Religion Is Interfering With Science And Or Social Progress?

Throughout the history of science and religion there has always been a feud. People have been always told that this feud has lasted for centuries. Since the beginning of the scientific revolution there have a countless number of times in which science has presented a new idea about life that seemed to conflict with religion, and it almost every case religion combats it and ends up being wrong. All of these claims are basically common knowledge in today’s current day and age. Yet, is this common knowledge true? Many times, these conflicts have just been told to people as children by their teachers and parents and the children just blindly believe in these ideas just like their elders did before them. However, once scholars did more research

The conflict between science and religion has always been existed. In many religious institutions, especially Muslim and Jewish, belief in Darwinism or other scientific theories is forbidden (Ferngren, 2002). Therefore, scientific studies in faith schools subsequently differ from normal school one’s. For example, Dawkins (2006) argues that faith schools tend only to teach children in a religious way, avoiding such important curriculums such as science and humanism. Similarly, Cush(2005) states that faith schools provide limited choice of scientific and sociological subjects. The knowledge of science basics is compulsory for every decent citizen in the age of new technologies and scientific humanity progress.

However, conflict can arise when one seeks to use Science to explain Religion and vice versa. Many people believe the two are inherently incompatible with one another but that simply is not true each has their own respective sphere of influence. With Science, one uses the scientific method and undergoes much testing along with much troublesome trial and error in order to calculate the answers to their particular question. Science permits us to ascertain the truth because it allows for theories to be tested and is self-correcting in the sense that most observations can be replicated through conducting experiments by others to reaffirm the validity of one's research. But occasionally well encounter problems when we accept science as absolute fact because while it does do a pretty bang up job at explaining the world we are constantly making new discoveries that either adapt or completely change our prior understandings of how something formerly worked.

The tension between religion and science has existed since the beginning of some of the

Science and religion can coexist because people must understand that science and religion are two ways of understanding and they answer different questions. Today, scientific and religious leaders agree that science and religion represent different realities in life. Furthermore, based on the SF theory scientist also believe that religion is significant in upholding stability and solidarity in society such as it does in the scientific community by upholding moral guidance. Finally, based on the SC theory in history, we have observed that some of the most religious systems have also encouraged scientific progress. Therefore, religious leaders understand that religious restriction prohibits development and scientific growth to the point that the most powerful leaders have encouraged scientific

When dwelling into the explorations about science and religion, one can find it quite amusing. "If science and religion are to continue to coexist it seems opposed to the conditions of modern thought to admit that this result can be brought about by the so-called

Accepting the compatibility between science and religion is a tactic used by those who instinctively fear that a manifest conflict between the two areas would endanger the future of science. They are worried about the possibility that scientists would not receive any financial support or that science classes in schools might be replaced with hours of religion. A huge number of atheist scientists are aware of the negative role, that they have irrational ideas supported by the religion of the future of science. If there is an unreported truth, is that science and religion are incompatible, not in the sense that they cannot coexist in the human mind, but in the sense that there can be no consistency between the two forms of addressing reality. However, attempts to reconcile science and religion do not stop, and that is because the reconciliation never really occurs.

It is no surprise that religion and politics are controversial topics of discussion in almost any environment, especially science. The American population has varying opinions on religion and science and science’s connection to religion. Many may accept they’s theories and ideologies, but many people have different view point on .

The relationship between science and religion is not easy to navigate. On the most basic level, they are viewed as different types of thought. Religion, it seems, deals with the subjective, spiritual realm. Science, on the other hand, seems to deal with facts. It may then appear easy to separate the two realms of thought, and philosophers, theologians and scientists have from time to time attempted to do this. Both science and religion make hypotheses about the fundamental nature of human existence and the nature of the universe, however, and inevitably the claims of each come into conflict. Whether this conflict occurs on a personal level or

The question over the compatibility/non-compatibility of Religion and Science is one topic whose relevance transcends space and time; this is partly due to the evolution of the subjects of Science over the years. Although there are about 4,200 Religions in the world, while there are about 6 Subject areas within Science; it is not uncommon to compare both as though they were single entities. Such comparisons are possible owing to the fact that the different Religions/Subject areas in Science have certain fundamental values common to them. While Religion is based on Faith and a belief system, Science relies on experimental evidence from which inferences are drawn.

With each new development in science comes conflict, mostly from those who don’t believe that science follows the teachings of their religion or allies with their beliefs in an almighty power or God. Looking back in history at some of the great names in human scientific achievement, such as Copernicus, Galileo, and Darwin, we see that with each genius discovery came some outcry from religious groups. Nikolaus Copernicus was one of the first pioneers of science. Until 1540 science had long been a servant of the Christian religion, but Copernicus brought about change, and with that change came persecution. Copernicus’ work, although not immediately and widely accepted, lead directly to the undermining of centuries of assumption and superstition. He was the first to state that not only was the earth not the center of the universe, but it also orbited the sun. Later in history came Galileo who brought Copernicus ' ideas to practical fruition. He was also on the receiving end of much religious persecution, even to the point of living out his last years under house arrest, forbidden from writing and publishing. Then in the 1800’s Charles Darwin researched and published revolutionary biology books on the theory of evolution, his most widely known book being “The Origin of Species”. Even today, long after his death, his works receive much religious debate; religion today is no more apt at dealing with scientific theory than it was hundreds of years ago; this is because it is a

History has shown that in the past, religion dominated as an explanation of knowledge and was used to explain many of the world's mysteries such as why the sun rises and sets and how the world came to be. Science, using concrete and tested evidence, gave light to many of these mysteries and debunked the myths created from religion. In today's modern society, science has advanced in a remarkable fashion. Science has broken down objects into structured molecules, found the genetic code that makes up an individual's DNA, and it even found a way to clone a sheep. Scientists of today are beginning to tread into territories that, some would argue, border along the lines of God's work. With science progressing the way it is, many believe that science and religion will forever be locked in conflict. However, neither side of the argument have truly been able to prove the existence of God. It is in this view that both, science and religion, should cooperate with each other to find the answer instead of senselessly bickering about which side is right.

The relationship between science and religion can be approached by three features: sociological, historical, and epistemological. In these views sometimes science and religion are compatible and in others incompatible, due to the reason that science is based on the objective of knowledge. However, religion utilizes knowledge of the objective just as knowledge utilizes the subjective. Like the book states, “Some people reject any science that contains the word ‘evolution’; others reject all forms of religion….. Evolution is science, however, and only science

Religion tends to respond to inquiries with the stories of divine beings and other powerful strengths that are mystery to people, science tries to clarify and proof things practically. Scientists take a gander at the building materials while religion is not focused on these physical segments of scientific developments. This likewise brings forth the inquiry whether science has the capacity to demystify all unexplainable or whether religion has the ability to explain all parts of life. It is a direct result of the way that science has empowered people to fly, investigate the profundities of the seas, and stroll on the moon. It makes the life of people less demanding than before with heaps of new facilities. On the other hand, solid and practically consummate the perspective of science in the society today cannot cover the whole range of the human encounters without deriving other aspects of religion.

Imagine laying on the beach, listening to the crash of the waves. When suddenly the surrounding noises change, and the sea begins to make a loud roaring noise overpowering everything else. Sitting up quickly in order to see what is happening, as the sea divides all the way to the ground, creating a pathway with two enormous blue walls of water. Dare to walk through and risk the chance of tons of water crashing down, or marvel the miracle at a distance? Many people believe that God split the Red Sea for Moses when he fled Egypt with the Israelites, and that they all walked along the seafloor to the other side. This story along with many others can make it difficult to not be skeptical towards religion.