Unit 2 Research Ethics

Better Essays
Research Ethics This paper discusses research ethics and steps the author must take in order to ensure her proposed dissertation project is conducted in an ethical manner. It includes discussions on data management and reporting, laxity and mistakes, scientific misconduct, the Belmont report principles, institutional review board (IRB) approval, and collaborating with a mentor. It ends with recommendations for researchers and a conclusion on the responsibility of scientific researchers to all those affected by their research.
Literature Review
In the pursuit of scientific knowledge, researchers often undergo professional and personal pressures concerning their interaction with colleagues, designing their study investigations, and presenting their study results. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.), National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), National Academy of Engineering, Policy and Global Affairs and Institute of Medicine (U.S.) (2009) wrote a guide on ethical principles to note while conducting research, According to them, making the right decision in research is important, as failure to do this can lead to weakened personal and professional trust, delayed knowledge advancement, as well as wasted time and effort. In order to mitigate these threats to research, professional principles that express generally acceptable traditions of working with others and conducting research have been developed. In his book on behavioral research, Cozby and Scott (2012)
Get Access