Relationship Connection, Harvey And Pauwels: An Analysis

Love in terms of a relationship can be described as an experience between two people sharing mutual feelings, understandings and the enjoyment of being with one another. What love is varies from person to person; Psychologist Robert Sternberg came up with the triangular theory of love stating there are three main components for any love relationships. Another psychologist Elaine Hatfield suggests that there are two basic types of love for relationships. On the other hand, an anthropologist Helen Fisher explains that love is a primarily a human-mating motivational drive, rather than an emotion (Fisher, H. 2004). With these three theories of love, this essay looks at the different ways of how love can or cannot survive in a love relationship.

The second major psychological perspective is that of learning. The perspective of learning is “concerned with how the environment and experience affect a person’s actions” (Wade and Tavris, 2011). When applied to a relationship standpoint many factors come into play. As a child who was raised to respect women, my mom always encouraged me to have healthy long-term relationships and not be a “player”. This lead to me implementing those ideas into my life and sticking with

In a developmental perspective of relational dynamics, communications researcher Mark Knapp, developed a model of relation stages. In Knapp’s model, he included 10 stages, within 2 broad phases, “coming together” at the beginning of the relationship and “coming apart” at the end. The first phases encompasses the first 5 stages, the last phase includes the last 5. However, other researchers have suggested that a third phase, “relational maintenance,” should be included. This stage encompasses the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh stages. These ten stages are as follows.

Hazan and Shaver (1987) proposed the theory that ”Romantic love is an attachment process.” (Hazan & Shaver, 1987), which the individual will experience differently depending on the attachment history that has been formed by the internal working models based on the social interaction with caretaker as an infant. According to Bowlby, these internal working models are essential for attachment patterns throughout life from childhood till adult love relationships (Fraley, 2010).

Another myth about romantic is that a true soul mate ought to recognize what the partner is thinking or feeling without being told. Trust and disclosure go together in a romantic relationship progression. Specifically, the dialectical theory proposes that in the beginning of relationships, disclosure is vital as it is an indication of trust and affection in the relationship. The revelation of intimate details shows that a couple is going into a deeper relationship level (Click et al. 131). The myth that mind reading is required in love causes the assumption that partners ought not explain their rational assumptions or expectations since the other partner can read what they are thinking.

A Ted Talk by Esther Perel focuses on the secret to desire in a long-term relationship. Many parts in her talk relate to concepts we have discussed in class. In the talk and in class it is explained that your relationship style or attachment starts young and continues into your adult life and sex life. Focusing on desire, Esther explains that romanticism and caretaking can be similar,

Mindfulness meditation practices can produce just that kind of interaction. Although many of us do not start from a place of being able to affectively build secure attachment, it is possible to change that with the integration of a mindfulness practice (Shaver et. al., 2007). The two most common attachment insecurities are “attachment anxiety” and “avoidant attachment” (Shaver et. al. 2007, page 265). Attachment anxiety can be described as a fear of rejection and a strong need for approval while avoidant attachment is an uncomfortable feeling with closeness and a preference for emotional distance (Shaver et. al., 2007). Both of these attachment insecurities may cause relationship and individual issues in conflict. On the other hand, a more secure attachment may be gained by the practice of mindfulness meditation and therefore provide more effective responses to conflict, an increase in support for one another and more outward displays of affection (Shaver et. al,

Sociological perspectives explains love relationships as not perfect but a working progress. A commitment which relies on continuous maintenance and reassurance. Love relationship practices and investments are configured in experiences that will be shared in the past, present and in the future.

Why do we form relationships? In chapter 8 we find out that in relationships one aspect can be related to the appearance of someone. As well how proximity to an individual can have a great impact on the way a relationship will develop. One must also take into consideration how one's similarities will make a relationship stronger and last longer. It also goes to how one may eventually terminate a relationship that is no longer working.

In 1991, Stafford and Canary used equity theory to explain the idea of their typology of relational maintenance strategies. They hypothesized that couples in equitable relationships use more relational maintenance behaviors and the uses of these behaviors affect the couples’ satisfaction (Dainton, M., 2000; Canary, D, J., & Stafford, L., 1992). Stafford and Canary ask people about what “interactional behaviors” they use with their partner to have a successful relationship (Weige, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S., 1999). A factor analysis found a “correlation between the use of their five strategies [relational maintenance behaviors which are positivity, openness, assurances, networks, and sharing tasks] and [relationship] satisfaction” (as cited

What makes connections fruitful? What sort of procedure do we experience to make a personal relationship? What are a percentage of the issues we experience amid them and in what manner would it be a good idea for us to go about illuminating those issues? The inquiries above are a portion of the subjects I am going to handle in this paper. Connections can be exceptionally compensating if the great exceeds the awful. The achievement in a cozy relationship depends very upon compelling correspondence. There is not just one particular path for couples to convey, in light of the fact that every relationship is distinctive. It is critical to know great types of correspondence to enhance the quality our connections.

Partners in healthy relationships focus on setting personal boundaries that protect the sense of personal identity and help ease feeling distressed by the demands of others. To love someone does not equal enjoying the same activities or agreeing on every decision; respecting the differences that exist between partners creates a harmonious relationship. Take a couple that been dating for two years; Partner A in the relationship enjoys watching horror movies but partner B has a phobia of horror movies even so they always watch horror movies when going out on dates. This recurrence of horror movie dates is caused by Partner B withholding information about their phobia; moreover, partner B has grown resentful. This causes the people to have troubles in their relationship that eventually could lead to a breakup. To prevent a breakup from occurring, partner B must inform partner A of their affliction towards horror movies; this will lead to the couple reevaluating their d=lifestle and allow them to move forward and create a date night that they both express interest in. A peaceful relationship is not one that is free of conflict; it is one where partners address conflict effectively. Therefore, equal efforts between attending to oneself and making the relationship work are necessary for a lasting

Relationship Awareness gives people the mindfulness and ability they need to fabricate more effective individual and expert relationships

The perception of selfishness and being uninterested could cause the other partner to act in similar ways to the seemingly uninterested partner. In addition, when a partner fails to express romance to the other, “it becomes a challenge to take the other person’s perspective” (site). Obviously, failing to take the other partner’s perspective is likely to result in more arguments because one individual will not think of how the other could be affected. An increase in arguing is likely to irritate both partners greatly. Therefore, failing to communicate romance can make one partner seem uncaring which could lead to an increase in fighting; while resulting in a less satisfying relationship for each partner (site). However, this is far from the only way lacking romantic expression to a partner can degrade a

In order to best understand the role of commitment within already established romantic relationships, it’s necessary to look at the various theories concerning topics of commitment. First and foremost, the work of Lemieux and Hale analyze Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love, which serves as a strong foundation for understanding the role of commitment within a romantic relationship. The aforementioned theory states that love is composed of three parts: intimacy, passion, and commitment. According to the studies pertaining to this theory, each of the three components change in prevalence throughout the course of a relationship.