Religious Sensitivities Between Religion And Art Beckons Controversy And The Wrath Of Family And Community

Art and the Bible, written by Francis A. Schaefer, is a short, simple to the point book regarding how a Christian should approach art. The book is divided into two sections. Section one is title Art in the Bible and section two is titled Some Perspectives on Art.

Agreement and disagreement towards art is a right , if you don’t like a certain art just simply ignore the master piece the artist has created. Allan Parachini in “NEA issues new obscenity guidelines arts” which explains the reasons of the NEA guidelines quotes “Including, but not limited to, depictions of sadomasochism, homoeroticism, the sexual exploration of children or individuals engaged in sex acts" which will not receive funding from the NEA . The governmant has good reasons of not donating to certain charities , due to the fact they don't want images under their name being hate on with words of disgust .The NEA now requires grantees to sign a paper saying that they won’t "create" any art that is repugnant .The government is responsible for funding the “right” fundraisers, which might cause problems due to the requirement of expressing art of nudity . David cole in "the culture war;when governments is a Critic." talks about the governments role in the controversial art , "the inquistion,which tried the painter Paolo Veronese in 1573 for his allegedly sacrilegious depiction of the Last Supper." This artist is very talented and courageous , his piece is considered historic as it has been alive for 444 year’s. It’s disrespectful to question the art of an artist who’s work is being assaulted just because of how it is designed. The exposed art of

First, the artwork that I would like to discuss about is a painting called American Qur’an, Sura 85-86 which was created in 2007 by Sandow Birk. The reason why Birk decided to paint American Qur’an, Sura 85-86 was because he wanted to undermine cultural prejudices about one

At the council, 338 members met to rule on the use of images to depict religious figures and ideas. This assembly, including Emperor Constantine and Leo, rules that “the unlawful art of painting living creatures blasphemed the fundamental doctrine of our salvation—namely, the Incarnation of Christ, and contradicted the six holy synods” (Iconoclastic Council, 1). The Iconoclastic Council bans the use of images and pictures to depict religious ideologies and figures because they feared that worshippers honored the image over the actual person, place, or thing represented. To support their argument, the council recalls the Holy Book in which God states, “Thou shall not make thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath…They changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,…and served the creature more than the Creator” (2). Unlike John, this council uses stronger textual evidence from the Holy Book in order to validate their argument against icons. Furthermore, they argued that “folly” painter constructed the icons to undermine the icons. Council members aimed to demonstrate the icons as evil creations because religious affiliates did not construct them. Nevertheless, the council banned all images, relics, and other representations of

As to philosophy, there are many pieces of art that proved to be controversial. In 1995, artist, Marcus Harvey painted Myra, which was exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1997. Marcus Harvey is an English artist and painter, and was one of the Young British Artists (YBAs). Much of Harvey’s work was displayed globally. A few well-known paintings were “Snaps”, “The Fuhrer’s Cakes”, and “Crucible”. Nonetheless, the art piece Myra was the most controversial painting in his career.

Most people may not know who Chris Ofili is, but chances are that many of them know one of his works, his painting “The Holy Virgin Mary”, displayed at the Brooklyn Museum of Art’s “Sensation” exhibition in 1999. The painting was extremely controversial because of Mary’s exposed breast being made of elephant dung and because of the porno cutouts surrounding Mary. Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and others, saying that such works were not appropriate for public display, immediately attacked the painting, along with the entire showcase of art by different artists. These sharp criticisms were an extreme injustice, condemning the work “The Holy Virgin Mary” based on prejudiced views of what is and what is not

It as well is in an ellipses shape where it is in an oval shape filling most of the canvas. This piece has a very dark atmosphere, as the only highlighted images are that of Christ and and the adulteress. There are people surrounding them all dressed in greys and greens. Jesus is dressed in an ivory which is a color in which people of importance often wore. The adultress life-drained body is looking down towards her exposed breasts as she comes to understand her fate. This painting conveys the emotion of a bible story about Jesus forgiving an adulteress. The emotions run very high as the individual 's facial expressions are locked in surprise and anger. Anger towards the woman and utter shock as to Jesus forgiveness and compassionate heart towards her. Showing Christ bending down to write in the sand as the pharisees behind him are appalled at what he has to say. “He who does not sin may throw the first stone” John 8:7. This reflects reaction to Mannerism, but also the social turmoil of the time. According to the Council of Trent and the Catholic church artworks should be a clear, intelligible subject realistically interpreted in order to stimulate piety. This was part of the reason that the artwork turned towards naturalism, becoming emotionally engaging and intense.

The reading claims that nudes throughout artistic history have been an important source of beauty and controversy. Nudes began to spike during the Baroque period as they were used for the more expressive and emotional arts of the time. In the nineteenth century, nudes became more common, yet became more sensitive. Artists would train by drawing nudes of ancient Greek statues and figures from myth. However, many artists would then move on to create works depicting prostitutes or peasant naked women. This would not please patrons as they were extremely societally taboo. However, this did not start artists from making them, as they moved into the twentieth and twenty-first century. This shows the importance of artistic nudes and their impact

The Brody couple gave the ceramic wall to UCLA. This Ceramic wall has a little information regarding the artist and the previous owners story of the ceramic wall. There are a lot of painting and old artifacts of mostly how people used to view women and how nudity is Art. Men are also displayed showing their private parts with freedom and no shame. At the other side of the second floor I came across painting that had canvas paintings of Christ holding a cross and wearing pink under his garment. The 4 paintings that were displayed on this exhibit was unknown to who the artist is. However, scholars claimed to say that the paintings belong to Paolo Veronese. His painting consists of bright color and his essence goes back considered to the Venetian Renaissance paintings. The information that was provided about the paintings was displayed on the wall next to the paintings. I wonder if when the painting were made people were so concern with the differences of Jesus wearing different colors or why these painting were kept away from the public eye before they were discovered

“It Isn’t pretty…But Is It Art?” is an article written by Diana Mack, an affiliate scholar at the New York-based Institute for American Values. Mack talks about some public disputes that revolved around popular works of literary and art such as the Harry Potter and Picardo Venus, as well as her opinions that center around “the question of what makes a good work of art.” Mack explains that art works carrying “a serious tone of death, hate…and…evil” but not carrying “publicly reflect(ed) community standards of taste, decency, and respect for religious faith” are constantly criticized and sometimes banned. Clearly felt throughout the article through her tone and statements, Mack’s main point is that individuals should not reject or criticize an art work that seem “alien and unappealing.”

Art can be expressed in many forms but one of the best has got to be political art, as it expresses art in a relevant form for many to understand, it doesn’t require knowledge in history. It puts out a statement in a bold way so that people may better understand what is trying to be expressed. Many artists use art in topics like reproductive rights, equality, gun control, human rights, the environment and war to express desire for change. One of the most outspoken political artists is Barbara Kruger, who has had her work installed in many well-known museums. Kruger has become even more known because of her relevance using art to criticize well-known public figures like Kim Kardashian and George W. Bush, she has also been a proud supporter of reproductive rights. One of her most known works is “Your body is a battleground” which was printed in 1989 in her support for the “March for Women’s Lives”. To show the positive and negatives sides of the inner struggle, the good and the evil. She has a reputation of supporting feminism ideas but she hasn’t stopped there, she’s even had her work put on display in the Hirshhorn Museum. She has gotten the attention of The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times because of her distinctive contemporary works. The beauty of her art is that it relates to many, her art ranges from domestic violence to compulsive shopping and everything in-between, it is also really easy

Artwork is for its creativity and has values it all comes down to that God is the creator of everything we see and feel. We, as humans are the best artwork God could imagine because we are created in the image of God artwork can be a form of number of things like the form of fantasy. Three things that I found interesting, and the first one is how that Christian art should be in the twentieth-century art. Language changes and so does art. The second thing is that Christian art really should be different from country to country if Christianity art is in Africa then it should stay in Africa same goes for Japan and Indian these are just a few of examples. The third thing is that the body of the Christian’s artist work should reflects on His or Her Christian worldview. Showing marks of the culture of which the person has become should reflect on you own country and how you embody the nature of the world that is viewed from a Christian standpoint. (Schaeffer, Francis A. Art and the Bible. N.p.: n.p., 2006. 75-76.

Throughout history, people have used paintings and art as a tool to express their religious beliefs and values. Illustrations depicting the Virgin Mary and child, often referred to as Madonna and Child, are one of the most recurring images in Christian and European Art through the ages. Though these paintings and sculptures may have similarities in their iconography and style each work of art varies based on the different artists’ and time periods. Two paintings that portray these features currently reside in the Museum of Fine Arts Houston. The first, Virgin and Child by Rogier van der Wyden, was originally painted after 1454. In the painting, the Virgin Mary is holding Christ against her shoulder as he twists around to face toward the viewers. The second painting is Virgin and Child with a Donor, painted by Antoniazzo Romano and originally painted c. 1480. In this painting, Virgin Mary is supporting Christ who seems to be standing and includes a figure of a man with his hands crossed in prayer. While both paintings depict the mother and child, there are both similarities and differences in style and portrayal. In this paper, I will thoroughly examine these traits, as well as address the similarities and differences associated with the two paintings. This analysis will be done by using information gained from reading Gardner’s Art Through the Ages, in class lectures from ARTH 1381 Art and Society Renaissance to Modern and ARTH 1300 Ways of Seeing Art, and close visual

People who feel that art is forbidden by the scripture point towards the commandments. We have to go into more detail and actually look more into because we don’t fully understand what type of context is talking about. For example there was a section was about no graven image. It says that we should only worship God and have no graven image which literally means an idol. In Leviticus 26:1, “ Ye shall make you no idols, neither shall ye rear you up a graven image, or a pillar, neither shall ye place any figured stone in your land to bow down unto it: for I am Jehovah your God.”

Just as it’s human nature to believe in something larger or more powerful than oneself, it is also human nature to express that divinity through art, this is proven time and time again in human history. Picturing the divine is a type of testimony to show a cultures greatness. The painting Arhats Giving Alms to Beggars comes from the Chinese culture of the Southern Song period. Whereas, the mosaic Christ as Pantocrator comes from the Byzantine culture of the Greek Orthodox tradition. Although these paintings come from very different backgrounds both cultures show the divine and their pressure on mankind to follow the rules, such as giving away worldly desires. By doing so and letting go of material possessions, mankind can be hopeful of