preview

Rereading The Learner

Decent Essays
Open Document

The Seven Laws of the Learner is a method to improve the teaching ability of any teacher. There are seven laws given which relate to the learning process of students. These laws are essentially truths about seven areas which effect teaching and learning, making the case, that if a student is not learning then a teacher is not teaching. The laws build on each other to form a teaching method which, if applied, will greatly improve the effectiveness of any teacher. Wilkinson gives the argument that the teacher is responsible for the students learning, early on the book, he explores Scripture to demonstrate the Hebrew root word for teach and learn are the same word.
Wilkinson uses the first chapter to set up the principles in the book, as well …show more content…

There were many areas where I questioned or sought clarification in what I read, as I did this. Upon rereading the text and thinking about the main theme of the book. I realized time and time again Wilkinson is correct in his overall argument, teachers must take the responsibility for learning, he does an excellent job of presenting the facts, and information needed to improve any teacher and better prepare us for the higher standard we are held to by God as teachers of His word.
The first reason I agree with the book, as a whole, and find nothing of note to disagree with, is as suggested seeking the Holy Spirit for illumination has produced an obvious agreement with the Bible and the principles in this book. The Scriptures referenced are properly applied, the point Wilkinson uses to make with the passages fall within the meaning of the passage within their …show more content…

I have mentioned repetition several times in relation to retention, I think this is because I have found repetition to be irritating when I have previously encountered it. In this book, the ideas are repeated many times, they are not quoted, but restated and applied to the current point. Not simply thrown in there in the exact same package they were previously delivered in, as is done in so many of the classes I have attended. The law of need is also an area I will include in all my teaching on a much deeper level. I will find a better reason than, because Jesus said so, or that it what administration said we had to do. They are compelling reason to be compliant, but they don’t really explain the need. Because we said so is not very motivating and does nothing to equip the learner. While reading about the law of need the subject of math kept coming to mind. I must honestly confess math is my least favorite and history is my favorite area of study, until I was introduced to theology, I practically crave theology. The point being, the need for history and theology were self-apparent to me, math on the other hand is all but useless to me, not basic math, percentages and fractions and such, but algebra and irrational numbers. It

Get Access