Reminiscing With Young Children Essay

1.1 – Explain the factors that need to be taken into account when assessing development

Describe how children’s interactions in retelling or recreating familiar stories may provide evidence of their pragmatic knowledge.

Middle childhood is a marker for major psychological developments involving emotions’ effects on memory. A child’s mind more clearly encodes experiences and allows for memories

Butler, R. N. (1963). The life review: An interpretation of reminiscence in the aged. Psychiatry, 26(1), 65-76.

It is so rear that individuals verbalize events that took place in their family at an early age.

. Izzie is coming along quite fine cognitively. And it’s fun to watch her grow! During the preschool years, ages 3 and 4, she has started engaging in fantasy play. She acts out scenes with her stuff animals and cartoon characters, and has kept herself occupied with that for up to a half hour. This delighted me because it made me recall Vygotsky’s argument that pretend play, especially if it involves social play, is very important for expanding pre-school age kid’ cognitive skills and of earl that it is helping the brain to develop and become more sophisticated. During this time Izzie has begun to that to tell people about things she has done. She often leaves out key details so I ask her questions along the way to prompt her to fill in the details (Virtual Child). I wasn’t sure if this was where she was supposed to be for her age, but after some research was happy to find out that the autobiographical memory which is the memory of particular events in our lives, doesn’t have much precision

Long-term deficits can occur in learning and memory as the children are exposed to traumatic events, high levels of stress in the home. Unfortunately, these same children are at a higher risk of developing depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity. Language, siblings, and culture also have an enormous impact on brain maturation. Children at any age, with greater verbal fluency are more likely to demonstrate theory of mind. Theory of mind is to know what goes on in another’s mind and develop a folk psychology, an understanding of others’ thinking (Berger, 2011).

The results of the study revealed that familiarity helped children. Levi began her article by stating that young children are able to efficiently remember concepts through their caregivers. Previous studies have shown that infants have the ability to store information in regards to some of the spoken characteristics of their providers. This helps the young child to be able to distinguish familiar voices from strangers. A scenario where it

A strong review of the literature is present in the paper. The writers have acknowledged studies that resulted in inconsistent and inconclusive outcomes and the evolvement of the work done in relation to reminiscence therapy by other researchers. According to Karimia, et al. (2010); Watt, Wong and Cappeliez took the first steps toward removing the ambiguity of working with reminiscence by applying a widely accepted taxonomy and focusing on specific aspects within the classification. They noted identifying integrative and instrumental reminiscences as being particularly beneficial for positive adaptation and psychological well-being in older age. While the title of the paper implies this study to be empirical in nature, it seems this information is the theoretical rationale that this study is based upon. The integrative reminiscence process is credited with aiding in the resolution of self worth, conflict resolution and integration of past and present while the instrumental reminiscence process “involves remembering past plans and goal-directed activities, recalling how one coped with past problems, and drawing from past experience to solve the present

Understanding the boundaries of childhood amnesia has become a large discussion among researchers. Over the years, researchers have developed multiple theories of the boundaries of childhood amnesia for adults, adolescents, and as well for children by using different methodology of measurement (Usher & Neisser, 1993; Eacott & Crawley, 1998; Macdonald et al., 2000; Peterson et al., 2000; Tusin and Hayne 2010; Wang & Peterson, 2014 & 2016). Childhood amnesia occurs when adults are unable to recall memories from their childhood. Although, this definition is still up for debate on whether or not childhood amnesia only occurs for adults, a specific gender, specific cross-cultural difference, or if the boundaries fluctuate over development (Macdonald et al., 2000; Peterson et al., 2000; Wang & Peterson, 2014). While there are still many variables researcher’s must consider when studying childhood amnesia, there is a common theme that arises throughout the research. Researchers are intrigued in the boundaries of childhood amnesia and how using different methods provides different might alter the perspectives and outcomes for how long childhood amnesia lasts after birth (Usher & Neisser, 1993; Eacott & Crawley, 1998; Macdonald et al., 2000; Peterson et al., 2000; Tusin and Hayne 2010; Wang & Peterson, 2014 & 2016). This literacy research review will discuss how the finding within each research method of measurement changes perspectives on how long childhood amnesia last after

Rumination historically has been considered a self-stimulatory behavior that arises in the context of longstanding social deprivation, and maternal behavior may appear to be neglectful or slavishly attentive (Benninga, M. A., Nurko, S., Faure, C., Hyman, P. E., Roberts, I. S. & Schechter, N. L., 2016, p. 1446).

Discussing my childhood reminds me a lot of a graphic memoir that I recently read in class called Fun Home: A Family Tragicomic,[1] by Alison Bechdel. I really enjoyed being able to read something that I could relate to in a

Over the last thirty years, the idea of children as witnesses and the accuracy of their testimony has been widely debated. People are asking themselves if the memories of young children, specifically between the ages of five and ten, can be accurate and in return trusted. So, can children’s memory and testimony be accurate? Prolific amounts of research have been conducted in an attempt to answer this question. Most of the research suggests that unfortunately we can not rely on their accurate recall in testimony. I would have to say I agree with the findings.

Peterson of Memorial University of Newfoundland tested twenty preschoolers from low socio-economic background and randomly divided them into a control and an intervention group. Since she believed that parental styles of talking impact children's narrative skill development, she trained mothers in the control group to use wh-questions, open ended questions, and back channeling rather than yes/no questions. She also encouraged them to speak more frequently and consistently to their children about past events and elaborate one topic instead of switching from one to another. Children were given pretest, before the intervention, post-test after the intervention, and a follow up test a year after the intervention. Their improvement was measured

My earliest memory I remember as a child is around the age of two years old. My Mother would put me in the playpen but I refused to stay. I was able to climb out of it. I remembered my Mother’s face expression that let me know that I better not climb out of the playpen again. This was one of my earliest memories of her setting her boundaries. When I got older, my Mother told me about the situation. She needed to clean and/or cook so she had to put me in the playpen. At the age of two years old, I just wanted to explore and didn’t want to stay in the playpen. This set the tone between us moving forward.