Religion Is Detrimental On The Progress Of Humanity

Assess the view that religion is a major source of instability and conflict in society today

The accomplishments and success of civilizations are closely linked to their religious outlook and the role of religion in their governments and society. Throughout history rulers have used the influence of religions to control their populations and provide the justification for their power. A society with a greater degree of separation between religion and government promotes a superior level of liberty and creativity amongst its people. By the time of the decline of the Roman Empire in the west, however, the world had come full circle to a return to theocratic dictatorship.

Outline and explain two ways in which religion may be seen as less important in today's society.

Throughout civilization, religions have come a long way in impacting modern society and civilization. One of the major Abrahamic religions, Islam, has made many advances and has contributed a variety of concepts, ideas and inventions to western civilization. Most of these contributions have gone unnoticed throughout the years, and have been credited by various people, when in reality Muslim scholars have formulated these concepts. Although some may believe that these contributions are irrelevant, the reality is that most of the everyday concepts humans use all around the world, have been derived from a primarily Islamic school of thought.

There is a conflict in the village between the chief and Nathan because of the missionary that Nathan wants to bring Christianity to Congo where Congolese already have their own God.

I agree with you that churches/religious beliefs can be considered a social problem. I like that you pointed out how religious social problems can be analyzed on a micro and macro level. People have their own thoughts and beliefs within a religion and different religions have different thoughts and beliefs as a whole. I also like that you pointed out that mental institutions can be considered a social problem. I did not know that two major mental health institutions were recently shut down and I see where this could be considered a huge problem. People who are in need of mental health care are being put back into society because of the lack of funding, which could put others and the people in need of mental health care at risk. Furthermore,

It should be undisputed that religion is very much intertwined with the construction of our world. Both Peter Berger and Emile Durkheim consider similar ideas about the role of religion in the construction in our world. However, both approach the sociological study of religion from two different viewpoints: functionalist and substantive. Berger adopts the functionalist stance, which much more scientific than the substantive stance, which Durkheim chooses to adopt. The functionalist study of religion focuses more on the “quantity” of religion, i.e. an individual’s experience of religion, or religion’s impact on that individual. Functionalists also believe that there is a clear demarcation between what is sacred and what is “profane.” Meanwhile, Durkheim adopted the more sociological substantive stance towards religion, which studies the community and collective effect that religion brings about.

Religion sacralizes the norm and values of establishing society, maintaining the dominance of group goals over individual wishes, and of group disciplines over individual’s impulses. It thereby reinforces the legitimation of the division of functions, facilities, and rewards characteristic of a given society (Thomas, Janet O’Dea, 1995). It helps to come together as one to have one belief. Our lord and savior is who we believe that is good in our life and that’s why we believe to meet up on 7th day of sabbath as a group and praise him and thank hims for giving his life for our sin. People may feel overwhelm on how each person praise for him but we see it as a thank you to him no matter how we do it. A lot of people feel that reinforcing little

It`s a known fact that in order to keep peace with friends and strangers that one should never talk about the following,religion and politics. For good reason to, because still to this day a person can be killed. Simply for not believing what their country feels they ought to. Truthfully politics can be saved for personal reflection, for it`s the utmost importance to decide in the 21st century ,whether or not a person can possibly be good without the religious figure God.

Religion and violence are two different word, and both have different definitions. Religion is defined as a belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or Gods. In fact, violence is a behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something. When putting religion and violence together these definitions turn into a new significance to both word. “Religious violence turns to be a term that covers phenomena where religion is either the subject or object of violent behavior. Religious violence is, specifically, violence that is motivated by or in reaction to religious precepts, texts, or doctrines. This includes violence against religious institutions, people, objects, or when

Throughout History, and even Human Sciences in the area of Politics, we have seen that people who act on their own beliefs are often criticized due to not being able to see both sides of the belief spectrum. Belief is something that needs to be approached with an open mind and, in some cases, needs the ability to be altered. There are quite a few different viewpoints on many different situations, and if one doesn’t have the courtesy to hear about

In fact, any religion are more or less have some violent tendencies such as the Christian Crusades, ah, just because the bourgeoisie established a dominant position in Europe the rights of religious restrictions are tight, plus the religion itself also had a reform, as it is not so prominent. But if you kill the Pope, mad followers of the same will take you to shreds. The key point is that Christianity and other religions have reform, so in order to catch up with the trend of the times, while some Muslims not only to pursue reform, but like back in the

Religion is held sacred to everyone in the world. Every possible identification someone could label themselves is, in a way, a religion. Throughout history, it can be seen that it has affected many decisions. Religion has been the cause of wars, massacres, murders, expansion of land, and more. Every religion has some sort of rules that it goes by, even if those rules are that there are no rules, and they each have some sort of head (god or gods or none). For Catholics, Pope Francis is the oracle for God. Hence, Catholics look to Pope Francis for guidance in many areas of their lives. The Pope is seen making many speeches on many occasions. For each speech, he has a certain agenda. He seems to speak for major events or sectors in the world. Pope Francis adds his input of what God believes in to be right and just. However, do the Pope’s words have actual meaning, or is he just trying to make Catholic followers feel better? In many of his speeches, it can be seen that he doesn’t provide a true answer to many things other than to love one another and to wait for a better life in the afterlife. Even if he does give some input that could be seen as valid information for politics or economy, should Catholics trust his word to make their decisions when he is not an expert in anything but Catholicism? Pope Francis is an example to Karl Marx’s theory of religion. “It is the opium of the people” (insert citation for Criticism of Hegel’s Philosophy).

Religion has been a powerful force in human history. Mankind has longed and searched for the answers to its purpose, the reason for being and the possibility of life after physical death. They reasoned that an afterlife would be a place of accounting and reckoning for the life they lived on earth. Religious belief systems seemed to give the answers as to how to prepare for the afterlife. Religion became the means of giving answers to those basic yet deep-seated questions of both life and death. Religion provided a format of rules and laws for conduct and treatment toward others based on the desires and wishes of a god or gods that people envisioned, imagined or invented. Religious belief systems have been a powerful force for good and bad...good in the sense that it provided a measure of individual behavior and order in society for the wellbeing of the whole, but bad in the sense that men of ambition who craved power and control over others would often use religion as a tool of manipulation and fear. A casual glance of history tells us that complete civilizations have been built, grown and maintained around elaborate religious systems, ancient Egypt being a prime example.

For many decades, there has been a growing interest in the nature of the relationship between religion and crime. There is research that suggests that religion is supposed to comfort those who go through burdensome times such as family issues, divorce, and traumatic incidents. In some instances, religion reduces negative behavior that could result in a criminal act, but there are many crimes committed in the name of religion. Religious crimes date back through ancient times and they have been a worldwide problem since mankind can remember. (Crime in Religion, 2013). In the world today, we witness many occasions where religion contributes to violence; like suicide bombers who kill hundreds of people. Violence committed in the name of religion has been around for decades, but is it considered