preview

Religion In Hamlet Research Paper

Decent Essays
Open Document

How do the characters in Hamlet use religion in their decision making process to mask their inner immoral desires? In the era Shakespeare depicted his play Hamlet in, religion was synonymous with everyone, especially in royal families. Although everyone was believed to be predominantly catholic, whether or not they acted according to their preconceived morals was questionable. Shakespeare attempts to comment on the disconnect between the devotion to God in the Danish royal family and how they act against their religious structure. Shakespeare concluded that although the characters in Hamlet consider religion in their decision making process, often they use feigned devotion to hypocritically mask their inner immoral desires and actions.
Hamlet …show more content…

After the calamity of the play, Claudius takes his moment of solitude to evaluate his situation; as he contemplates his fate he proclaims “...since I am still possessed, Of those effects for which I did the murder: My crown, mine own ambition, and my queen. May one be pardoned and retain th’ offense? oft ‘tis seen the wicked prize itself, Buys out the law. But ‘tis not so above. There is no shuffling.” (III.iii.57-65) He comes to terms with the fact that he has sinned, and from the play, he believes others know about it. With his acceptance of his actions, he ponders his consequences, noting that while he may be able to skirt past the law by ‘Buy[ing] out the law’ with ‘the wicked prize itself’, he cannot budge the law of Heaven because ‘tis not so above. There is no shuffling’. He displays that he is sorry for his actions, and wishes to purge himself of this guilt, but he loves what his sin has brought him: Gertrude, his kingship, his fulfillment of ambition. He knows he cannot truly repent his actions and keep his benefits which shows his struggle between selfish desire and religious obligation, wherein desire has obviously triumphed. He ends his soliloquy no better off than he started, but by struggling to pray, which again shows how he’s not strongly obligated by God or to do the morally right thing. Claudius’s pitiful attempt to …show more content…

In a fit of rage, Laertes declares that all friendly ties between he and Claudius are severed due to Laertes believing that Claudius murdered his father: “ To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit!… I stand, that both the worlds I give to negligence, only I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father” (Iv.iv.149-154). Laertes contradicts his morality first when he storms the castle ready to kill Claudius without confirmation that he actually murdered his father. Secondly, when Laertes swears all connections between he and Claudius to hell, stating that he is unafraid if his actions will warrant him eternal damnation of his soul. Laertes displays how one may catch themselves acting immorally but decide to continue out of stronger obligation to personal desire than moral obligations to God. He even goes to the extreme to note that he disregards all of what happens in ‘both worlds’ meaning life and death and that nothing else matters to him but avenging his father's death. His rash vow shows that he is not avenging his father because it is morally right, rather he knows that it is morally wrong but he still decides to do it because his thirst for revenge takes precedence over his obligation to his

Get Access