Research Paper On College Athletes

College athletes should not be paid to participate in sports at the collegiate level because it is a choice, they receive some form of scholarship, and it would cost more money. To begin with, one article suggests that the student has the choice to play sports. All colleges offer a variety of different majors and minors to choose from. College is not just about sports, it is also about getting your education, whether you take it seriously or not (Let’s Not Pay College Athletes, Chudacoff). Furthermore, Smith states that college athletes receive some form of scholarship. On top of having their tuition paid for, they also receive benefits, like room and boarding fees waived and their textbooks paid for. These athletes get to enjoy going to college

It is time to pay college athletes. The collegiate sports nonprofit conglomerate the NCAA is an organization that oversees over 1200 institutions between two divisions, D1 and D2. They implement rules and regulations that every student athlete must follow between these two divisions regardless of their sport or school. These top college players are expected to withstand a 40 to 50 hour training and playing schedule While keeping up their school work in the same week. Because of this many of these students get nothing out of their scholarships they receive to attend the school and an even smaller amount of these kids even make it to a higher level of competition. The NCAA the tax exemption monopolistic program takes in an average of over

Should college athletes be paid for the efforts in their respective sport? Athletes are being paid by the education they receive from the university. Letting universities pay athletes would make the student athlete responsible for taxes and other major choices making them a professional and not an amateur.

Division 1 college athletes spend an average of 21 hours practicing a week and an additional 29 hours on other team activities. This comes out to about 50 hours a week doing team related activities which doesn’t give the student- athlete time to go out and get a job. I’m not saying college athletes should get paid millions of dollars I’m saying they should at least get paid enough to maintain themselves. Some college athletes have kids but don’t have time to get a job because their either on the road traveling in school or at practice. Giving student-athletes some type of pay would give them the ability to take of their kids if they have any and buy regular necessities without struggling.

Donald Delahaye, a kicker for UCF you may have heard of him. Lost his NCAA eligibility for making and profiting of his YouTube videos. Another name you may know LiAngelo Ball. Couldn’t profit or promote his family made business of Big Baller Brand (BBB) because of NCAA eligibility rules. His little brother LaMelo Ball could lose his NCAA eligibility for making and profiting off his own signature shoe. These athletes all have something in common. All these athletes, these people have either had their eligibility taken or in jeopardy because they were profiting off their image, content, or likeness. College coaches, programs, and schools make millions off their student athletes and the NCAA billions off the student athletes. As more people

At the time of its inception in 1906, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was a non-profit organization mandated with the management of athletics and sports in colleges and universities across the United States and Canada. The board had a unique operational structure that provided payments and stipends to the student-athletes through a model known as altruism. The model limited the benefits the student-athletes drew from the association to their necessities in the colleges. However, the body changed its approach by denying student-athletes any form of remuneration. Instead, it concentrated on providing scholarships and other academic benefits to the athletes. As such, compensation of student-athletes has become

Another argument why college athletes shouldn’t be paid is that it would be hard to control. With all that athletes playing college sports how would you know how much to pay each player. This is a simple fix. You just give every college athlete a base salary. You set the amount of money each athlete gets and no certain athlete gets anymore or any less. People could argue that this is unfair because some athletes put in more time than others and some sports produce more revenue than others. This is a valid point. If you work harder and for longer than another athlete why should you get paid the same amount as them? If this is the case pay the athletes a base salary of say $2,000 a year and however long the athlete’s sport goes for take that ratio to the year. So if you do a sport that takes up 6 months of the year, that is half a year of athletics so you get half the amount a full year of athletics would get. In this case you would end up only getting $1,000. Another strong argument is that what if the athlete plays two sports like Heisman Trophy winner Jameis Winston. He plays both quarterback in football and pitcher in baseball. In this case he should get just as much as everybody else who plays a sport that takes up a full year like football. He would not get any additional bonuses to the base salary. If you had a part time job that pays federal minimum wage which is $7.25

Good afternoon ladies and gentleman. I stand before you today with a matter that is very prominent in the college sports industry, especially within the sports of football and basketball, and that is whether or not to pay the collegiate athletes. I firmly believe that college athletes have the right to receive payment due to their services in the sport. Many college sports are large attractions for these schools resulting in a gross of millions of dollars for the universities. The league that represents them, the NCAA, is a billion dollar organization due to the popularity of the sports teams. The players on these teams deserve a fraction of the money that they bring to these other groups. Also, making it to the professional level is a

High school athletes have really only one option after high school to continue playing their chosen sport, and that option is to play for a college team. However, if the student does play for a college the student must adhere to the National Collegiate Athletic (NCAA) rules and regulations. By doing so, the student athlete gets a sports scholarship, especially if the student participates in a making money sport. And here lies the problem. Many of the fan favorite sports like football and basketball rakes in millions of dollars for not just the universities of winning teams but also for the NCAA. Student athletes do not receive any compensation outside of scholarships. In effect the NCAA has a monopoly on the talent, efforts, and earning potential

I chose the topic are college athletes given preferential treatment over non-athletes while in college because it is something very controversial in college athletics. Besides being controversial, I also find the topic very interesting. It is interesting to me to find out why college athletes get special treatment to play a sport when in reality the special treatment is probably a disservice to the athletes. Another reason I enjoy this topic is that I love sports in general and college athletics are some of my favorites to watch.

There has been a long standing controversy over college athletes and their ability to be protected by the NCAA, which is the organization that governs college athletes. In particular college athletes believe that they are being taken advantage of by the colleges for the entertainment they provide. The National Collegiate Athletic Association makes about $871. 6 million per year. College athletes do not receive any of this money directly. The NCAA has the authority to say how many athletic scholarships are available for each sport in Division I and Division II schools. These scholarships are quoted as being “miniscule” and barely enough to cover the full tuition of the various schools. So, the athletes are the ones that pay the price;

Imagine being a college football player, playing for the college of their dreams, but the only catch is that they only have time for practice and schoolwork each day. They are also faced with little to no sleep, as well as little money to buy food and clothes. This is the life of many college football players every day who are not being paid to play football. College football players put forth an average of 40 hours of conditioning and practice a week and are not paid a cent for all the effort and pain they face in a season. As a result, there is much controversy surrounding whether or not college football players should be paid to play football while attending school. People believe paying them will take away from the meaning of the game while

It is important to first understand the complex and structured program that college swimmers have to follow with discipline in order to meet the high expectations of elite athletic departments. According to research, the amount of physical training for swimmers has greatly increased over the last decades (Bompa, 1985; Murphy, Fleck, Dudley & Callister, 1990). A combination of intensity, duration and frequency of training stimuli is a key characteristic for efficient training (Faude, Meyer, Scharhag, Weins, Urhausen & Kindermann). There is evidence that exponential increases in volume of physical training will increase an athlete’s physiological capacity which often leads to increases in performance

I'm going to represent to you the side of the argument that does not feel like college athletes should be paid. The first argument is that student-athletes already received scholarships and other benefits. As stated in text “While not all student-athletes are on scholarship, many are, particularly those who are playing for schools we see winning National Championships. In addition to free tuition and room and board, these college athletes also often receive stipends to help towards books and other basic needs.” So with help towards tuition and textbooks and essentials, student-athletes shouldn't need the extra money to get through college, mainly because the funds used for their tuition and dorms and textbooks don't need to be paid back to the

In my life, the one thing that has always been most interesting to me is sports. I have grown up around sports my entire life and have always stayed active in following it. Over the past few years, there has been a question that has lingered over the sports world and caused a significant amount of controversy. The question would be whether or not college athletes should get paid to play. I have always had an opinion on this very large topic, but as time goes on, new variables keep arising and changing the factors within this skeptical topic. As I began to actually research the topic, many new aspects were brought up. Things such as university funds, businesses, and fairness were continuously brought up. Luckily all these were easy to look