Rene Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

René Descartes believed that the mind and body are separate; that the senses could not always be trusted, but that because we as humans are able to think about our existence, we possess some sort of entity separate than our fleshly body. I believe this separate entity to be a soul”an immaterial and

In Meditation Two of René Descartes’ Meditation on First Philosophy, he notes the sight of “men crossing the square.” This observation is important as Descartes states, “But what do I see aside from hats and clothes, which could easily hide automata? Yet I judge them to be men.” This is an important realization as Descartes argues that instead of purely noticing the men through sight, it is actually “solely with the faculty of judgement,” the mind, that perceives and concludes that the thing wearing a hat and clothes are men. I argue that this view of the outside world by Descartes is incomplete as his idea of “I” is faulty, as well as having a misunderstanding on the importance of the senses.

In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes begins a quest into his own mind and existence by putting all of his beliefs up for questioning in order to determine what can be certain and what can be doubted. He realized that he was able to doubt if he had a body in instances of dreaming or of illusions. But, he was unable to doubt the fact that he had a mind because the mind is the “the thinking thing” that processes all the doubts of his existence. Descartes’ mechanism into figuring out the truth is to doubt everything. Descartes argues that the mind and the body are completely separate entities because of the minds capability to exist on its own. Despite the fact that his argument is well assembled and explained, there are a few doubts and situations which make it unclear as to whether the mind really has a purpose without the body.

In Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes does and experiment with wax to try to prove that things actually exist in this world. This essay is going to prove how we can tell that things actually exist and what can perceive the wax.

Rene Descartes’ third meditation from his book Meditations on First Philosophy, examines Descartes’ arguments for the existence of God. The purpose of this essay will be to explore Descartes’ reasoning and proofs of God’s existence. In the third meditation, Descartes states two arguments attempting to prove God’s existence, the Trademark argument and the traditional Cosmological argument. Although his arguments are strong and relatively truthful, they do no prove the existence of God.

In Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy, he introduces the divisibility argument for his idea of mind-body dualism. It argues that the mind is distinct from the body and that they are different "substances". The argument has two premises; the mind is indivisible and the body is divisible. In this essay, I will interpret Descartes' argument by discussing the key points of these premises and how they are supported. I will also be incorporating my own thoughts on the argument to determine whether the divisibility argument is enough to validate the idea of mind-body dualism.

The belief in a higher power – an omniscient, omnipotent God – can be traced back for centuries, millennia even. Over the years, many great thinkers have struggled to either defend or discredit this belief, a belief that has managed to spread to every corner of the globe. One such thinker is René Descartes. In his Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes attempts to provide logical reasoning to support the existence of God, both asserting his own claims and defending them against possible objections. A prevalent argument against the existence of God is the simple fact that we, as human beings, are not perfect. As a race, we make mistakes every day; students get questions wrong on tests, and confused drivers make left turns when they should have gone right. Those skeptical of God’s existence feel that if we were, in fact, made by a perfect, all-powerful God - and presumably in his image - we would not be imperfectly made, and therefore we would not make mistakes. Descartes, in my opinion, successfully counters this argument, explaining that we only make errors when we misuse the faculties given to us by God himself; therefore, we are not imperfectly made. (Descartes, 59)

In Rene Descartes’ excerpt, Meditations on First Philosophy, he proclaims, “It is beyond question that I shall reach the truth if I think hard enough about the things that I perfectly understand, keeping them separate from all the other matters in which my thoughts are more confused and obscure” (§104). When Descartes made this statement in his fourth meditation, what was he conjecturing by the term “perfect?” According to the standard interpretation, perfect encompasses all required or desirable elements, qualities, or characteristics; as good as it is possible to be. Nevertheless, perfect has different competing interpretations. Perfect could be expressed as complete, flawless, or accurate. Hence, illuminating different denotations of Descartes’ meaning of perfect could stimulate numerous interpretations of the passage.

The Meditations on First Philosophy by Rene Descartes is a thorough analysis about doubt. Descartes describes his method of doubt to determine whether he can truly know something. One of his major arguments is the proof of the existence of God. In this paper, I will attempt to unravel the flaws in Descartes proof that God exists.

For in Descartes terms, it was plausible to doubt that one has a body, but impossible to doubt the existence of one’s mind; therefore “…self and mind must be identical” (Palmer 162).

In the book “Meditations on First Philosophy” Descartes’s presents six different Meditations in which he questions everything he knew and believed in. Throughout the Meditations he addresses specific topics and explains what is legitimate and why. In the film The Matrix, Neo is introduced to a computer program that is deceiving everyone in a situation much like the one Descartes’s describes in the first Meditation. Neo is one of few who realize the frightening reality while the rest continue to be deceived but, just like Descartes with his book, his mission to enlighten them about the obscure reality.

René Descartes was born in 1596 and died in 1650. Throughout his life he studied philosophy, mathematics and science. In philosophy he was greatly known for his work Meditations of First Philosophy, and in Mathematics and science he is known for the Cartesian Coordinate System. Focusing on Meditations of First Philosophy, this book was published in 1641 and is made up of six meditations. These meditations reflect on the existence of man and god, and provided the reasoning behind Descartes thoughts and ideas. Taking a look at the third, fourth, and fifth meditations, it is clear that reason derives its authority from God.

If it is logically possible that my mind exist independent of my body, then my body and mind are distinct things.

Having confirmed his own existence as a mind Descartes, is certain of two things; that he is a being who thinks and that he distinctly and clearly perceives himself as a mind. For Descartes to possess the degree of certainty he needs to construct philosophy and verify other truths he must find a method of identifying things of absolute certainty. He resolves that everything that is clear and distinct is true and that all perceptions he thinks of as clear and distinct are also true.

Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) contains six Meditations. In the first two of these Descartes addresses doubt and certainty. By the end of the second Meditation Descartes establishes the possibility of certainty by concluding that he is a “thinking thing” and that this is beyond doubt. Having established the possibility of certainty, Descartes attempts to prove the existence of God. The argument he presents in the Third Meditation for the existence of God has been nicknamed the ‘Trademark’ argument. This argument deals with types of ideas, of which there are three, a principle called the Causal Adequacy principle, and a sliding scale of reality. The argument concludes that the idea of a God that is a perfect being is an innate idea that is real and was caused by God and therefore God is real. This argument will be explained with the greater detail in the next paragraph. In the Fifth Meditation Descartes again addresses the existence of God with an argument for His existence. This argument is a variation of St. Anselm’s ontological argument. This argument is also framed around his theory of ideas, as well as his principle of ‘clear and distinct perception’ and is explained and discussed in paragraph three. The paragraphs following these will discuss how convincing these two arguments from Descartes are and will deal with various objections. Many of these objections are strong enough that it will be clear why Descartes’ case has failed to convince everyone.