Relational Dialectical Theoretical Analysis

at times, clashing and conflicting with each other. These clashing traits bring out the role of

Kayla- The morning of April 19, 1775 , Britain’s General Gage would send out squadrons of British soldiers stationed in Boston .

1.) The ending did not surprise me; I think it may have if we hadn’t discussed it in class. I think I would have been very surprised and confused, if I hadn’t known the ending prior to reading it.

zany He threw a finger to the dead end of the corridor, where twenty-someting Jason Abbernathy proceeded with a smile, sliding a homburg over his gelled hair and urbanely clicked his door shut.

“Would it be scarier if I told you that I would kill you or just hurt you really bad?”

My old journal got taken away when I got locked up in this box. All I get is a bible. The bible looks like its been handed out before to others that have passed in this God forsaken rat hole… I can’t keep my sanity much longer. I’m losing it! All I get is a little pea size hole that gives off some light, if that. Most of the time it’s filled with mud. I have come to believe that the mud is from the vehicles moving outside. It splashes up onto the wall. Sometimes worms will inch their way in the hole and that’s the only meal that has any personal delight. The taste of some what warm meal…

The hardest times in friendships are saying goodbye, especially when a friendship is as strong as the friendship that Doug and John have with one another. During chapter 19, Doug has John play statues with him, thinking that time will become slower and his relationship with John will last longer. “’Statues!’ Everyone froze. Very quietly Douglas moved across the lawn where John Huff stood like an iron deer in the twilight” (Bradbury 108-109). In addition, at the end of chapter 19, while John said his last goodbyes to Doug, he made a promise. “’Tom,’ said Douglas, ‘just promise me one thing, okay?’ ‘It’s a promise. What?’ ‘You may be my brother and maybe I hate you sometimes, but stick around, all right?’” (Bradbury 112). At the end of the chapter,

Chapter 8 is devoted to a description of the yellow-spotted lizards. The chapter explains that up to twenty can live in one hole, that they eat the shells of sunflower seeds, and that the yellow spots aren't as obvious as the red around their eyes, their black teeth, or their white tongue. In fact, if you can see the yellow spots at all, you're probably already dead.

Conflict is generally defined by four criteria: expressed tension, interdependence, perceived incompatible goals, and the need for resolution (Wood,

Standards had became an enormous popular thing to create in this generation. Amongst your social media timeline, you witness shared posts by your friends. Many in which are post of selfies, funny memes, or #RelationshipGoals. Relationship goals is a term that has inevitably gone viral, almost destroying relationships. These posts displays a popular couple, where most people envy them. Most ‘relationship’ post’s pertain couples that show off the things they give, or do for their significant others; such as buying an expensive dinner, shoes, jewelry, or even a car. In I Tweet, Therefore I Am written by Peggy Orenstein, she identifies that “we act out a role in every interaction, adapting it based on the nature of the relationship or context at

Drawing on relational dialectic theory, Sahlstein, Maguire, and Timmerman interviewed 50 Army wives whose husbands were either deployed at that time or recently returned to discuss their experiences before, during, and after their husbands’ most recent deployment. Through qualitative analyses of 2000 transcribed pages of data, they identified three contradictions with marriage and deployment; uncertainty-certainty during predeployment, autonomy-connection during the deployment, and openness-closedness during reunion. For the most part, they discovered that during their husbands predeployment they experienced high levels of uncertainty because they did not know what to expect. During their husband’s deployment their levels of uncertainty decreased,

The core concept that stands out of relational dialectics theory is contradiction (Griffin, 2009). A contradiction happens whenever you have two interdependent forces that mutually work against each other (Griffin). This is continually happening in relationships because they are in a constant state of flux. Relationships are constantly changing and there is no complete certainty. Baxter and Montgomery give the example of contradiction as a game of tug-of-war created through interpersonal conversations. Moreover, these theorists believe that contradictions are inevitable and can be used to constructively enhance the quality of relationships (Griffin).

In life, we, as humans, develop a series of relationships with a countless number of people. We develop said relationships through positive or negative experiences that enable to share dialectical tensions. The relational dialectics theory is “…a humanistic theory based on the idea that people are responding to the pulls and tugs that surround them in a relationship” (Baxter 1). The theory is applied to many relationships to see how standardized one’s relationship is and how it fits into these categories. There are three basic types of dialectic tensions that are within relationships.

social system not just an individual. Each frame work plays part in the issue when an economy

Human beings have been developing interpersonal relationships, which are characterized by close interactions between two people or among a group of individuals (Longres, 2000). Research has established that the closest interactions among persons are found within family because they act as the smallest social units across the world. While people develop interpersonal relationships for various purposes, it is difficult to nurture and maintain such interactions. In fact, the desire to relate inter-personally is based on social commitment factors such as mutual love, inference and business relationships, among others (Longres, 2000). Laws, customs and/or mutual accords control associations, but they are founded on platforms of social unions and society. It is worth noting that interpersonal relationships could be exhibited as connections between persons, for example, romantic associations. In addition, persons could establish interactions small or big groups of people. For example, a priest should develop a relationship with his or her congregation so that he or she could spread religious messages effectively. Also, an elected leader establishes an interaction with his or her people for effective representation. Relationships between or among people can be studied to dynamic systems, which can vary in a continuous manner during their existence. However, they are characterized by gradual growth and improvement because people learn more about each other as time progresses, which