Relationship Between Credibility And Peer Review

What are some of the things that determine whether a source is creditable? First is relevance; Ms. White’s article was written in February of 2015 (White). All of the studies she used were published in 2015, making them very current. When it comes to economic discussions, this is crucial, as economics can quickly change.

The author of my article is credible. Honor Whiteman. She has written many other medical issues for regular people to high class doctors that are trying to learn about something new. I know this is true because that information came out of a google result. Another way my article is credible is the purpose of the article. At the bottom of the article there was a little tiny thing that said it was approved by doctors so that means doctors use that information and what is the point of making a an entire fake article and have actual doctors use it. There is no

A peer review is a process of subjecting research methods and findings to the study of others who are experts in the same field. The purpose is designed to prevent dissemination of irrelevant findings, unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations, and personal views. It relies on colleagues that review one another’s work and make an informed decision about whether it is legitimate, and adds to the large dialogue or findings in the field.

While the methodology of the research seemed solid, there were factors which were out of the control of the researchers which made the process more difficult to verify. Because the researchers chose a public web forum, they were unable to verify the legitimacy

For example, a Dentist could not write a research article on the best delivery method for babies because that is not their specialty. Therefore, good indicators of credibility would consist of evidence that the article has been peer-reviewed by other scholars in a similar field and the writer’s credentials.2 The “A” stands for accuracy, which focuses on ensuring that the information that is presented is not only up to date but also exact, detailed and comprehensive.2 Science is an ever changing field and research studies that might have been conducted 20 years ago may not be true today because of the technical advances. Therefore, it is essential that when dealing with accuracy certain indicators need to be considered such as the timeliness of the information, is the information presented in an un-bias approach and is the information

The importance of relying on scholarly - peer reviewed - articles and journals become clearer with each passing day; it is difficult to discern fact from fiction.

1. There was no author or writer details provided to even begin deciphering the credibility of the source. Since there is only one source provided, it obviously is the most credible. The credibility doesn’t come from being able to pick between multiple sources, but only because it’s the only one provided.

In Morgan Jerkins article the reader may feel as if she lacked credibility because she had quotes and facts to support what she was saying, but she never cited the sources or mentioned where she got them from. Because of this I feel as if she missed an opportunity to establish credibility. A good example would be “While black men only make up six percent of the American population, they comprise a staggering seventy percent of NFL rosters. However, their power is mainly found on the field, since there are currently no African-Americans who are a majority owner of any team and no African-American CEOs or Presidents. The majority of NFL players are black, while the NFL fan base is 83 percent white and 64 percent

Credibility has two main components which are trustworthiness and expertise, which both have objective and subjective components. Trustworthiness is based more on subjective factors, but can include objective measurements such as established reliability. An example of credibility is Dr. Gregory Curtis Steinbach who started getting his credits when he attended University of California, San Diego in 1984. In which he received a B.S, M.S, PhD in Bioengineering. After receiving his credentials he began working in 1990 at UCSD Medical Center where he worked as a Research & Development Engineer for about 13 years.

Source credibility is a specific concept that helps us understand where meanings come from. The source, meaning the speaker in this case has to be believable for the listeners to get the message that is being given. “The three dimensions of source credibility are competence, trustworthiness, and caring/goodwill” (Wrench, McCroskey, & Richmond, 2008, pg. 32). It the speaker is not competent, trustworthy, or caring then the audience is not going to listen effectively which

The work chosen for the research needed to be identified as credible. According to The OWL at Purdue writing lab some standards for assessing accuracy and credibility include “if the material was written by an author credible in their field of study”, “if the purpose of the paper is non objective”, “if the material was peer-reviewed”, and “who is the intended audience for the research”

Assessment of the Text’s Credibility - Write a paragraph addressing all of the questions on the Assessing Sources Handout: The text has credibility. The publisher is writing for National Review, a reliable organization. National Review in a non profitable organization, that focuses on distributing information and news. The text was first published on December 21, 2015. The information is quite current because this article was published three months ago. The publishing date relates to the history of the topic because technology is always evolving and advancing, hence, the most current articles are the most reliable. The author has the qualifications to write this article because it is one of the world’s most trusted organizations. This article was not written by one individual who might have biased opinion toward the topic. This article was written by an organization which makes it very reliable and credible.

3. Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work. It constitutes a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards of quality, improve performance, and provide credibility.

When researchers begin looking online for sources it can become tiresome looking through countless web pages to find a credible source. On Global Post.com an article, “Why is Credibility of Online Sources Important in Education?” written by Kori Morgan said, “One problem of authorship on the Internet is that anyone with the skills and equipment can publish a website. Although a resource may have good information, it may be published by someone without qualifications, experience and education.” This quote by Morgan is a great explanation of why online sources can become trouble for people’s research. Without knowing the proper techniques for reviewing websites this can be fatal for the author’s paper. Starting with the least credible website,

Credibility: I am a credible source for this topic through all of the research I have found.