have an infamous great Emperor like Napoleon Bonaparte .

The Reign of Terror was not justified because it abused human rights.‘’Revolutionary Government denied legal counsel to accused enemies which went against human right.‘’In 1793, a revolutionary campaign was launched against the Catholic Church. Sunday worship, christmas, and easter were abolished.’’(Document _A_and C_)This facts proves that they took way people freedom they are not allowed to have any religious holiday. The Revolutionary they have been ended up all religions practice. The Reign of Terror were not justified because they abused the human rights and they did not protect the human rights.

The French Revolution began in 1789 as an attempt, by the revolutionaries, to form a new government that would give the people more liberty, equality and value people’s rights. Between 1793 and 1794 the government used extreme ways to achieve their goals. This period of time, led by Robespierre, was called the reign of Terror because between 20,000-40,000 french people were killed by the government forces. The Reign of Terror was not justified for three reasons:The external and internal threat did not deserve it, they denied natural rights against people who opposed them and the methods of the Terror were too extreme.

The radical turning point of the revolution, marked by the Reign of Terror, was an atmosphere of mass executions and imposed paranoia, with more than ten thousand “counterrevolutionaries” (vaguely defined, which at the end turned out to be anyone with dissent) sent to death under the Law of Suspects. Robespierre himself states that “Terror is nothing but prompt, severe, inflexible justice; it is therefore an emanation of virtue… The government of the revolution is the despotism of liberty against tyranny”. “Severe and inflexible”, as justified by Robespierre, the revolution needed a push in order to reach its goals. France under the committee's total control sent anyone with dissent to the guillotine because they were considered to be a threat to the new government, which ironically named itself “for the people”. An anonymous eyewitness during the reign commented on the Reign of Terror collection of authentic narratives that “It seemed as if their blind fury was particularly directed against the weakest and most amiable.The loveliest, the youngest, and the most interesting females, were dragged in crowds into this receptacle of misery, whence they were led, by dozens, to inundate the scaffold” (325). The sickening extent of human toll

The French Revolutionary wanted all the foreign countries to have the same government as them with no liberty and equality. In June of 1794, it says, “Two thirds of all executions during the Reign of Terror occur in June and July” (Doc A). I think this is when everyone started to die because everyone was being sentenced for saying bad things about the government. Also, in Document B it states, “in August 1792, an 80,000 man army marched into France.” (Doc B) The army consisted of half Austrians and half Prussians. They were going against France because they were frightened that the revolution would spread to their countries. Due to this France declared war and the French army unfortunately won the famous Battle of Valmy. While fighting in war they had three things on their mind which were, “to protect the new government at home; to spread the revolutionary ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity beyond its borders; and to punish the French émigrés. The French émigrés were people, mostly nobles and/or aristocrats who fled during the Revolution between 1789 through 1792. In my opinion, I don’t understand why it was necessary for them to try and overthrow any monarchy that fought with them like they did to the Austrian

The Reign of Terror lasted from September 1793 until Robespierre was executed in 1794. The Reign of Terror’s main purpose was to protect France from foreign enemies and eliminate counterrevolutionaries. People who disagreed with the revolution were executed in town square in front of the town’s people. During the Reign of Terror, about 40,000 people were murdered or executed. Was this method of protecting France from external and internal enemies reasonable? The Reign of Terror was not justified because the external affairs were small, the internal affairs were not serious, and the methods of the Terror were too extreme.

Would you have wanted to be told what to do by a king or queen, or never be able to have have a say in anything? Well I believe a country should have freedom and the power should be in the people's hands not the government. The leader of the French monarchy was Louis XVI. The french revolution began in 1789 shortly after the american revolution. The three words that became the french battle cry was Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.

The “Reign of Terror” was a threat to outside countries, used a guillotine to execute, and had the ideas of full “liberty, equality, and fraternity.” This phase was not justified; thousands of people were killed

The period of the French Revolution was from September 5, 1793, to July 27, 1794. Louis XVI was sentence to death due to crime like unfair tax system and having France be bankrupt. In a 10 month period which suspect enemies in the revolution were guillotined even innocents. Was the Reign of Terror justified? The Reign of Terror was not justified because they were threatened, methods that aren't that necessary, and no evidence of how they

The Reign of Terror was a time in France when King Louis had share his power and French people started to lead a revolution against him. The french people had enough so they decided that it was finally time to lead a revolution. Although thousands of people died in the Reign of Terror, it was justified because they got rid of their leaders, and France became a stronger country.

The Reign of terror, death, war, but most importantly, change. Arising conflicts in France's government and economy were the building blocks of the revolution. King Louis XVI, searching for help with the state of this government, could not control the change that the men he went to looking for help wanted(Background Essay). Mobs where the beginning and then the revolution escalated, leading to what we know today as the Reign of Terror. Some believe it was just unjustified killing

¨If you want peace, you won't get it through violence¨ - John Lennon. It all started on September 5th, 1793 after the committee of Public safety was created to fight “enemies of the revolution”. Others who disagreed countered the revolution, creating a revolt. Because of this the committee of public safety began killing others who disagreed with their government in the form of guillotine. The Reign of Terror was not justified because innocent people died, the revolutionists were hypocritical,and it overall was unnecessary.

King Louis XVI and Marie Antionette were two people that should not have been ruling a country. King Louis was always gone on hunting trips and Marie Antionette spent every dime of French money. Once the Monarchy ran out money, they started to tax the Third, and poorest, estate. The third estate took up 97% of the population. 97% of the population was starving and the royal family kept spending large amounts of money until the people revolted. The people of France tried to reason with King Louis, but he refused to change his ways and kept taxing the third estate. When the people revolted, they stormed the Bastille and took all of the weapons they could. The people then went to the King’s palace and demanded he fix the way he was ruling before they killed him. The King didn’t listen and was executed along with his wife. Of the three kids that Marie Antionette had, the two boys died of Tuberculosis in jail and the daughter was sent to live the remainder of her life in exile in Austria. It may seem as though the people of France had successfully overgrown their monarchy and could begin a life of freedom, however this is not the case. The French had rushed into combat too fast and did not have a plan for what to do after they had killed their rulers. The right of Terror begins where Maximilian Robespierre beheads 40,000 people in the span of ten months for speaking against the revolution. In the end, Robespierre ends up getting

Crowds surrounded the platform which held the guillotine which would soon kill the king of France, King Louis XVI. Blood covered the floor as the kings head slowly rolled off, followed by clapping and cheering. Little did the people know, once Louis XVI was executed, it led to the start of the 18-month period of the French Revolution which later earned the name “The Reign of Terror”. From 1793-1794 The Reign of Terror took place, certainly fulfilling the name given. Led by chief prosecutor named Maximilien Robespierre, this time in France’s history would be filled with blood and guts and a whole lot of inequality. For something to be considered justified, it must be done for, or marked by a good or legitimate reason. The Reign of Terror was

As more peoples blood is split to gain the rights not extended to them, the Terror grows becoming more and more gruesome. The French revolution began in late 1789 to obtain the rights that every citizen in born with. The motto of the French was liberty, equality, or death and the price to be paid for the civil liberties was blood. The revolutionary leader Robespierre and journalist Marat explained the more blood the better so that was what raged the people and started the Reign of Terror. Were the values expressed by the French Revolution necessary though? Even though, the French Revolution saw the Terror as a sign to create peace and restore a new France it was not justified because the extremities of the internal and external threats