Rene Descartes: The Father Of Modern Philosophy

This essay attempts to explain Descartes’ epistemology of his knowledge, his “Cogito, Ergo Sum” concept (found in the Meditations), and why he used it [the cogito concept] as a foundation when building his structure of knowledge. After explaining the concept I give a brief evaluation of his success in introducing and using this cogito as a foundation. Finally, I provide reasons why I think Descartes succeeded in his epistemology.

In order to understand Descartes’ way of thinking, it is crucial to note his education. He received a sufficient education in mathematics and science which led to his rejection of scholastic philosophy. He was not only taught about old philosophers such as Plato and Epictetus, but there was a recent philosopher [according to his time] named Montaigne who was a

Subsequently, I will attempt to counter possible criticisms with a profounder understanding of Descartes' meaning in the “Meditations on the First Philosophy.” Finally, I will offer a concluding argument that I think correctly reflects and encapsulates my aversion towards Descartes' declaration, “I think, therefore I am.”

In “Meditations,” Descartes discusses the false beliefs he held during his life, and in order to eliminate them, attempts to deconstruct all of his knowledge and reinvent it with a solid foundation made only with what is absolutely true. For this, he would deconstruct everything he perceived as true, starting from his senses (“A Posteriori”, or, according to Baehr, something that needs proper justification through experience), to mathematics (“A Priori”, or, according to Baehr, something that can be known without experiencing) and finally reaching the fundamental truth. Also

Descartes was incorrect and made mistakes in his philosophical analysis concerning understanding the Soul and the foundation of knowledge.  Yes, he coined the famous phrase, “I think therefore I am,” but the rest of his philosophical conclusions fail to be as solid (Meditation 4; 32). Descartes knew that if he has a mind and is thinking thoughts then he must be something that has the ability to think. While he did prove that he is a thinking thing that thinks (Meditation 3; 28), he was unable to formulate correct and true philosophical arguments and claims.  For instance, his argument for faith that a non-deceiving God exists and allows us to clearly reason and perceive was a circular argument.  Another issue with Descartes' philosophy

In Rene Descartes’ Discourse on Method he expresses his disappointment with traditional philosophy and with the limitations of theology; only logic, geometry and algebra hold his respect, because of the utter certainty which they can offer us. Unfortunately, because they depend on hypotheses, they cannot tell us what is real, i.e. what the world is really like. Therefore Descartes suggests a method of thought combining the consistency of mathematics but based on natural truths about what is real, basic knowledge which could not be wrong (like the axioms of geometry). He calls into question everything that he thinks he has learned through his senses but rests his entire system on the one truth that he cannot doubt, namely, the reality of his own mind and the radical difference between the mental and the physical aspects of the world.

The skeptical argument of Descartes opens with how he reflects on several lies that he has believed throughout his life and on the following faultiness of the body of knowledge he has made up from these lies. He has decided to sweep all he thought that he knew so as to begin again from the foundations, to be able to build up his knowledge once again and on more sure grounds. In order to display that science rested on sure strong foundations and that these foundations lay in the mind and not the sense, he began by carrying into doubt all the principles that come to us from the senses. His intention in these arguments is not categorically to prove that there is none that exists or that it is unmanageable for the people to known if anything exists,

Descartes basically believed in clearing everything off the table, all preconceived and inherited notions, and starting fresh, putting back one by one the things that were certain, which for him began with the simple statement of “I exist.” From this statement came his most famous quote: “I think; therefore I am.”

Descartes work has been well known for a while. He is often thought as the first thinker to emphasize the use of reason

The Meditations, which I would presume to be a guide of understanding one’s intellectuality, proves that there is a strong connection between literary content and the philosophical meaning. The use of narrative is also important in delivering and emphasizing Descartes' arguments because it allows the reader to undertake and experience along with the narrator as well as feel connected to many similar characteristics and motivations. For example, Descartes includes many thoughts about the dreaming and questioning of the existence of God which the general audience can easily identify with. For instance, while considering God to be an eternal and immutable substance, he realizes that since the idea of God cannot have originated in himself, he concludes that God must be the cause of this idea and must therefore necessarily exist which again, is a thought most readers will be able to relate

Rene Descartes, a rationalist, said that each person contains the criteria for truth and knowledge in them. Finding truth and knowledge comes from the individual themselves, not necessarily from God. Descartes also believed that reason is the same for every single person. Descartes believed that nothing could be true unless we as humans could perceive it. He also believed that you could break down things into smaller simpler parts. Descartes also believed that there was a relationship between the mind and body. He also believed that the idea of being perfect originated from God since God himself was perfect. He also integrates his mathematical concepts into his methodology. Descartes also applied doubt to his ideas before he

René Descartes was a French philosopher responsible for many ideas and theories still used in the philosophical world today. He earned the nickname “Father of modern philosophy” for his work. One of his most in depth and lasting legacies is his “mind-body dualism” thesis also known as the Cartesian theory of mind.

Secondly, Descartes, by embarking on this reconstruction of his thoughts, hopes to find a stable basis for the sciences. Since Descartes was trained as a mathematician, he likes to find proofs for ideas, so that he can know them with absolute certainty. Initially, he believes philosophy to be the basis for the sciences “insofar as they [the sciences] borrow their principles from philosophy.” However, he concludes that philosophy cannot be the basis for the sciences, saying, “one could not have built anything upon such unstable foundations.” Now, he has to find a stronger foundation for the sciences and it is only through the reconstruction of his thought that he is able to do this.

His goal is the betterment of the human condition. A useful metaphor for explaining the Cartesian system is the ‘tree of knowledge’.[3] According to Descartes the roots of knowledge are metaphysics, to which he applies himself in the Meditations. From the metaphysics grow the physics; for they are justified by the metaphysics; the physics are the trunk of the tree. From the physics branch off mechanics, medicine and morals, the fruits of which take the form of utility, that is, applied science, medicine, and applied ethics (on an interpersonal, or international level). The development of these fruits leads to the improvement of the human condition: freedom from pain, sickness and suffering through medicine, reduction of stresses on the body and freedom from physical labour through applied science (which makes our work easier), and freedom from anxiety and mental strain through the development of applied ethics (which helps us to avoid and resolve conflicts on many levels).

With the emergence of the scientific revolution in the 17th century, views of society and nature were transformed throughout Europe. There were great developments in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology, and chemistry. The world and its views were changing, and with that change, came a new change in thought, a new change in philosophy. Apart from ancient Greek philosophy, which was centered on finding order in a vast variety of things by searching for a fundamental amalgamating principle, Descartes sought to establish order via some fundamental division. Descartes understands and expresses that what we know about our mind is more definite than what we know about the world outside our mind. Descartes’