Research Paper On Animal Rights

Is it ethical for animals to have the same rights as humans? During this paper I will present the views of both sides. I will try my best to give the reader a chance to come to there own unbiased conclusion. I will talk about the key areas of animal ethics. I will present the facts and reasoning behind the arguments over Animal cruelty, testing, hunting, and improper housing. My conclusion will hopefully bring us closer to answering many of the question surrounding “Animal Rights and Ethics”.

When a cause is brought up and given light, it has a way of splitting people in how they react to it. And such has been true when it comes to granting new rights, because it’s brobdingnagian in our society that is always hungry for freedoms. We are split down the middle on whether, or not to consider animals, just like us, and thus deserve the rights we hold in our society today. On the other end, are people who don’t believe such rights should be given to animals. While the pro-arguments hold value, there is much more to see on the other end. As to why animals shouldn’t have a “Bill of Rights” like we as humans do. It’s shown in various different ways, even the most popular arguments held by the opposing side. Such as cows hurting the environment, zoo’s being inhumane, and pets. There are other factors as well to take into consideration such as food, psychology medicine, and even culture.

“Nearly as many, 68 percent, were concerned or very concerned about the well-being of animals used in ‘sports’ or contests as well as animals in laboratories (67 percent) (Kretzer, 1).” Many people question whether an animal is capable of thought and emotions. Others feel as though animals are the equivalent of humans and should be treated as such. Since the 1800’s, animal rights has been a topic that has several different sides including two extremes. If animals can react to their environment, emote, and are aware of things done to or with them, then they should have similar rights to humans.

What do you think when you hear about an Animal Bill of Rights? The Animal Bill of Rights protects our animals from abuse, neglect, unfair experiments, and so much pain.

I understand the philosophy behind your belief that animals cannot possess rights. You have explained in great detail why “rights” are intrinsically human by nature. The idea behind having rights can only be applied to a “moral-being” because there must be reciprocity.

Animal rights is the philosophical belief that animals should have rights, including the right to live their lives free of human intervention. Animal rightists are philosophically opposed to the use of animals by humans. Some accept relationships with animals, such as companion animal ownership. Overall, this means that animals are not to use for food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation. They are multiple organizations that support animal rights, but the most popular organizations are PETA, Humane Society of the United States, and the Farm Sanctuary. There is a famous quote from Mahatma Gandhi that states, “The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated.”

Animals deserve their rights because they are living, breathing, and capable of feeling just like human beings. Animals are vital to sustain our ecosystem and the effects of the mismanagement in the commercial and gaming industries further devastate our environment.

Even though animals inhabit the world along humans, humans believe that they have superiority over these creatures. This superiority comes with power and that power is overused. Many animals today are in danger, because people are injuring and killing animals is the reason why. Animal cruelty is shown in many different ways. Some ways include, abusing them when they are pets, using them for entertainment, testing on them, and feeding on them. Animals should receive rights because they live a harsh life of pain and oppression.

“It is an important task of political philosophy not just to describe the features of an ideal political society in order to act as a beacon of travel, but also to light the paths we can take to reach it.” Animal rights has been a popular topic of discussion for years. Despite research, debates, and activist groups, humans still have not come to a consensus on what can truly help our non-human friends. As a result, most people have decided to look the other way and animals are suffering because of the peoples’ lack of involvement. This article was a great discovery, because I really enjoyed the author’s style, it provided a fresh approach to the topic, and the information was organized

Animal advocates should receive the grant because the organization rescues animals in need and turns in animal abusers to the police. Animal abusing is a widespread issue around the globe. We may not be able to save every animal in the world , but we will save the animals we can. Animal advocates need money to vaccinate, feed, and house our animals. The Animal Advocates are passionate about the well-being of these animals. It has been estimated that there are 900-2000 new cases of animal abuse each year.

Many question on whether animals should have legal rights or not. To say that animals should have rights is both ethical and unethical. The animal civil rights movement started in 1975. Civil disobedience was used as a tactic to gain public attention for their cause. It was argued that since non-human animals cannot enter a social contract, they cannot possess any legal rights. To say that people oppose the idea of animals being as free-willed as humans does not mean that they are advocates for animal abuse; but it was declared immoral to give animals irrelevant and useless rights that they would not understand.

Animal rights is not just a philosophy, but a kind of social movement that challenges this society’s view that all nonhuman animals only exist for the sole purpose of human’s benefit. It’s the idea that all non-human animals are entitled to possession of their own lives and that their basic interests should be afforded the same consideration at basic interests of humans. It’s not about putting an animal above a human, or giving an animal the same rights a human is entitled to. Every creature has a will to live free from suffering and pain. Prejudice is a preconceived opinion that is not based on a reason or an actual experience. Only prejudice allows humans to deny others all the rights we expect to have. Whether that is based on race, gender, species, or sexual orientation, prejudice is morally unacceptable. Knowing what animal rights are is important because awareness needs to be raised on the subject. That way, more legislature may be put in place to stop all forms of animal cruelty.

backs and they were dragging their hind legs (Reed 38). While in the lab, the

For many years now the world has seen controversy over the rights of animals and if they think and feel like humans do. Many people see animals as mindless creatures or as food, while others think they have emotions and can feel pain. In other countries animal protection laws are in place that are strictly enforced and seem to work well with the system. In the United States however; some of the animal rights laws are considered to be useless and under-enforced (Animal Legal & Historical Center). More people today are beginning to see that animals should have rights and should be protected by laws and regulations (Animal Legal & Historical Center). Sadly there are many people residing in the United States who don’t take animal rights or protection laws seriously. These people abuse animals in many ways, including food industries that disobey the regulations set in place for the slaughter of animals used for consumption. Luckily for the animals there are people who fight for their rights and the enforcement of laws called animal rights activists.

For the past 20 years, there has a been an on going heated debate on whether experiments on animals for the benefit of medical and scientific research is ethical. Whether it is or isn't, most people believe that some form of cost-benefit test should be performed to determine if the action is right. The costs include: animal pain, distress and death where the benefits include the collection of new knowledge or the development of new medical therapies for humans. Looking into these different aspects of the experimentation, there is a large gap for argument between the different scientists' views. In the next few paragraphs, both sides of the argument will be expressed by the supporters.