How do the characters in Hamlet use religion in their decision making process to mask their inner immoral desires? In the era Shakespeare depicted his play Hamlet in, religion was synonymous with everyone, especially in royal families. Although everyone was believed to be predominantly catholic, whether or not they acted according to their preconceived morals was questionable. Shakespeare attempts to comment on the disconnect between the devotion to God in the Danish royal family and how they act against their religious structure. Shakespeare concluded that although the characters in Hamlet consider religion in their decision making process, often they use feigned devotion to hypocritically mask their inner immoral desires and actions.
Hamlet
…show more content…
After the calamity of the play, Claudius takes his moment of solitude to evaluate his situation; as he contemplates his fate he proclaims “...since I am still possessed, Of those effects for which I did the murder: My crown, mine own ambition, and my queen. May one be pardoned and retain th’ offense? oft ‘tis seen the wicked prize itself, Buys out the law. But ‘tis not so above. There is no shuffling.” (III.iii.57-65) He comes to terms with the fact that he has sinned, and from the play, he believes others know about it. With his acceptance of his actions, he ponders his consequences, noting that while he may be able to skirt past the law by ‘Buy[ing] out the law’ with ‘the wicked prize itself’, he cannot budge the law of Heaven because ‘tis not so above. There is no shuffling’. He displays that he is sorry for his actions, and wishes to purge himself of this guilt, but he loves what his sin has brought him: Gertrude, his kingship, his fulfillment of ambition. He knows he cannot truly repent his actions and keep his benefits which shows his struggle between selfish desire and religious obligation, wherein desire has obviously triumphed. He ends his soliloquy no better off than he started, but by struggling to pray, which again shows how he’s not strongly obligated by God or to do the morally right thing. Claudius’s pitiful attempt to …show more content…
In a fit of rage, Laertes declares that all friendly ties between he and Claudius are severed due to Laertes believing that Claudius murdered his father: “ To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit!… I stand, that both the worlds I give to negligence, only I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father” (Iv.iv.149-154). Laertes contradicts his morality first when he storms the castle ready to kill Claudius without confirmation that he actually murdered his father. Secondly, when Laertes swears all connections between he and Claudius to hell, stating that he is unafraid if his actions will warrant him eternal damnation of his soul. Laertes displays how one may catch themselves acting immorally but decide to continue out of stronger obligation to personal desire than moral obligations to God. He even goes to the extreme to note that he disregards all of what happens in ‘both worlds’ meaning life and death and that nothing else matters to him but avenging his father's death. His rash vow shows that he is not avenging his father because it is morally right, rather he knows that it is morally wrong but he still decides to do it because his thirst for revenge takes precedence over his obligation to his
This action taken by Shakespeare affects the attitude the audience may have towards either Catholics or Protestants at the time by creating a mutual understanding of the religions. In doing so, Hamlet does not create disagreements and succeeds in meeting the rules of the Queen, for it is not a religion-oriented play.
In Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, the characters of Laertes and Hamlet both display impulsive reactions when angered. Once Laertes discovers his father has been murdered, he immediately assumes the slayer is Claudius. As a result of Laertes' speculation, he instinctively moves to avenge Polonius' death. "To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation: to this point I stand, that both worlds I give to negligence, let come what comes; only I'll be revenged most thoroughly for my father." Act 4 Scene 5 lines 128-134 provide insight into Laertes' mind, displaying his desire for revenge at any cost.
Levy said Hamlet’s “thought is not merely the operation or manifestation of his intrinsic nature, but the progressive creation of it. In the classical view, man thinks in virtue of his nature as a rational animal. Thought does not make his identity, but instead is the consequence of it.” (para 28) His cowardliness might come from the fear of having to murder someone making him commit a sin sending him into damnation. Religion is a part of his need to get his father out of the predicament he is by revenging his death, but also Hamlet’s “wisdom” of knowing by revenging his father in return he will be sending himself into his own hell. In the soliloquy “what is a man” asks the question “why yet I live to say “This thing’s to do,” sith I have cause and will and strength and means to do ’t. Examples gross as earth exhort me.” (4.4.44-46) Hamlet wonders why with all the days passing by, he is still alive to say Claudius is alive and well. Hamlet has all the motivation needed for one to commit a murder his dear beloved father was poisoned and taken from his reign and family. As everything he knows to be true, he knows he must murder the person responsible for the hideous
In 1600 Europe had abandoned the ideas and teachings of Catholic Christianity and began having a Protestant view on the world. When Protestants changed their worldview they rejected the idea of purgatory, causing a key foundation of their new religion. The Protestant Worldview and reaction of it can be reflected in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet. In this time of religious and spiritual changes many people are very confused which can be closely related to Prince Hamlet’s immense amount of anxiety and “madness” that causes tension, due to the lack of knowledge and the ghost of his father.
asks Reynaldo to defame his son. He is more obsessed with his image and fame than his son’s. Once Polonius was murdered, Laertes still wanted to avenge his fathers death, which shows this relationship was only one-sided.
On the other hand, Laertes wants to revenge his father’s death. Therefore this mistake murder leads Hamlet to his downfall as Claudius and Laertes want to kill him.
Hamlet lets his religion somewhat get in the way when he gets his first chance to kill Claudius. “A villain kills my father, and for that I, his sole son, do this villain send to heaven,” (III. iii. 76- 79). Here is when hamlet decides to wait because Claudius is kneeled down praying. He did not want to kill him because his soul would go to heaven because he has just repented. “When he is drunk asleep, or in his rage, or in th’ incestuous pleasure of his bed, at game a- swearing, or about some act that has no relish of salvation in’t- then trip him, that his heels may kick at heaven, and that his soul may be as damn’d and black as hell, whereto it goes” (III. iii. 89- 92). Hamlet wanted to get Claudius good a sinful like he did his father. He wanted him to go to hell. Here is when you see a different side of hamlet that may seem a bit devious, but when he changes his mind he seems to go back to his original character.
”Thus conscience does not make cowards of us all;/ And thus the native hue of resolution/ Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought;/ And enterprises of great pith and moment,/ With this regard, their currents turn away,/ And lose the name of action.” Hamlet here combines some themes of this play: death and life, the connection between thought and action. In act five scene five, he goes into Claudius’ room to kill him. Like the last time he went to kill him, he was on his knees praying. Why send him to Heaven when he should go to Hell? His father wasn’t given a chance to repent his sins before he was murdered, so why should King Claudius? Hamlet thinks about this for a minute, and decides to wait for a more reasonable
Hamlet concerns about his actions and of the characters around him to be moral to ensure everyone is on the path of morality. During his depression, Hamlet thinks of suicide, but constraints himself," Or that the Everlasting had not fixed His canon 'gainst self-slaughter! ", where Hamlet shows his concern of suicide being a crime in the books of God (I,ii,131 - 132). In his perception, there is more to life than just moments of sadness, and there is no clue of what happens next in one's life so ending life is not an option for him. Hamlet's perception is based on the ideology of right and wrong in the society. Later in the play, witnessing his own mother's second marriage to his uncle, Hamlet overwhelms," O most wicked speed, to post With such dexterity to incestuous sheets! It is not nor it cannot come to good ", where his concerns for his mother's actions are apparent (I,ii,157 - 159). Hamlet distinguishes his mother's act as disgusting and wicked. Such reaction of Hamlet suggests his concern of morality within other characters' actions for the welfare of the society. Finally, upon knowing of his father's murderer, Hamlet still wants to confirm Claudius's guilt in the crime. To investigate of his guilt, Hamlet devises a plan of a play in which he will show Claudius the murder scene," Observe mine uncle. If his occulted guilt Do not itself unkennel in one speech, It is a damnèd ghost that we have
Laertes does not think about his actions or reason through them as Hamlet does, but reacts indecisively and quickly to his father’s death with no concern for the results. For instance, when Laertes finds out about his father’s death, when he barges into the castle Elsinore, and demands to see the king, when Claudius convinces Laertes that he did not kill Polonius, answering Claudius’ question whether Laertes would kill even a friend to avenge his father, Laertes answers, “None but his enemies.” (IV, v, 165) The fact that Laertes would kill his own friend to avenge his father shows that he does not care for the consequences that would follow murdering your friend. He is hot headed and does not stop to think, so he does not realize he is being manipulated. Another instance, following the discussion between Claudius and Laertes aforementioned, Claudius starts to flatter Laertes into killing Hamlet for him, as Claudius questions Laertes commitment to avenging his father, Laertes declares, “ To cut his throat i’ th’ church.” (IV, vii, 144) Laertes confesses with this line that he does not believe in the consequences of the after life. He has no regards for the eternal condemnation that taking a life results in.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a tragic play about murder, betrayal, revenge, madness, and moral corruption. It touches upon philosophical ideas such as existentialism and relativism. Prince Hamlet frequently questions the meaning of life and the degrading of morals as he agonizes over his father’s murder, his mother’s incestuous infidelity, and what he should or shouldn’t do about it. At first, he is just depressed; still mourning the loss of his father as his mother marries his uncle. After he learns about the treachery of his uncle and the adultery of his mother, his already negative countenance declines further. He struggles with the task of killing Claudius, feeling burdened about having been asked to find a solution to a situation that was
The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, is one of the most famous tragedies William Shakespeare has ever written. Found throughout Shakespeare’s tragedy are many religious references. According to Peter Milward, the author of Shakespeare's Christianity: The Protestant and Catholic Poetics of Julius Caesar, Macbeth, and Hamlet, “From a purely religious point of view, which is more than just biblical, Hamlet is rich in homiletic material of all kinds, reflecting almost every aspect of the religious situation in a deeply religious age” (Milward 9). These pieces of religious literature are crucial to the plot of Hamlet. The religious elements found in this tragedy provide the plot, allusions, and foreshadowing.
Religion in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, is questioned directly throughout the play whereas Blake’s poetry indirectly queries religion and implies that it’s God that will lead your soul to a happier life. This is evident in Blake’s poetry as he portrays God as a helpful being but makes the audience contemplate the negative connotations around his religious imagery; such as the angel in The Chimney Sweeper (henceforth referenced as SOI) can be portrayed as an oppressive agent because he is ordering Tom to do an undesirable job. This connects to the fact Blake disapproved of the Enlightenment, where he favored personal rather than institutional religious experience, so his religious views were considered unorthodox. Shakespeare’s Hamlet was written to illustrate fundamental problems of the Renaissance because the dominant religion fragmented from Catholic to Protestant. The changing attitudes and confusion led to people questioning religion which is highlighted throughout play.
Hamlet does not only value his own morality, but also the morality of others. Besides worrying about his own morality, his mother's morality has much significance to him. As Robert Luyster states, "Hamlet would have Gertrude, like himself, become purified, but this can only be done through the acceding to consciousness' claim to be hard"(Luyster 77). Hamlet contemplates his every action. This problem eventually overwhelms him while also causing his madness. The depth of his thought concerning the murder of Claudius following Hamlet's play reveals his madness. "Reason and action are not opposed in Hamlet, but for most of the play, they fail to coalesce as either we or the characters would like them to" (Kastan 48).
Laertes meanwhile, had initially been a very noble youth, who is had presumeably been an honourable figure throughout most of the play. However, when his father is murdered, as he tries to seek revenge for honour, he instead becomes an instrument for Claudius evil plot. Thus, he becomes engaged in the immoral schemes of Claudius, and even though he does admit that such doings are against my conscience, he still conspires to end Hamlets life in a dishonest manner. Thus, as a result of his lapse in judgement, he, like the other villains in the play, is condemned to death. However, before his death, he is redeemed when he admits that he had been justly killed with my own treachery. Thus, in this case, his underlying integrity, in the end, is able to free him from heavens judgement, and a more honourable death is restored to him, as compared to the previously mentioned villains. Had Laertes taken his fathers advise and been true to oneself, he may have gained a more rewarding end. Thus, we are again able to