Request for Conversion of an Advance Contract to a Standard Contract
Derek Beach and Rasmus Brun Pedersen (with Jørgen Møller and Svend-Erik Skaaning), University of Aarhus, Denmark
Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing
In their first book with the University of Michigan Press, Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines (2013), Derek Beach and Rasmus Brun Pedersen not only developed the underlying logic of process tracing but also provided a practical guide for employing this method in social science research. Now they do the same for additional causal case study methods, including small-n comparative and congruence methods as well as process tracing.
Causal case study methods have attained a level of maturity where it is no longer necessary to define methodological foundations and principles merely by how they differ from quantitative, variance-based methods. What social scientists want to know is how causal case study methods differ from each other with regard to their ontological and epistemological foundations, how to determine which method is most appropriate for a given research situation, and how to employ the selected method(s), step-by-step, from research design through analysis. In Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing, Beach and Pedersen fill this need.
First, Beach and Pedersen provide a cohesive logical foundation for causal case study methods.
Most time, acceptance would be made in clear and loud matters, such as saying “Yes, I accept.” But silence would constitute acceptance of an offer where the common-law and statutory law allows. Supreme Court of Nebraska has confirmed in Joseph Heiting and Sons v. Jacks Bean Co that acceptance may be established by silence or inaction of an offeree and acceptance occurs when the buyer/offeree “does any act inconsistent with the seller/offeror’s ownership...” Neb. U.C.C. section 2-606(1)(c). In Joseph Heiting and Sons v. Jacks Bean Co, 463 N.W.2d 817, 236 Neb. 765 (Neb.,1990), Heiting (Plaintiff) offered to sell its beans at the posted price on September 30, 1987, but was never informed of acceptance or rejection of the offer. Heiting and Jacks
In this paper, the definition and description of what a case study is, what are some reasons for using a case study, what are some disadvantages and advantages of this approach? Also included in this paper I will talk about what are some of the ways a researcher can acquire information that can is used for a case study. A case study can be defined as a descriptive account of the behavior, history, and other relevant factors concerning a particular individual (Cozby, Bates, 2012).
These two Case Studies come from a National Center on Case Studies. I think that a case study approach is very useful in applying knowledge and this is what makes you learn it better. They may be a little daunting when you read them but I will help you go through them. Please ask for help so this topic becomes more enjoyable for you.
For the Final Paper, you will identify three to five research studies from peer-reviewed sources that were published within the last ten years, which investigate a particular social science problem or topic. The Final Paper will focus on critiquing the varying statistical approaches used in each of these studies.
Case studies allow for in-depth explorations of nuanced topics in real situations. They are especially useful in obtaining insight on specific issues or situations in their natural environment. Specifically, in critical health studies we are able take different models and theories and apply them to real situations to better understand the nuances behind them. In case studies, critical reflections are a necessary tool. Critically reflecting on an issue or topic allows for the heart of the issue to be viewed from a different lens, integrating different models and theories from those originally shown. With this in mind, the intent of this paper is to critically analyze how applying the disciplinary perspective of health psychology and a
Each of these methods has their pros and cons. This portion will analyze the benefits and downfalls of these methods. An advantage that a case study can offer is that they can simplify some of the most complex concepts. From a positive perspective, a correlational
In addition to these, there are other determinants which are wider and broader and are termed as the “causes of the causes”, which include the environment, social and economic contexts in which individuals live.
The framework suggested by Walker and Avant was used for the analysis described in this research. The method of research included:
The strategy of case studies contributes to a dynamic analysis area of a country with specific characteristics. The determinants of health and diseases emerge from factors that cause imbalance from a phenomenological aspect that affects the culture of the families.
This essay will use case studies with reference to social science literature and official reports to further explain and discuss the difficulties
The authors used a descriptive case study which is a methodological approach that can use a number of different methods to conduct an instrumental investigation that is bounded by place and time. Case study research asks questions of ‘what’, ‘why’, and ‘how’ in a non controlled or non artificial environment to analyse existing, real life situations with all their complexity
This section provides an introduction to the different types of research paradigms and methods before concluding on the approach that this study will undertake.
A case study is a specific instance that is frequently designed to illustrate a more general principle (Nisbet and Watt, 1984). Hitchock and Hughes (1995) further suggest that the case study approach is particularly valuable when the researcher has little control over evens. Case studies strives to portray ‘what it like’ to be a particular situation, to catch up reality and ‘thick description’ (Geertz, 1973) of participants’ lives experiences of, thoughts about and feelings for a situation. They involve looking at a case or phenomenon in its real-life context, usually employing many types of data (Robson, 2002). It is important in case studies for events and situations to be allowed to speak for themselves, rather than to be largely interpreted, evaluated or judged by the researcher. In this respect the case study is akin to the television documentary. Case studies can make theoretical statements, but, like other forms of research and human sciences, these must be supported by the evidence presented.
Kristen 's Cookie Company is a good example where the success or failure of the company depends directly on the process planning adopted by the company, i.e., the company can maximize its productivity by utilizing its resources effectively. One major aspect of process analysis is to identify the major bottlenecks in the process and trying to mitigate their effects with least possible level of costs and resources. The following flowchart shows the overall process adopted by the company: (Exhibit 1)
There are three main types of descriptive methods: observational methods, case-study methods and survey methods. This article will briefly describe each of these methods, their advantages, and their drawbacks. This may help you better understand research findings, whether reported in the mainstream media, or when reading a research study on your own.