Related Literature About Grading System

As a Curriculum Coach, I facilitate professional development for teachers based on the needs of our staff and students. After spending time observing classrooms and meeting with teachers, I realized that we needed to examine our current grading practices. Our current practices focus too much on grading effort and behaviors, and not enough on measuring understanding of specific learning targets. As a result, our students and teachers focus on turning in assignments, instead of learning. If ask why a student is failing, the most common response is “he is not turning in his work”. Teachers are unable to communicate which specific learning targets the students are missing, because the grades are distorted by student behaviors. When making decisions about placement in honors courses, it is difficult to determine which students have the knowledge necessary to move into an advanced course because their grades are clouded by effort and

Within our school there are policies set in place and it is important that staff know the proceedures.

Would you consider yourself as a grade junkie? Do you always strive for an A and take nothing less? In his essay “A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System,” Jerry Farber argues that the grading system is not a good way of evaluating students academically. He believes that with the grading system the way it is, students’ do not try to learn; they only push towards getting a good letter grade. Though some may disagree, Farber's view on the grading system is true.

Through studies conducted by the Society of Higher Education, it has been documented that a teacher can teach up to sixty students successfully. Teachers only need fifteen minutes of quality time to teach a new lesson, the rest of the fifty minutes will be used for calming down the students and answering questions. With this programs, the students will require at least an hour per class for homework outside of school to learn the material dictated in those fifteen minutes of teaching. To help teachers keep better track of their students, a micro chip will be place in the flesh of the back of their neck. This will illuminate the need to take roll, for as the student enters the class their number will be recorded in a new main stream computer system costing a hundred thousand dollars per computer with a total of ten computers. This list will then record the

teachers deposit information in the student and it is to be expected that the student will retain the

Few decades back, educational institutions maintained educational records mainly in paper files. In those days, privacy breaches meant access to information present paper files without proper consent, and the main concern was related to misuse of the student information by agencies rather than the theft of records. To comply with FERPA, educational institutions had to safeguard paper files from illegal access, and provide access to these files only for legitimate use.

In the past, academic and administrative computer systems were isolated, either for security reasons or as a result of limited interconnectivity with other computers. Today, nearly any information that an administrator, teacher, student or parent might is available through a network connection. Course lectures are presented are viewed and students submit their assignments via the internet school class shell. Student and parents can view their grades online, administrative paperwork and other information can be shared through a variety of systems. The internet is an awesome and convenient way to communicate, but it introduces

It might come as a surprise to you that some of the school’s current policies have put students’ education and safety in jeopardy. These flaws come about as a result of missed in-class notes and from the misuse of the key fob system. My solution to these quandaries is to require all teachers to record and upload their lectures to the internet and to replace fobs with a more secure, less inconvenient system.

I hope to resolve the issue of making the grading scale more consistent and easily understood by everyone. The current grading system consists of letter grades, percentages, and symbols that have no corresponding numerical value.Some argue that the grading system is easily understood and helps improve student performance. Others will argue that it has its limits and hard to comprehend. A positive change that I would like to see is improvement in the grading system criteria and making it easier to understand, so that it helps the performance of all students. My opponents argue that the grading scale is difficult to comprehend and has its limits. The opposition would want to resolve this issue because of the criteria and limits they disagree with. Both sides make valid points but, each side can reach a solution that both parties agree to.

The more beneficial way of learning is always the best for parents and kids. Standards based grading is one that is bringing kids and parents down. Standards based grading should be banned from all schools for letter grades, beneficial standards, and most of all, higher and better grade proficiency. A reason for this is that it’s affecting middle, high, and college grades, for when it’s time to move on. Another reason is it takes time to turn over to letter grades from SBG, and teachers don’t actually help you for one’s and two’s. Plus it’s easier to understand Letter Grades-(parents). These are all three reasons why standards based grading should be removed from all schools.

Louisiana State University has decided to adopt a Plus/Minus grading system for the fall semester of 2015. So what does this mean? The current grading system bases grade point averages, or GPAs, on a 4.0 scale with an A worth 4.0 quality points, a B worth 3.0, et cetera. According to the University Registrar’s website, GPAs with the Plus/Minus grading system will now be based on a 4.3 scale with an A+ worth 4.3 quality points, an A worth 4.0, an A- worth 3.7, et cetera. Supporters of the Plus/Minus grading scale believe that it will reduce grade inflation and make LSU more competitive with other national schools that have a system in place like the one LSU is adopting (“A Plus and Minus Grading System for LSU”). However, many students have great concerns about how this policy will be implemented and the repercussions it will have on their GPAs and futures. Overall, the University should have been more thorough conducting its research and considered the negative effects that the Plus/Minus system will have on students and the university as a whole.

Kokomo High School uses a system for keeping records of students’ grades, absences, tardies, and any medical needs or alerts. The

Do students feel that education can take a toll on their life mentally and physically? Sometimes students feel that their diligent work and commitment is insufficient to do well in school. At times students cannot keep up with the standard expectations of education particularly with grades. Grading point averages and grades decides the eventual fate of a student. Education is based upon a positioning arrangement of lettering evaluations that as far as anyone knows shows on the off chance that you are learning and precisely the amount you are learning. Holy Family’s university grading system is unfair and it plays a negative role in the lives of students affecting students’ GPAs and their hope of the future drastically. No student should have to suffer from an unjust grading system that makes students feel less savvy than they really are.

Having the same grading scale at every school throughout the nation would make it fair, academically for all students. Most schools around our school, Kindred High School, follow the grading scale 90-100 is an A, 80-89 is a B, and so on. Our grading scale is 94-100 is an A, 85-93 is a B, and it continues. By changing it, it gives all students a chance for success in high school. Eventually, helping them for success in college.

Many people learn many different ways. I feel that it is better to grade people off of the standard grading scale. We have used it for many decades, so why change it now? Three reasons why we should keep the grading scale the same are everyone is used to tests, quizzes, and worksheets, I feel that people learn better if you do not make them do half of the work at home, and one should not be forced to present a project in the middle of a room full of people.