Relationship Between China And Pakistan

“China Rising” is a non-arguable fact and the one of the most important subject in the twenty-first century. The rise of China is a relative threat to the neighbor regions or other great powers. Further, some scholars also comment that China either will replace or has already superseded the United State as the world’s only superpower. China’s growth is too rapid and massive that other nations have limited or no opportunity to compete with it. By using international relations theories to analyze US-China relations, there are three main stream theories commonly using to explain this case: Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism. In addition, in the article “The Future of US-China Relations” composed by Aaron L. Friedberg, professor of politics and international affairs, he comments that people predict US-China relations with two different views – optimistic or pessimistic. However, which international relation theory applies this political phenomenon the best is still debatable. This paper will argue that the conflicts between the two nations are normal while China is growing, because the conflicts are derived from different perspectives. Pessimistic realism and optimistic liberalism are two main points that will be addressing when approach to this critical issue. Finally, the main argument in this paper is to show why pessimistic realism will eventually prove to be accurate and true to explain the future of US-China relationships.

The United States and China Relation started since 1784, but it wasn’t until 1970’s when The United States finally recognize the communist people from China. This led us to be influenced by their culture, politics, but the most important economically. The relation of these two countries was not so good at the beginning, since China is a communist country that was involved with many countries that were in war. The interaction of these countries goes back to 1785 when the first Chinese sailors arrived to Baltimore looking for wealth and then it increases in 1847 with the Gold Rush in San Francisco that attracted many Asian Immigrants in look for new opportunities. The U.S. Department of State mentions in their archive United States Relations

Japan and China have been in cold relations ever since the end of World War II. After the war, there was barely any diplomacy to bring together their relation. Not until 1972 Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka of Japan visited China with an official invitation. At the scene, both sides were willing for reconciliation and normalization, result with the Joint Communique between two governments. From that moment on, the (economic) relations of the two nations has been reestablished, encouraged and developed rapidly (China, Japan Joint Communique, 1972). There is an opinion that China’s incredible (economic) developing rate has greatly influenced Japan diplomatic with Beijing since that time. And this essay is going to support this argument with data as well as historical and contemporary context. First, energy requirement is usually critical to the development and modernization of China and the stabilization of Japan. Therefore, variables that related to it can influence both countries’ economic interest, lead to the consideration of policy makers. It is clear that both countries were in need of developing their gas and oil fields. Second, Japanese engagement into China market have changed a lot - Japanese companies and corporations were having decreasing influence on the economy of the client country - led to the need of adjusting investment policies within the government body. Third, China is modernizing and in many ways will be able to surpass Japan in near future. Therefore

Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to propose a course of action to counter the PRC’s aggressive influence within the SCS specifically regarding the ongoing territorial disputes.

In the book “on China” the author examines the main episodes in China foreign policy with the United States from classical day to modern day. Kissinger argues that, the American policies toward China are one, setting in the motion about the normalizations of relations with the citizen of China. Two, new diplomatic and negotiations should start in order to extend further arms and control powers. Three, engagement policy. This will be a shifting focus of America administrators alternating between the realism and liberation. Four, Cautious engagement with China. This will ensure there will be no military expansion of China. Since cooperation with China would encourage China to become Benign. It will also become a helpful partner in terms of security and political issues. Last policy was adopting G-2 to solve foreign affairs issues.

Australia and Japan expressed their interest in signing a defence technology cooperation agreement after Japanese Prime Minister Abe and Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott ’s meeting during Abe’s visit to Australia in July (Prime Minister of Australia 2014). This is surprising for the international society as the Japanese constitution did not allow Japan to export its military technologies until the Japanese government’s recent change to Article 9 (Nye 2014). Even though the agreement is not signed yet, this news had attracted many attention from around the globe. There are various kinds of explanations and analyzations on why this two states would choose to release such information at this time. The argument for this essay would be that the defence technology cooperation agreement may be one of the many policies that aims on making Japan a normal country, in response in the rising power of China and the threats from Korea, so that it can play a better role in balancing regional security. This essay will try to prove this argument by briefly introducing why Japan is not a normal country within the international society and Prime Minister Abe’s recent efforts to change this situation, how a defence technology cooperation agreement between Australia and Japan can play a critical role on this matter, why Japan and Australia are considering choose to sign such agreement with each other, and the incentives for Australia to support Japan’s goal of strengthening its military

To realize the ultimate benefits and progress from such bilateral relationships, it is important to ensure the two countries are free from strategic rivalry. There should be healthy and fair competition. They should put equal priorities for both the countries and provide strong management team to solve disagreements and differences between the two countries. Although this is somewhat seen today through ambassadors and other high political figures (many businessmen), it would be better if it were taken to a new, higher level.

International relations have been one of the most interesting and at the same time controversial areas of study since the Cold War. The world silent conflagration determined a reconsideration of the way in which politics was conducted and the relations between states at the level of the balance of power and the importance of international actors.

This article is about the experience that women in China face when searching for their husband, due to the fact of their pursuit of money and material goods that come with their future husband.

It is undeniable that the mutual animosity between the United States of America (USA) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) played a significant role in characterising international relations during the latter half of the 20th Century. On the other hand, it appears that the economic and political interactions between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the USA will characterise international relations in the 21st Century. As a result, this essay asserts that the claim of a Sino-American ‘Cold War’ is true to a limited extent; as there has been hostility between the PRC and the USA in the past. However, to a much larger extent, Sino-American relations in the early 21st Century are significantly better than Russo-American relations in the mid-20th Century, thus countering the claim of a Sino-American Cold War significantly. To develop this claim, this essay will analyse a number of factors. First, this essay explores the ideological, political and economic facets of Russo-American relations in the Cold War’s earlier stages (1945 - 70). This will be done as to establish the nature of relations between the superpowers. Conversely, this essay will then analyse the ideological, political and economic facets of Sino-American relations during the early 21st Century (2000 - 16) as to establish a framework for comparison. Ultimately, this essay aims to affirm the claim that Sino-American relations are significantly better than Russo-American relations whilst

From an international relations perspective, the Taiwan Strait, one of the most likely conflict zones in the Asia-Pacific region, has been dubbed the “Balkan Peninsula of the East.” The status of Taiwan has been one of the most intricate issues in international relations arena for the past decades. The Taiwan question is essentially an extension of the “two Chinas” problem, which creates a dilemma for accommodating

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has become more integrated and willing to cooperate within the global political and economic systems than ever in its history. However, there is growing apprehension in the Asia-Pacific region and the U.S. in regards to the consequences of rising in economic and military power in China. Descriptions about Chinese diplomacy in the policy and scholarly are less positive lately concerning China’s obedience to regional and international rules. There was little debate in the U.S. and elsewhere in regards to whether China was or was not part “the international community.” Scholars and experts in the early 1990s have contended

From an international relations perspective, the Taiwan Strait, one of the most likely conflict zones in the Asia-Pacific region, has been dubbed the “Balkan Peninsula of the East.” The status of Taiwan has been one of the most intricate issues in international relations arena for the past decades. The Taiwan question is essentially an extension of the “two Chinas” problem, which creates a dilemma for accommodating the existence of Taiwan under the vague concept of the one-China policy (Hsieh, P., 2009). The Taiwan issue has been regarded as the most sensitive question between China and the United States. Although China-U.S. relations have made significant progress, the Taiwan issue concerns Chinese and American decision makers for many years.

The goal of studying international politics is to create generalizable conclusions about the relationships at the international level. That is, there is a scientific method used to understand how the world works. The three main methods for understanding how the world works are realism, liberalism, and constructivism. The purpose of this paper is to explain the components of the main theories and apply them to the relationship between Taiwan and China, and the likelihood, or lack thereof, of another great power war. The dispute arose from the Chinese nationalists fleeing to the island of Taiwan after Mao Zedong and his communist revolution took over mainland China. The conflict here is whether or not the independence of Taiwan will be recognized or the People’s Republic of China will seek to invade Taiwan and assert its dominance over it, thus creating a possibility of war with the United States. Liberalism is the best theory in international relations because it best explains the situation in Taiwan and presents the best generalizable conclusion for how the relationships between states work.

When international relations between the world’s economic superpowers are mentioned, the first political/economic bonds that come to ones head are usually the US and Japan and now more often the US and the EU relationships. The world influence that comes from these two bonds is substantial, but there is a third relationship that I believe forms a triangle of political/economic power that stabilizes world politics. Ties between Japan and Europe have been considered relatively weak compared to those between Japan and the US or the US and Europe, but the policy initiatives arising from a joint declaration are helping to improve the balance of relations between these three partners.