Replacing the Income Tax With the Flat Tax Essay

In this section of the paper flat tax will be compared with our current tax system in order to distinguish if differences it will make in the United States after its implementation. Along with that, the similarities between a flat tax and progressive tax will be noted too. As it

The IRS argues against the flat income tax since it is regressive with all taxpayers paying the same tax rate. While it is true that the current federal income tax system is progressive, the primary argument for a flat or flatter tax is to simplify the tax system.

Introduction As the United States enters another presidential election year in 2016, the subject of tax reform has taken central stage to many of the issues being discussed. Today, many Democratic lawmakers continue to support rising tax rates under the current progressive tax system, while Republican lawmakers are making a push for a flat-tax system. As concerns over slow economic growth, high unemployment rates, and large government spending deficits grow among millions of Americans, the idea of a Eastern European modeled flat-tax system has grown. Some presidents, including Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, have experimented with the flat-tax system, but Eastern Europe has provided the essential model of success for this type of

Less than fifty percent of Americans actually pay income tax. How can the economy bounce back with only the small middle and upper classes taxed? The nine percent tax on new goods will be implemented to everyone. Insuring that everyone does his or her part in correcting America. Nine percent business and individual taxes will also be apart of the plan. Since everyone in America will pay the same percentage, the progress on balancing

With today’s tax system, Americans feel like they are constantly shoveling their money out the door. People who object the flat tax system argue that it isn’t going to be able to fund the government, but most of us know that our government has a spending problem…not a revenue problem. “In 1970, the federal tax revenue was $192 billion; in 2010, tax revenue was $2.1 trillion – and it still isn’t enough money to pay for all the programs that politicians want.” ("Creators") With this new system, every income group would gain. Through the earned income tax credit, most low income Americans would be eliminated, benefiting the majority. In another sight the gains of the highest income group would be third highest among the six income groups. The income in tax variation and change in incentives would end up resulting in an increase of 1.8 percentage points for the economy.

The push for a tax reform continues to be a popular topic. Many people see the current structure as inequitable and complex. The new proposed tax structure that has been gaining attention is called the Fair Tax Act. It would institute a “national sales tax at a rate of 23%”if it were enacted. The idea is to make the tax structure more simplistic and spread out the tax burden. Another interesting proposed change relates to tax brackets. These brackets would no longer be needed to decide rates on taxable income. Investments will also be much different and potentially have a greater economic impact because the tax on capital gains and property will no longer be in existence. These are just a few of the changes that could occur with

However, a flat income tax rate would also give those that already make more than most, even more money. Even so, I believe that a flat income tax rate would resolve a lot of conflict. As well as banishing the belief that those who earn more are treated differently, compared to those who earn less than average.

Is a flat tax really better than our current progressive tax system? It is currently being contemplated as an alternative solution to the ever-increasing tax debacle in the United States. With such a significant and potentially life-changing event on the rise, it is vital to address the concerns involved. If implemented, the flat tax system would cause a loss of revenue for the government, greatly reduce IRS jobs, and negatively impact the lower income families.

Flat Tax: Let’s Make it Fair So imagine that you’re working really hard, and the glorious day has finally come. Pay day. Once you finally have that money and you have to pay taxes, you realize that you have to pay a lot more money towards taxes just because you work harder. This is why having a flat tax is necessary. Not only will it make taxing fair, but it will make it better for the economy. A recent poll in 2014 was asking whether Americans thought the government should switch to a flat tax. 62% of the people agreed to having a flat tax instead of a progressive, and only 33% do not want a flat tax (reason.com, 1). This clearly shows that the people want a flat tax because they know it will help the economy, be simpler than a progressive tax, and will be much more fair.

People have said for years that the only two things inevitable in this world are death and taxes. Indeed, any legitimate national government has the power to tax its people in some fashion. It is a complicated issue that experts continue to debate to this day. Higher taxes do not necessarily mean a prosperous economy. In fact, more times than not, high taxes hurt the economy. The United States should implement a flat tax policy that is based on biblical principles, because it is fair for all across the board, because it will increase revenue by discouraging tax evasion, and because the flat tax form is much simpler to understand.

The Fair Tax® is a proposed tax reform to the current taxation process of the federal government in the United States. Written by John Linder and first introduced to Congress in 1999, the Fair Tax® is a proposition for the federal government to get rid of all current taxes (including federal income taxes, estate taxes, payroll taxes, etc.) and tax only the purchasing of goods and services for personal consumption. Instead of taxes being applied to income, each individual would receive their full paycheck with no federal taxes deducted and instead a 23% sales tax ($0.23 for every $1.00) would be included in the price of an item. This translates to about a 30% sales tax ($0.23 on top of every $0.77) today, because instead of the item being $1.00 it would be sold for $0.77 with a $0.23 tax on top, whereas the price under the Fair Tax® would be $1.00 with the tax included in the price. This percentage would be adjusted each year based on the government’s revenue in the previous fiscal year. To make up for the large tax on sales, each citizen would receive a “prebate” or annual consumption allowance check that should negate the sales tax on purchases that are essential for living. The prebate would be given to each individual based on the poverty-level. (1) There are several points made opposing the Fair Tax®, but in this paper I will mainly be discussing the supporting points and how it would benefit our country’s citizens, businesses, economy, and government.

We have all heard the famous quote by Benjamin Franklin who stated, “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” (“Benjamin Franklin Quotes”) We find this to be true as we begin working and feel the pain of money being taken from our paychecks.

The Solution to Our Broken Tax System Imagine a tax reform that would save Americans like yourself thousands of dollars each year, a system that would ensure that you and your fellow taxpayers are paying their fair share each year, no more, no less, and system which would help to stimulate economic growth in America for years to come. Our current taxation system is broken, and without a complete overhaul, the system will just grow and get worse by the year. The answer, a tax reform implementing a flat taxation system. This system could be the foundation for economic growth and expansion, which all Americans would benefit from. The flat tax system is a simple straightforward, black and white taxation plan and the implementation of it would

A flat tax is a single rate that covers all income brackets of taxpayers, rather than the current “progressive” system, in which taxes higher-income individuals at increased rates and includes numerous deductions and exemptions. Under A 9% plan, Americans would pay a flat 9 percent rate on their personal incomes, corporate incomes, and on sales. Another option would be a “Cut, Balance and Grow” system that would give taxpayers the choice to opt out of the current system and pay 20 percent on individual income and allow for a few of the deductions in the current code. Proponents of the flat tax argue that it would simplify the tax code while broadening the tax base. Opponents say the flat tax would shift much of the revenue burden to middle and low income Americans while lowering taxes on the wealthiest

In theory, flat taxation seems like an equitable simplification of the existing tax system; however, significant downsides make implementation in the purest sense impractical in the United States. Despite the advantages of flat taxation - fairness, simplicity, and economic growth, - the United States is unlikely to adopt a pure flat