Report : Driving Employee Engagement Essay

One of the primary factors in employee engagement is a person’s relationship with his or her direct manager. Some managers are excellent at managing teams and making each person feel valued, while others don’t have the same abilities. Train your managers in the skills that can improve employee engagement, and it can boost your organization’s overall results. Most employees fear their supervisors, so they choose to leave because they don’t want to work in a stressful environment. However, they don’t always express their

The following research paper describes in detail the relevance of employee engagement to a healthcare provider. Engagement of employees is often an overlooked area of focus as hospitals look for ways to improve processes and reduce operating expenses. Healthcare is somewhat unique in that cost to the customer is not the main economic force driving patients to the various hospitals or healthcare providers. The focus of the following is to examine the importance of employee engagement hospital wide. There are factors that lead a prospective patient to choose one healthcare provider over another, assuming choices exist. When discussing engagement, emotions can play a

1.3 Compare and contrast employee engagement with other related concepts; ‘flow’, organisational commitment, job involvement and job satisfaction.

Those individuals with high job satisfaction tend to have positive feelings towards their job, their colleagues and the company that hired him or her. On the other hand, those who are not satisfied have strong negative notions towards their organization (Robbins and Judge, 2015). Employee involvement has a direct correlation with job satisfaction. Companies that allow their employees to be involved in the decision-making process and give them the freedom to show their talent through their work, has become the forefront of employee engagement. For many years, businesses have been following archaic traditions in the sense of people would go to work, complete their hours under supervision and go home. Today, employees look forward to going to work for a company where the workplace is more friendly and connected (Suma and Lesha,

Employee engagement has been a trend of management since 2004.(CMI 2015) ‘Some people may believe that engagement is just about employees ‘going the extra mile’, but it is much more.’(CMI 2014) Within globalization, how to apply employee engagement is significant for an organization to achieve their performance. A key aspect of employee engagement concerns how employees manage their position, performance and development in relationship to the company’s strategies. Therefore, according to Moenguc (2013), employee engagement has been personalized as a“persistent, positive affective-motivational state of fulfillment.” To demonstrate how this process affects the overall performance of an organization, John Lewis has been selected as the case study

There are several procedures in which workforce engagement can be assessed. The first method of assessment used by our educational institution that I will discuss in this section, is formal teacher observations and informal walk-throughs performed several times throughout the week. This assessment of workforce engagement is aligned with the state teacher observation tool and rubric in determining the level of effectiveness of each educator.

As Gallup measured in their research that there is still an overwhelming number of disengaged individuals in the workplace, which has cost the organizations in the United States at an enormous amount of about 300 billion dollars annually (Gallup Consulting, 2006). Certain programs are initiated in different workplace to embed employee engagement. Personally, apart from the traditional motivational factors of financial and non-financial incentives to increase employee morale and active participation within the goals of the organization; it would even be more remarkable to come up with innovative practices that would be unique to the organization and meet the demands of the business.

Better goods, services, technology, and tactics are several things that make one business more successful than the other. In addition, to have a competitive advantage, employee engagement is more essential than ever to the success of a business. Research has also shown that when it comes to employees, the ones who are engaged outperform considerably higher than employees not engaged. The individual correlation between the employee and their leader is important. Employee engagement is guided by the actions of their leader. The leader is responsible for creating an environment in which the employees remain engaged. There are five skills that are crucial for a good leader to possess to successfully increase engagement. They are building trust, mentoring, inclusion, alignment, and team development.

Maintaining and improving employee engagement are increasingly complex for company’s operations these days due to the instable environment and varied economic conditions (Aon Hewitt, 2012). However, if a company has a good performance in employee engagement, it would surely enjoy competitive advantage and better business outcomes than other companies.

The challenge presented by the literature is the lack of a universal definition of employee engagement. Most managers acknowledge the fact that employee

An organization is like a tree full of monkeys, all on different limbs at different levels.

There are several standardized tests, toolkits and instruments available, which can help determine the level of employee engagement in an organisation. Q12, a 12-question survey of the Gallup Organisation, identifies strong feelings of employee engagement in four key areas - customer satisfaction/loyalty, profitability, productivity, and employee turnover. The questionnaire has been administered to a multitude of companies across the world. Results from the survey show a strong correlation between high scores and superior job performance and many organisations have found it to be definitive measure of the engagement level of their employees. Standard Chartered, for example, introduced a Q12 annual survey to measure improvement in the

According to Gallup-2013, 142 country study on state of The Global Workplace only 13% of employees worldwide report that they are engaged in their work. In contrast 63% of employees are not engaged and other 24% are strong disengaged. As, engaged employees are crucial of development of company as well as for country, so it is important to study engagement and disengagement of employees and factors involved so as to improve the condition.

On the basis of the set of provocative propositions, as mention above, employee will take initiative and act differently aligned with organizational vision. Appreciative inquiry helps in team building, through experiments and test, and found improvement in a team 's process and performance (Bushe & Coetzer, 1995).

Over the last decade, various scholars have defined employee engagement as a two-way relationship between the employer and the employee based on an intellectual commitment of the employee to the organisation (Baumruk et al, 2006; Shaw, 2005). As employees perform their role they expresses themselves physically, cognitive and emotionally (Kahn, 1990), they are psychologically present (Saks, 2005) and have a positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind that is characterised by vigour (energy and involvement), dedication (enthusiasm, pride to work for the organisation, inspiration, and challenges), and absorption (concentration) (Schaufeli et al, 2002; Baker et al, 2008).